Imgflip Logo Icon

Desire to disarm the population is the desire for absolute power.

Desire to disarm the population is the desire for absolute power. | EVERY GENOCIDE IS DIFFERENT; BUT EVERY GENOCIDE STARTS WITH GUN CONTROL | image tagged in despots,dictators,genocide,holocaust,gun control,disarm | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
5,921 views 63 upvotes Made by Stavka100 5 years ago in politics
black blank memeCaption this Meme
121 Comments
9 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Again ignorance on imgflip abounds, the Germans banned all firearms in 1919 after WWI, the Nazis actually relaxed gun control in the 30s and they actually lower the legal age to 18.

So you argument is null and void. Maybe you accidentally shot yourself in the head and suffered brain damage or are on the payroll of the NRA.
8 ups, 5y,
2 replies
To add to MozaisMyhero- if you were a member of the Nazi Party, there were no restrictions on what kind of gun you could own. You really need to learn actual history.
[deleted]
3 ups, 5y
If you were a Nazi.......... Of course they would let their own have Weapons
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Pretty much everyone became a member of the Nazi party from the Hitler youth up, the only people that didn't have the guns were a few hundred thousand jews, but yeah if they had guns they would have held off the whole German population on their own just like the Warsaw uprising..... oh wait all those armed Jews got slaughter by the Germans, their guns didn't do them much good.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
You mean the ones that were counting on russian relief before the communists decided to let them be slaughtered so they wouldn't have to deal with free poles in occupied poland?
0 ups, 5y
Pretty clear what Mozais means there.
Read it again, or look it up. Don't be shy with applying logic either, as much as it may harsh your mood.
5 ups, 5y
That's exactly the point mazais, gun control wasn't passed by nazis, or stalin or mao, it was passed by ruling governments before them and for non-nefarious reasons. However, this created a monopoly on force by government and criminal classes. And when despotic regimes took over, they had the means to do whatever they want to a defenseless population where only a few guns controlled thousands of lives.
4 ups, 5y
not knowing how history went to own the libs :sunglasses:
4 ups, 5y
5 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Whereas Americans are so much better, they like the gamble of their kids not coming home from school, because they might get shot dead! So exciting!
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Ok mozaisMyhero if you dont live in the United States you can shut the hell up. and if you do live in the United States then you dont know what you are talking about you are more likely to get in a car accident or get struck by lightning than be a victim in a school shooting and if you believe the statistics that say that there are 35 ¨violent¨ gun deaths every day in the U.S that is including suicides and fire arm accidents the real number is much lower I can´t recall the exact number but do your f**king research Schweinescheiße
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Nope, I don't live in the US but freedom of speech means I can say what I want. Unless you want to find me and shoot me but then that would prove my point....

It seems you are happy with dead kids on school grounds because more people die in car accidents, but ignore that other developed countries do not have this problem.
1 up, 5y
ok I am ONLY stating statistics Not things I am happy with I dont like car accidents and people dieing from them nor school shootings but that is two of the joker cards life put in are decks
[deleted]
6 ups, 5y,
1 reply
7 ups, 5y,
2 replies
I guess superior military technology is why the Vietcong lost the Vietnam war, amirite?
[deleted]
7 ups, 5y,
7 replies
So you think you got a chance against TODAYS US military, the one you tout as the greatest military in the world? You really think your "well regulated malitia" is gonna take on seal team 6 or any other branch of the military? You've seen the videos of what they can do no? It's a very thin argument.
[deleted]
11 ups, 5y,
1 reply
[deleted]
5 ups, 5y,
1 reply
You do understand what is wanted in gun control right? Do you have any understanding of how gun control works in Canada and other countries, basic models of sensible gun laws? Not the right wing fear mongering rhetoric, but what they are actually asking for? Short answer, it's not disarming.
[deleted]
12 ups, 5y,
3 replies
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Yes because any potus or Congress, even one like dipshit nationalist trump is going to slaughter the US citizens that have no guns.... you people are just FREAKS... and not the good kind
[deleted]
2 ups, 5y,
2 replies
3 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Its called VOTING... and NOT voting for freaks like trump that think they are above the law. Why dont you read the transcripts from his university fraud trial.... if you cant see what a crook he is after reading his own testimony, than you really are not just ignorant but a real life sucker and fool.
[deleted]
5 ups, 5y,
3 replies
3 ups, 5y
Really? Because grabbing women by the pussy is not against the law? Cheating on taxes not against the law? Meeting with foreign enemies to rig an election is not against the law? Ripping off desperate people with a bogus school is not against the law? Threatening witnesses is not against the law?
2 ups, 5y
Grabbing them without their consent is. Trump didn't do that.""' JFC you are the 3rd biggest drumpf sycophant here...
2 ups, 5y
you have an opinion on it without even reading it. You know what that is the very definition of?
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
In case you haven't noticed, Timby's 'argument' is always, "I know you are but what am I, you leftist, Trump is innocent of the crimes he's guilty of committing."
3 ups, 5y
Owen by timber again, poor little vaggybloodslave.
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
FREAKS and WHACKJOBS
3 ups, 5y
The second amendment is there because we had no army. Deal with that fact. It simply does not apply today. - And yes you did pick Davos, and every other idiot that mr peter principle reality tv schmuck picks for any position.
3 ups, 5y
No. I do believe that... and the maga folks are the biggest threat as they seem the least educated. Freaks thinking guns will protect the first amendment and our system, NO everything trump attacks is what makes us America and what do you care about education? Davos much?
[deleted]
5 ups, 5y
That's the propaganda you are talking about, it's not a complete disarmament, you choose not to understand. And that's the right wing conspiracy.
[deleted]
5 ups, 5y,
2 replies
At any rate, it's late and you're tiring
[deleted]
8 ups, 5y,
2 replies
5 ups, 5y
I'll second that
2 ups, 5y
Start using the term "Never-Trumpers" , because that's all it is . No facts , just hate
1 up, 5y
It served to show how out of touch you are
[deleted]
9 ups, 5y,
1 reply
[deleted]
5 ups, 5y
What part is that? Enlighten me in regards to this meme.
9 ups, 5y,
3 replies
Afghan goatherders with 100-year-old rifles take out SEALS with disturbing regularity. In fact, what they lack in military technology they make up with persistence, tenacity, and patience. Every modern military has been driven from Afghanistan. Now if a bunch of backwards goatherders can do that, what do you suppose a well-armed citizenry composed of a GREAT MANY combat veterans who understand guerrilla warfare could do? STOP. Don't answer, you'll just show yet again what an ass you are.
6 ups, 5y
Spot on Patriot
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
0 ups, 5y
LOL
2 ups, 5y,
2 replies
I agree. Every US Citizen should have the right to buy as many 100 year old rifles as they want.

Regulate the shit out all other guns.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
You mom called. Said to take the dick outta your butt and head home.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
She didn’t call.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
You are right. She told me after i took madik outta her butt
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
You didn’t do that.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
You are right. But you where daydreaming i did.
0 ups, 5y
no i wasn't
0 ups, 5y
7 ups, 5y,
3 replies
Yeah, the government could wipe out lots, agree there. But I doubt every soldier would kill their own civilians. But a 100 million people with guns would make any tyrant think twice. You can't patrol the streets with jet fighters.
[deleted]
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
If they want it they'll take it, but we all know that will never happen, but it's a good threat to cling to and use as an excuse.
[deleted]
6 ups, 5y,
1 reply
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Yes anyone not for reasonable gun control, is a stockpiling trigger happy freak just itching to shoot someone, like, well, like ALL the mass shooters have been.
[deleted]
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
1 up, 5y,
2 replies
Listen... I know its hard for you to get this through your hillbilly skull... but YOUR GO***AMN ASSAULT RIFLES are WORTHLESS against DRONES AND TANKS... and IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN IN AMERICA ANYWAY... we have this thing called the CONSTITUTION and VOTING and DESPITE trumps and putins and kims and xi's attempts to dismantle it all - AINT GONNA HAPPEN... and we DO NOT NEED GUNS to prevent it..... jfc..
3 ups, 5y
Look at you tamp your feet little white bunny
1 up, 5y
Could you record your next tantrum and post it please? I'd really like to see the look on your face while you type this garbage.
3 ups, 5y
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Gee, how is it the Afghanistan war is the longest in US history?
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
ffs
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Say someone who know nithing of the military service
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
1 up, 5y
Still waiting on you to google DD-214, musy be busy snuggling that bloody teddy, layoncock
6 ups, 5y,
2 replies
What nations fear about the Chinese military is not the nukes or the arms or the war tech, but the fact that they are by far the most numerous army with over 2 million conscripts at any time. No other nation gets even close. But here in US with the citizen militia treated as intended, we have an army of over 40 million soldiers, all ready for urban and guerilla warfare.
4 ups, 5y
[deleted]
6 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Aall in all it's just paranoia that drives you and need to have weapons. And a pretty convenient excuse to cling to the second amendmant. Nobody is tryna take your guns, but that's what you all fail to understand or even try to understand what is asked for in sensible gun laws. The world has come a long way, too bad you haven't. Ssshhhh, they're listening.....
[deleted]
8 ups, 5y,
2 replies
[deleted]
6 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Paranoid and cynical. You must be fun around the hollidays, sittin in the corner, grinding your axe, muttering to yourself and stewing about the left.
[deleted]
7 ups, 5y,
1 reply
[deleted]
5 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Speaking of melt downs, how bout that trump character eh?
1 up, 5y,
2 replies
[deleted]
3 ups, 5y
That guy has a melt down everyday like a petulant little child.
Didn't have a good trip to France, rage tweet about fires, leaves France, rage tweets about Macron, wakes up first thing in the morning, rage tweet. Oh he's a stable genious alright.
2 ups, 5y
Ya ever think just MAYBE Trump tweets to troll you libtards??
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Thanks for reminding us of why the cons need to be stopped.
[deleted]
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
1 up, 5y
2 ups, 5y,
4 replies
Your so-called sensible gun laws already exist in Commiefornia, but that doesn't stop the criminals any. Gun control isnt about guns, it's about control, and Liberals want to control the shit outta everything. Even the frickin 1st Amendment.
1 up, 5y,
2 replies
1st amendment? Funny I dont remember Obama ever attacking the press, even the idiots questioning his birth certificate. Like the head idiot does.
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Never attacking the press, huh? Selective memory much?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Rosen_(journalist)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/justice-departments-scrutiny-of-fox-news-reporter-james-rosen-in-leak-case-draws-fire/2013/05/20/c6289eba-c162-11e2-8bd8-2788030e6b44_story.html?utm_term=.21bbbc560b7f
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
2 ups, 5y
LOL Riiiiiiiiight.
From The Washington Post story: "Steven Aftergood, director of the project on government security at the federation of American scientists, said "Asking for information has never been deemed a crime." Also "No reporter has ever been prosecuted for seeking classified information."
And that was in response to your claim "I don't remember Obama ever attacking the press."

Nice try in moving the goalposts.
1 up, 5y,
2 replies
Oh ye of short memories. Obama banned a FOX News reporter, forgot the name it was so long ago. I'm not going to go so far as to say he kicked out Fox altogether.

As for Waco, all the firearms that the Branch Davidians had were actually being sold by a friend of the congregation at a Texas gun show (the guy was an FFL licensee). They had few firearms on hand, but the whole point is the BATF had tanks and military helicopters with mounted machine guns on them.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Just a "few"....... "" 22 AR-15s , 20 AK-47s,46 semi-automatic firearms modified to fire in full automatic mode ""... and btw who shot first? - https://www.justice.gov/archives/publications/waco/report-deputy-attorney-general-events-waco-texas-aftermath-april-19-fire
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
So you believe everything the government tells you. You're a world-class idiot.
1 up, 5y
Yes, its all a big conspiracy, 100's of people lying under oath... I did not believe the WMD's... yet the right wing idiots did. Well except for the Dixie Chicks, who the right wing idiots turned against. You seem to believe infowars... so we all know who the idiot here is.
1 up, 5y
1 up, 5y
1 up, 5y
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Its not like he was taking underage multiple brides or anything... oh wait it was exactly like that.... You a fan of his are you?
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
The underage 'wives' was the ranting of some disgruntled ex-members. The local Sheriff fully investigated that and closed the case for having ZERO evidence. The feds picked up the claim as an excuse to raid the place, and it was not for actual illegal firearms. The real reason had to do with a couple of the congregation who hacked into the BATF database (they were pre-internet hackers). BATF backtraced the connection and figured out who had hacked them. Not a fan of his, but on the other hand the government has NO business picking and choosing what religious groups they don't like and call a 'cult'. Incidentally where was all the liberal outrage at an armed massacre of children? Could it be because homicidal maniacs in government uniform are morally superior to civilian killers, in the minds of liberals?
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
More than Sandy Hook huh? Btw, do you know what Cyanide is? You are a whackjob consipircy nut. The davidans sold weapons at gun shows, THAT is how they caught on to them. I was there in Texas, when it happened. Do not try to feed me your bullshit. Get an education on what really happened, find THREE different sources and read them all.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Go f**k yourself. I know how to look into things, I was in local law enforcement at the time and everyone in the station agreed the feds were way outta bounds... and that opinion was shared by our friendly local ex-ATF agent. There is nothing wrong with selling firearms at gun shows, especially through an FFL licensee. I don't care if you lived next door to them, you really REALLY DONT KNOW SHIT, BUT YOU ARE DEFINITELY FULL OF IT. You wouldnty know truth if it walked up and bitch slapped you!
1 up, 5y
Says the dude who thinks more kids were shot and killed at Waco than Sandy Hook, .... btw no doubt the feds went about it the very very wrong way... but their motivation was legit.
2 ups, 5y
is called gorilla warfare are military is not that grate about fighting thows and we wound not need to fight are own military because part of there job is to protect the country from FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC that includes dictates and we have the constitution which guarantees certain rights that would help with dealing with a saturation like that
1 up, 5y
Someone needs to brush up on Posse Comitatas and the oathkeepers
0 ups, 5y
Show More Comments
black blank memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 6
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
EVERY GENOCIDE IS DIFFERENT; BUT EVERY GENOCIDE STARTS WITH GUN CONTROL