Liberal Logic - Killing Terrorists

That is clearly what those dumbasses are saying. To hell with the intel that caught them planning attack on our warships, our troops where they sleep, our diplomats and other American assets. Trump saved many lives! Now if they are dumb enough to retaliate, we HIT even harder! We can't turn a blind eye to them killing are people! That POS had the blood of over 600 American troops on his hands! You care more about politics then you do American lives if you whine about this Monster being killed!

what about the Undisclosed Document Stating how many innocent civilians were caught in the blast, Do they get a say as well? It was a public airport afterall

It was on the tarmac. The individuals you speak of were his entourage and those who came to pick him up. So, let us pity the terrorist entourage!

And yet their civilians continue to cry at his funeral and chant "death to America." But yeah, let's keep crying over a handful of civilians.

technically, killing terrorists will only create more terrorists. they regroup faster than we can drone-strike 'em

Waffle giving new meaning to special kind of stupid

we can't win against them with a war

And why the fck not? Technically winning against them would be dropping nukes on their country. Game over.

But do we really want to do that? Not really. There are other alternatives. Stop doubting the most, it if not, one if the most powerful countries in the world. Superior surveillance and strategic bombing will ensure they never have the upper hand. The US could continually bomb and assassinate any of their government officials too. If they wanted.

The only way the US could possibly lose is if other 1st world nations cuck and side with Iran. But why would they do that when they know Iran would just turn on them?

"Stop doubting the most, it if not, one if the most powerful countries in the world"

when we win afghanistan, i'll stop doubting the us.

No one can "win" Afghanistan. What does that even mean?

The drone strikes on Iran's #2 wasn't even about "winning" Iran. It was a preemptive strike to save American lives, kill a mass murderer, and send a message.

Yeah, ‘cause not retaliating has worked so well in the past 🙄

if we're trying to stop terrorism, it'll progress as much as the war in afghanistan has in the past 18 years.

So, again. OP.

I guess just leave them alone and let them kill us anyway?

we can't win against them with a war

We aren't technically at war with them. We're killing the individuals and the left continue crying over it.

"We're killing the individuals"

they still keep producing more faster than we can find them

So let's just leave them alone to continue murdering? Sounds about what you dipshits would say.

anticipate terrorist attacks instead? focus more on home security instead of spending tax money to do essentially nothing overseas?

HE'S KILLING AMERICANS, YOU IGNORANT FOOL. How hard is that for you to understand? Their government murders their own people for being gay. You think those citizens protesting America is real?? You think they're mourning their dead General? No! They're being forced to do this by their own government. North Korea does this too. Forced mourning and if you don't mourn hard enough or long enough, you're killed.

eyyy gotta love caps and name-calling.

"How hard is that for you to understand? Their government murders their own people for being gay. You think those citizens protesting America is real?? "

i don't think any of this is fake. but we can't change them, no matter how many drones attack them.

You're not getting the point. The Iranian citizens aren't cry because they feel bad about their general being killed, they're crying and shouting because they're being forced to.

And if you can't handle being called an ignorant fool then quit acting like one. One of the least offensive and vulgar names in the book.

"You're not getting the point. The Iranian citizens aren't cry because they feel bad about their general being killed, they're crying and shouting because they're being forced to."

regardless, they will be ordered to fight, win, and replicate if we set foot in iranian sand.

"And if you can't handle being called an ignorant fool then quit acting like one. One of the least offensive and vulgar names in the book."

name-calling i can handle. it's the fact that you're typing in all caps that bothers me; i thought you were better than that.

Yes, anticipate terrorist attacks instead. So tell me, when you know they're plotting a very specific attack on something... then what? Sit around with your thumb up your ass?

then defend, not attack

HOW do you "defend"? Elaborate.

Wouldn't you think at some point defending necessitates an action that is considered offensive?

Better yet, is always being on the defensive a tactically good thing? I'd think not.

Yeah because we can depend on home security, do you also live in a glass ball so that you do not get germs? Eventually you will run out of air and die inside the ball. You are just a pussy brain washed individual.

They will kill us they're not stupid

Did you miss the bit where McGowan apologized and literally asked Iran Not to kill us

or all the Media talk about Iran's potential retaliation/escalation or how Trump only did this as a distraction

because then you simply haven't been paying attention...

Spock would be logical and research it rather than spouting off like an imbecile.