I support prosecuting anything that was illegal. I don't support prosecuting just for the sake of prosecuting, nor do I support ignorant fuks that change the definitions of words so that they can label people things like "traitor" simply because they don't know the rule of law from their asshole. The people plotting to force him from office, if a violation of the law, should be prosecuted. I'm not questioning that. But until we know the circumstances behind the the plot, I reserve judgement. Some were a part of a conspiracy that began before he was elected. Others may have simply been a part of a group who genuinely believed that there was a unduly elected president and were seeking to use the law to get rid of the president they believed has colluded with Russia to become president. The totality of the facts need to come out before we rush to judge everyone there. You're obviously not capable of thinking on that level, as is evident by your fallacious attempt to define "treason" to fit your narrative and hold people accountable to the your definition even when that doesn't work in the real world. You're a walking fallacy and the very reason conservatives get ridiculed by educated leftists; an idiot who would destroy his own army of support because that had the audacity to ask the question, "Why"? Take your psuedo-intelligence and shove it up your literal ass. Conservatives don't need shit for brains people like yourself speaking for them.