Am I the only one that wants Mitt to come out of the closet and officially become a proud Democrat?

Why, what did Mitt do in 2016?

Thanks for setting the record straight; I forgot why Mitt was butthurt. My original meme still stands though.

He is such a sh*t head

He's praying (probably literally) that Trump is impeached, based on the incredibly delusional belief that he can then step into the void, and be the republican nominee, somehow backdooring his way into being POTUS

oddly enough, the RNC is not allowing ANYONE to primary against Twitler,

RINO Mittens and his RINO VP Paul Ryan are both swamp creatures and NeverTrumpers.
If you haven't noticed, NeverTrumpers are correctly becoming an endangered species.
Survival of the fittest.

McCain is burning in hell, next to fat ass Ted Kennedy and Howard Metzenbaum.

get rid of him lol

Yep. Did you see a Republican from Kentucky is trying to hold up the vote today?

A congress man who stands up for his morals and puts COUNTRY over party- not allowed in the RNC!

Yeah, puts a sham impeachment with no crime or victim over COUNTRY because he is a bitter backstabber like his dear father. That is not allowed in my book. The only thing that you need to know about Romney's character can be summed up in two words. Pierre Delecto.

Yes, a sham impeachment that allows no testimony from people who sounded the alarm the day of the perfect phone call, like Pence's assistant, and the others. Nothing so much the call was moved to a top secret server to limit access- that sham?

Oh you mean the call where the transcript was released by Trump even though he didn't have to? That call? The transcript of the call that was moved to a top secret server just like Obama, according to Susan Rice, used to do? That call? No crime, no victim, sham witnesses to the call who under oath said they didn't think there was any impeachable offenses, case closed. Stop your whining.

Call Bolton, Drump, Pompeo, - what is he hiding besides the truth. Id call Stormy as a character witness- he never had sex with her either or paid her, right? Chucklehead!

Schiff did subpoena Bolton then withdrew it as he wanted to rush the impeachment through.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

False.

True
“Democratic leaders, who had characterized Bolton, Mulvaney, and others as critical witnesses, did not lift as much as a finger to compel their testimony. Pelosi and Schumer held strategy sessions, and, after the House passed impeachment articles, Schumer demanded that witnesses whom the House did not even try to compel to testify absolutely must testify before the Senate.”
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/analysis-behind-boltons-decision

I'm assuming you're saying my statement of "false" is true..?...

"It seems likely that some, or perhaps all, of the conversations between Bolton and the president, or Mulvaney and the president, would be covered by executive privilege."

..maybe thats why they tried to subpoena Bolton's deputy instead. Idk.

If Bolton is lying to sell books, great. Allow witnesses, put him on the stand, and catch him in the lie.

What’s true is that Schiff didn’t try to get Bolton to testify at the House hearings.

Ok.. Nobody here was claiming otherwise... (?)

I'm probably going to have to read his book.. possibly after Trump is out of office because I understand they're trying to block that too.

"House investigators did ask Bolton to testify during the impeachment inquiry last fall, but he declined to testify on instructions from the White House and said he would only testify pursuant to a subpoena if a court weighed in on the issue. The House never subpoenaed Bolton, likely to avoid a drawn-out court battle."

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/homenews/administration/480040-trump-falsely-claims-house-democrats-never-asked-bolton-to-testify%3famp

Hence they rushed it through.

What are the Dems hiding besides the truth. I'm sure you don't care about any of their indiscretions at all do you. You supporting this sham, with no crime or victims, shows that you don't care about the damage the Dems are doing to this country. Party first, Cucklehead!

but for clarification the dems are keeping those people that have first hand evidence from testifying? So they dont want Bolton, Pompeo,Pence to testify because they are afraid of what they might say? Nice point- i never considered the old switch a roo theory.

You do know that you can say anything in a, NSC leaked to the press, manuscript, but it doesn't make it true or evidence or proof. The call manuscript spoke for itself. As a policy matter, the President did not have to give aid and/or arms to Ukraine if he didn't want to, which was delivered before they knew it had been temporarily frozen anyways, and he should investigate any corruption and/or election meddling which actually started in 2016 during the Obama administration. Show me the crime, not a thought crime, and the victim and perhaps you will be more believable.

I like the WH lawyers that said, if he did it, it still isnt a crime. That is taking a strong stance of, well, nothing. Why didnt he ask his WH to investigate corruption in Ukraine, but instead asked for an investigation at the exact time, not 2 years before, Biden was the leading Dem? i dont believe in political coincidences. Like he released the money AFTER he was told about the whistle blower. the manuscript wasnt word for word, you know that right? The WH hid this phone call in an escalated server to restrict access, because he was only asking for someone to look into Ukraine?
Nothing adds up, the dates dont add up, his story doesnt and his witnesses that know are blocked from testimony. If this was Hilary, would you feel the same. She was investigated 12 times over Benghazi, you know that too? Dumpy works for us, not his family business.

Not all things add up in life. Politics is a very gray area. However, we typically indict, prosecute, and convict based on crimes and there being a victim. I know this is not a criminal but rather a political trial, but if you are trying to impeach based on a high crime then what is the crime and what constitutes being a high crime? It is completely undefined. So I keep asking you and others over and over and over again. What is the crime? And I get crickets. If the crime is whatever Congress says it is then every President should be impeached and thrown out of office at a political whim.

the crime was asking at a time when Biden was the front runner to be investigated. Not 2 years prior. It wasnt asking to look into corruption in Ukraine, it was about 1 person. If you have a problem with his son being over paid, i am sure you question Ivanka and Jared making 75 million last year as, whatever they do for the WH and doing their "day jobs" without conflict??
Look up Lyndsey's Graham guideline when impeaching Clinton what a high crime was, or if you prefer a legal scholar, look up Dershiwitz comments during Clinton impeachment. That might help.
Let's face it, Clinton was impeached for lying about getting a bj, lying was a crime back then when the POTUS did it. My how things have changed, We have a potus that grabs women by the pussy, his ex wife under oath, accused him of rape, and he has paid out millions for his fraud businesses, and no one cares now?

Lying isn't a crime. Lying under oath is. It's called perjury, li'l guy.

Also look up what Nadler, Schumer and other dems said about Bill's impeachment.

"and moving forward after all the "fraudulent crimes" how will the GOP hold any dem to any standard? The GOP used to be the party of Family values, fiscal responsibility now we have a pussy grabbing, cheating on spouses, a war dodger, and claims to be a Christian but attends golf courses on Sunday's, uses the Lord's name in vain..."

So the same could be asked of how the Dems can hold any GOP member to any standard with the likes of Bill Clinton and Al Franken. So if you want to play that game then you might as well throw many politicians, including Democrats, out of office for sleaze, abuse of power and corruption.

Neither party has been fiscally responsible pretty much ever.

The only way to possibly change stuff like this is by giving power back to the states through the Convention of States.

Bill Clinton was impeached. Franken quit, if you are suggesting Dumpy should follow one of those paths, i agree.The problem is Dumps morals are so low, they cant be measured.
The State power is ok,unless it goes against the party- legal weed, gambling, abortion rights, gun laws- if it isnt what the Feds want then they want to step on it.