Fox vs. Dog

Dated and raped and different.

Not to mention, her bogus story is a Law and Order Special Victim's Unit story plot.

Where exactly are his valid r@pe accusers? I haven't seen one yet. Remember, consentual s3x isn't r@pe no matter how hard the feminazis claim it is.

There have been over 27. Turn off fox news.

Fox news has more actual news in one hour than CNN and MSNBC has in an entire week. That being said, I asked you where are his VALID r@pe accusers. And women he had consensual s3x with doesn't count since it isn't r@pe. If you can't answer my question, then don't answer at all.

if you want "real news" your only options are PBS, BBC, Newsy, or the Christian Science Monitor

I didn't say Fox news was real news. I said it has more actual news in one hour than CNN and MSNBC does in one week. What does that say about CNN and MSNBC? Try not only reading what I say but understanding what I say as well.

Actual news can be anything from a news story that is stretched and twisted to a fabricated story to fit your narrative. It's still a news story, just a garbage news story. A real news story is something that actually happens and you report it.

That clarification is free.

Wrong

Not rape, dumbass. Try again.

Yep. So do I. I'm a man, so I don't like grabbing dicks unless it's my own.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/310835987/Donald-Trump-Lawsuit - not even included in the 27.. friggen moron.

Damn. Look at those low-rated comments of yours.

Some people just can't take truth. smh

Which is why I deleted it... Unlike you, who never question your low brow replies.

Okay.

So.

You're saying that Donald Trump couldn't possibly have sexually assaulted a woman in 1994 because you don't approve of the way she looks today?

BUT you do approve of the way the woman he was cheating on his wife with at the time in 1994, so that makes it...okay?... that he was cheating on his wife?

And by extension, that it would have been okay for him to sexually assault her because you find her attractive?

Cheating on his wife is morally wrong, but since when do the baby-killing, drag queen supporting, pedophiles on the left give two shits about morality? I guess only when Trump does something morally wrong, huh? And this isn't even about adultery, it's about another unsubstantiated case of r@pe or attempted r@pe. Guilty until proven innocent against someone you hate, huh?

lol well said.

Dressing in women's clothing isn't even immoral! It's weird, but who gives a shit? It's a free country. Or at least it used to be. This personality cult is absolutely insane. Are you going to put up giant murals of Trump like they have in North Korea and Saddam's Iraq?

Are you going to continue pretending cross dressing is a completely sane hobby?

Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, is it?

Jesus, you're dumb. Putting people in mental hospitals where they can get some kind of help isn't the same thing as throwing them in the "gulag." I guess you think we should just ignore the problem and maybe it'll go away? A lot of mentally unstable people walking around and your only solution is to ignore it.

So you're going to lock people up in mental institutions for wearing weird clothes?

I read everything you said, guy. When you quit saying ignorant things, I'll quit responding in kind.

You clearly didn't read what I said.

Yes I did.

So which part of "men dressing in women's clothes is weird" did you have trouble understanding?

I didn't have trouble understanding any of it. You think it's weird. Still doesn't address why you think we should ignore it as we do with gay people. Insanity should not be ignored.

So you don't believe in freedom? You think we should throw people in gulags if they dress the wrong way?

but since when do the baby-killing, drag queen supporting, pedophiles on the left """' Seriously dude, you live in a town of under 2k people and 80% hs dropouts? cause thats what you sound like.

Who actually shit you in the brain?

Shit me in the brain? English, maybe?

They have a strange kind of idea of innocence and guilt.

If Fox News tells them a pizza parlor is a child sex ring, they shoot it up without question. If over 20 women come forward with credible claims, they say "Yeah, but she isn't hot enough"

They?

If 27 women claimed that you raped them, you'd be in jail most likely. That's because in the case of most people there is little or no ulterior motive. Celebrities and politicians are different cases, because there is usually at least one ulterior motive. The definition of credible changes.

A woman's claim isn't credible just because you believe her. The fact that you don't want to believe her doesn't mean her claim isn't credible. The number of claims doesn't create credibility in this case, either, due to the reasons mentioned above and the fact that Trump is known to have paid people off in the past.

People who hate Trump irrationally are as quick to believe such claims as those who love him unconditionally are to dismiss them.

He's admitted to most of the things, including wanting to f**k his own daughter, walking into the MISS Teen pagaents he owned to watch girls change, and paying hookers.

Are you really going with the "Couldn't be him? all these girls are lying" route?

No. I'm saying number do not make them credible. For all I know, he did it.

yea, hes innocent. smh

ttps://i.imgflip.com/20f68v.jpg

You dropped an H

Good catch. Thank you!