How convenient. Go cry me a river.

How convenient. Go cry me a river.  | THE LEFT SAYS CLINTON NEVER DID ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE WOMEN THAT CLAIM HE DID BECAUSE THERE'S NO PROOF BUT THEY HAVE ALREADY SAID BRETT KA | image tagged in memes,but thats none of my business,kermit the frog,brett kavanaugh | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
share
32,752 views, 184 upvotes, Made by SpursFanFromAround 3 months ago memesbut thats none of my businesskermit the frogbrett kavanaugh
But Thats None Of My Business memeRe-caption this meme
Add Meme
Post Comment
reply
21 ups, 4 replies
Guinean with straw | WE ALL KNOW THE MEDIA EFFECTIVELY MAKES THE RULES DIFFERENT FOR LIBERALS | image tagged in guinean with straw | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
7 ups
First rule of the Fight Club | THE FIRST RULE OF FIGHT CLUB, IS YOU DON'T TALK ABOUT FIGHT CLUB BECAUSE WE'LL BE BOMBARDED BY THE MEDIA IF WE DO! | image tagged in first rule of the fight club | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
4 ups
Hunger Games - Caesar Flickerman (Stanley Tucci) | THE MEDIA NEVER REPORTED BILL'S PHILANDERING, RAPING AND EXPLOITING (SOMEONE ELSE MUST HAVE) SO LET'S GET THE SOB BECAUSE WE JUST REMEMBERED | image tagged in hunger games - caesar flickerman stanley tucci | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
2 ups
Yeah, liberals are required to be evidence based. Conservatives are content with bumper stickers.
reply
4 ups, 2 replies
LIKE THIS FORMER   PRESIDENT      THAT NEVER WAS | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
And because Jennifer Flowes, Paula Jones, Monica Lewinski and whatever others Billy Bob Clinton mussed with never happened.

Seriously, are any of the alt righters on this site old enough to vote or do they even know anything about American politicians from wherever gulag in Siberia they've been bubble wrapped all their short lives? It's like they've literally been born yesterday, or 2016, anyways.
reply
1 up
Change My Mind | I AM RIGHT | image tagged in change my mind | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Hart issued a Carte Blanche Challenge to the Media to prove something he knew to be true, and failed miserably to hide... Encyclopedia Brown could have exposed Harts infidelities...
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Aaaaaaaand his run was OVER because of it.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
and 4 Years Later Bill had Multiple Mistresses come to light and Nothing happened,

Because coverage of Hart 'moved the goal post'...

in 1988 Clinton "Not Inhaling" and Fleeing the Draft (Via Favors, Lies and Loopholes) would have been just as deadly to his political career...

His 'getting away with it' in 1992 perfectly Paved the way for W's "Youthful Indiscretions" and National Guard on the Gulf Coast and like it or not even Trump's 'Bone Spurs'...

Just like W's 'Youthful indiscretions' allowed Obama to admit to his relationship with Coke

and Their 1992 Campaign witticism of "It's like getting two for the Price of One." sounded cool at the time, but it meant that when SHE tried to run, she was Judged by his actions... Because THEY Told us to.

Imagine how much easier it'd be stop cries of "Fake news!"... if some one hadn't claimed a 'Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" was responsible whenever things didn't go their way
reply
1 up, 1 reply
"Their 1992 Campaign witticism of "It's like getting two for the Price of One." "

That sounded unfamiliar, altho I was busy trying to not pay attention back then by hanging out at school till I had to sleep.... Googled it, nothing turned up.

Don't recall the "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" talk either. If that's supposed to be attributed to the Mr Republican-in-disguise Clinton, can't see how. His, "Ouch, don't twist my arm so hard, I'll sign it"isms beg to differ.

Regardless, "Fake news!" is the current guy's mantra, doubtful events from previous administrations would have altered that spiel or the acceptance of. People eat it up, therefore he does it.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
1998: Hillary quoted a 1995 Opposition Research Memo and described the Impeachment as a part of a "Vast right wing Conspiracy" AGAINST Them... Wiki the Phrase, they have citations...

and all you need is to search 'Clintons two for one'... Not that hard to Turn up Proof of that Either...

and FYI... My First Ballot was the Fall of '96, I Voted Clinton.
reply
0 ups
I tend to avoid hearing or looking at what Hillary says, so I missed that quote.

I saw that '88 DNC speech of Bill's, switched channels after I nearly slipped into a coma, switched back when I thought it was over, switched again because it still wasn't, then back just in time to catch the "in conclusion" to cheers ending. There wasn't enough caffiene and whisky to get me to vote for him after that.
So it was Bush Sr again for me.

The only thing I found worthwhile about Clinton was Conan O'Brian's fake 'via satellite interviews' with him...
reply
17 ups, 2 replies
reply
6 ups, 2 replies
Same goes for conservatives, Christians, Muslims, etc
reply
5 ups
A lot of groups disregarding facts these days it seems
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
But which party is the one known for getting TRIGGERD
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
Been on this site long? Seen the memes? Which are the meltdown temper tantrums?

They make the SJWS pests on another site I used to frequent look like they're luded out in comparison. And those were mainly British, so we're talking ultra militant blind-to-the-Pakis-popping-their-behinds vego feminazi SJWs, so the ire gets a dollop of smug blindness crusted with salt on top.

This cult of the Trump makes even devotees of Reagan back in the day embarrassed.
reply
0 ups
And I've seen people condone violence and hate your point is?
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
Both. I've seen conservatives fly into a tizzy when stuff offends them.
reply
3 ups
More like fly into a Hiroshima,,,
reply
1 up, 1 reply
But which one has more SJWs ?
reply
3 ups, 3 replies
I love how “social justice warrior” and “liberal” are insults by the right. These are people fighting for OTHER people. You may be one of those people someday.

It’s the classic conservative “I don’t care until it effects me” syndrome. Hate gays and gay rights.....has a gay kid. Views change. Hates Obamacare. Gets gravely Ill. and needs medical care....views change. Hates welfare, food stamps etc....loses job and needs social programs...views change. Complains about feminists....daughter suffers from sexists treatment, views change.

You get the idea.
reply
5 ups
Wrong, It's SJWs fighting against imaginary injustice, And liberals dividing people into groups to further a warped ideology.
reply
0 ups
How are they helping people? They just restrict free speech.
reply
0 ups
I'm not a damn conservative! I just think the right knows more than the left.
reply
14 ups, 1 reply
Seems like an unfair double standard. Upvote. i.imgflip.com/1puy80.gif (click to show)
reply
11 ups, 1 reply
I made this meme right after Brett got nominated.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
You were only off by 3 decades, but who cares about when it happened, because men in their 50s are the same exact person they were when they were just hitting puberty.
reply
1 up
You're only off by a decade and are being misogynistic.
Liberals are the exact same whiners they were as children as they are until death.
Female liberals are as bad as men. Don't discriminate.
reply
[deleted]
10 ups, 2 replies
reply
6 ups
reply
9 ups, 1 reply
reply
4 ups
reply
7 ups
reply
7 ups, 2 replies
Who said Brett Kavanaugh is guilty?
reply
12 ups, 2 replies
Feinstein and the rest of the loony left.
reply
8 ups, 1 reply
Now they want the FBI to investigate. News FLash! The FBI doesn't investigate vague, long-ago claims of state crimes where the statute of limitations has run out!

The appropriate venue for the investigation would be the state in which the incident is said to have taken place. Which means Ford would have to file a complaint in that state (she never did). Since the statute of limitations has run out for this type of alleged crime I doubt the police will open an investigation.

But, in the end, what is there to investigate? An unknown house at an unknown time. The accuser claims something happened in a room with 2 males that the 2 males insist couldn’t have occurred because they weren’t in the room with the accuser.
Supposedly there were 2 other males in the unknown house but the accuser doesn’t know who they were.

The accuser never told anyone at or near the time of the alleged incident. She never filed a police report. No one to date has stepped forward saying they knew about the alleged incident or that they were at the location.

There is no there there.
reply
[deleted]
7 ups, 1 reply
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
provide a credible link to death threats, Leftists sites don't count, They aren't credible.
reply
[deleted]
7 ups, 2 replies
Do your own f**king research next time. https://www.businessinsider.com/brett-kavanaugh-accuser-receives-death-threats-moves-out-of-house-hires-private-security-2018-9
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
chosanwan didn't believe you, so you provided a link, then Natalie just jumped in and threw a tantrum XD
reply
1 up, 1 reply
"A person familiar with the matter told The New York Times that Ford, a mother of two teenagers, began receiving vulgar emails and messages on social media."

A person "familiar with the matter"? LOL. Riiiiiiiiiiight. No witnesses, no one will corroborate the story, can't remember where she was exactly, can't remember how she got there, can't remember how she got home afterwards, doesn't mention his name for decades, then claims she told her therapist.

Dude, face it, this was yet another Democrat hit job with no there there.

In other news, I'm linking up with a Nigerian Princess who needs to hide $22.9 million dollars in my bank account for a few days and will let me keep half!
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
You find it hard to believe that someone who accuses a SCOTUS nominee of **pe would receive death threats?
reply
0 ups
We aren’t even allowed to see the letter that she wrote to Diane Feinstein. No I don’t believe her one bit. The left has had great success with sexual crime accusations. It’s now there go to move for almost any nominee or candidate. It’s so damn predictable.
reply
[deleted]
5 ups
reply
5 ups
Huh.. must've been after she said: "I can't say everything's truthful. I don't know."
- Sen. Dianne Feinstein
reply
1 up
Every liberal
reply
7 ups, 2 replies
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Mention Bill's name in any Forum discussing "Grab em by the ____"... You'll hear it, or technically read it...
reply
8 ups, 2 replies
reply
7 ups, 2 replies
Typical, A Meme that has nothing to do with President Trump, And you post a Meme about Trump. Sad.
reply
5 ups
But I understand how someone could easily make that assumption...
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
Hahahahahaha deflection of facts,!that's your whole opinion. Sorry those facts constantly triggere you lol
reply
2 ups, 4 replies
Damn... You're retarded, I've had 3 Memes on the front page while you're sitting here on a dated Meme Arguing with yourself.
reply
4 ups
Awwww lil retarded boy makes the front page, how cute. What does the front page prove lol? Does the front page make your opinion fact? Lol What does this front page claim prove about anything? Lol
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
This fool Opan_irl is continuing to argue with me on a 3 week old Meme here for attention. But don't let that stop you from making an ass of yourself...Again.
reply
0 ups
So you are doing exactly what I am doing LMFAO! You hilarious
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
LIAR, you have ZERO memes on the front page ! Hahahahahahaha you lie about everything hahahahahaha NO FRONT PAGE MEMES , LIAR!
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
I said had stupid... Past tense. You really are retarded
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
But you don't , present tense -you didn't past tense and you ain't ever on the front page LIAR!!! Who's your front page alt again? Lol
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
I enjoy laughing at your stupidity
0 ups
I like laughing at your lying no front page memeing having ass LMFAO your pathetic
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
Under that logic Raydog has the most front page memes and he says trump
Is a crook . So trumps a criminal under your front page meme logic LMFAO your retarded boy
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
You're still trying to be the biggest retard on Imgflip,
You have my vote.
I'm guessing your mom only allows you on the internet every few weeks, Tell her she needs to keep you off a little more.
reply
1 up
You still keep coming back lol.Then why not stop responding to me, you can't stop. You need me
reply
1 up, 1 reply
I'm not comparing my Memes with anyone else's. I stated a fact.
Now Raydog is your source, I'm sure he'll be impressed by that.
How stupid are you?
Don't answer, You'll take it as a challenge.
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
I didn't use anyone as a source but just stated facts that destroy your meme logic LMFAO So you admit front page meme don't matter right? Then why do you use your claim to front page memes as your source? Lol your cute lol Hahahahahahahahahahah you proved your own logic is bullshit hahahahahahhahaha but you brought up front page meme ! Hahahahahahahhaha and destroyed yourself hahahahahahah
reply
1 up, 1 reply
I knew you would take stupidity as a challenge, Congratulations you win.
1 up
No, you won stupid hands down with your tantrums and doing exactly what you call other members out for , you patheticly hilarious and the only reason I came back . So you can entertain me for free LOL keep the ignorance entertainment coming through self projection memes LMFAO
reply
1 up, 1 reply
I said you're stuck on a 3 week old Meme, When I've had 3 Memes on the front page. You could have been making an ass out of yourself on a new Meme for everyone to see. But you'd rather hide here. I get it.
0 ups
What the f**k is this thread?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
1 up, 1 reply
You mean like being found not guilty at his public impeachment trial but I don't mind educating you to actual historical fact lol
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
He was impeached but not removed from office. There's a difference.
I was alive at that time and remember what happened before he couldn't figure out what the definition of "is" is.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
I was also alive then.So you can't deny what I stated?
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Of course I can't deny it because it's true. He was acquitted of all charges by the Senate. However, he was impeached. Just not removed from office.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
So acquited ( found not guilty) so we agree on not guilty.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Technically, yes. He was acquitted. Even though there are numerous instances where he lied about the situation on TV he was ultimately acquitted.
1 up
So he is legaly not guilty of any crime after the courts have seen all the evidence,, right?no matter how anyone feels about it? And that because lewinski mouth hug lies had zero to do with the actual crimes being investigated, right?
reply
1 up, 2 replies
Once again you can't hear, Too busy being shouted down by liberals louder than you.
Maybe selective hearing?
reply
3 ups
I can hear perfectly well, thank you :)
reply
3 ups
Sorry liberals are oppressing your opinion and feels
reply
[deleted]
6 ups, 2 replies
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
Let's skip the months leading up to the confirmation hearings.
Let's skip the week long hearings designed to ask questions of a nominee.
Let's wait until it's time to vote, Then come forward with allegations from a registered Democrat and Anti-Trumper to delay the vote.
Lets use Democrats who have been shouting
"We will stop this appointment, No matter what it takes".
And here you are.
reply
[deleted]
6 ups, 2 replies
Dr. Ford was never going to bother accusing Kavanaugh previously because of the trouble and cost for very little; maybe he would have been professionally reprimanded?

But now, seeing as he is about to be confirmed to one of the most powerful positions in the world, she feels her personal experience matters in judging the character of the man...and I agree with her.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Uh huh. Of course you agree with her story, Liberals love fairly tales, Instead of facts.
It's good to know you think accusing someone of **pe isn't worth it when it happens, It costs too much and isn't worth putting a rapist in jail. It's better to wait 35 years, It's better to wait after the confirmation hearings, And then have sore loser Democrats try to stall the vote.
It isn't about an alleged **pe, Timing is what's important.
reply
[deleted]
6 ups, 1 reply
Like you all did with Merrick Garland? What's good for the goose, assholes.
reply
3 ups
This is supposed to be a debate about alleged **pe allegations, I Guess you can't debate. Asshole.
reply
[deleted]
6 ups, 2 replies
Yeah, if someone said that you were an accomplice to an attempted **pe, would you be admitting to it? Come on, use what little brain you seem to have since you can work a computer.
reply
1 up
Accomplice and witness are different things, Remember she's only accusing an esteemed judge. Maybe she will wait another 35 years to accuse this 3rd person.
But only if he's a Republican and running for office.
reply
[deleted]
6 ups
Natalie-vance; you are a case study in the necessity of stupidity being painful.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
No he didn't , he doesn't want to testify under oath to the congressional committee but I don't mind correcting you to the actual facts, NEXT!
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Put down the weed pipe jack
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
When you stop spreading lies(fake news)so you can't prove your not lying? Sounds like your a LIAR LMFAO
MAGA2020 My Attorney Got Arreeeested! MAGA2020 lol
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Hahahahah childish name callin, the last resort of a trump fail troll who's feels were hurt with facts lol
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Quite the contrary, I find triggered snowflakes to be amusing. I didn't call you or anyone else a name, just used my wit to disagree with a point that was made. Big difference.

I'm sorry that I don't all of the facts because I have better things to do instead of watching the news all day. I catch a look occasionally through the day but that's it. I don't know if Kavanaugh is hiding something, I don't know if Ford is being manipulated by democrats. I say give her a chance to speak and give him a chance to face his accuser. I think everyone should stop playing political games with a serious issue. I think Justices should have no political loyalty at all. I think the media should go away and let our system work.
0 ups
Saying I need to find a new drug dealer implies I'm a drug user but don't mind educating your lack of Witt to the what words mean and their definitions. So you admit you don't even keep up with facts but have an opinion based on your lack of factual knowledge of the situation . That's fake news LMFAO you destroyed your own opinion and proudly claim you don't keep up with facts LOL So you opinion isn't based in actual facts because you don't feel the need to keep up with facts , NEXT
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
They always get caught in their own BS.
reply
[deleted]
5 ups, 1 reply
reply
3 ups, 3 replies
Do you not know the difference between actual evidence and no evidence at all? Jesus, it's like I'm talking to children.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
You are talking to children. The Bernie Bunch :/
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Yeah, so it seems.

Haven't seen you around lately.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
been staying pretty busy. I see you're still fighting the good fight :) I think the one you just caught though, is a keeper. Maybe you should throw this one back and let it age a few more years :)
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
It's gotten crazy around here. Definitely not like it used to be.
reply
2 ups
I see some of the same trolls... all bravado, no substance
reply
1 up
You're trying to explain the mysteries of the universe to Jerry's Kids.
reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 1 reply
Whatever, f**ktard.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
[deleted]
5 ups, 2 replies
reply
2 ups
If you don't care then stop replying. lol
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
You all don't know what the word "evidence" means and when someone points it out to you, you call people "f**ktards."
reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 1 reply
I don't owe you a f**king argument, f**ktard. Do your own research. You know, personal responsibility.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Wow, you're an idiot.
reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 1 reply
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
[deleted]
3 ups
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Show me proof for any **pe case and I will believe it.
reply
7 ups, 3 replies
That's what I'm saying. There was a lot more proof with Clinton than there is with kavanaugh.
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
Yep. Sounds real credible to me. **pe victims have the facts seared into their brains. They don’t forget details that actually happened, This leftist college professor is doing damage to legit victims who will not be believed because of her political card playing at the expense of the truth. Once again the left has thrown women under the bus, backed up, and run over them twice for good measure.
reply
8 ups, 1 reply
Democrats aren’t even trying to hide their motivation.
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
So you don't like democrats using the same tactics republicans used to delay the vote. Republicans didn't even have a reason but it was fine then and it's fine now under republican logic but I don't mind educating you to historical facts lol
reply
1 up, 2 replies
I didn't say it was fine. But at least the Republicans didn't use exploit a possible **pe victim for their political purposes. Try educating yourself first :)
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
You mean the **pe victim that came forward to make this claim on her own free will? How is looking into her claim at her request using her agian? Don't be mad the republicans did the same exact thing with zero justification because it hurts your feels to see it done to republicans. You all are whiney when someone uses your own tactics lol
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
Wrong, the Republicans were straight forward that the reason they delayed it was so the new president would be able to nominate.
It’s no coincidence that this, supposed, **pe victim decided to come forward after 35 years at the 11th hour of appointing the new judge. She said she would testify, then changed her mind and wants an FBI investigation first. I doubt her decision for the investigation was her “free will”. The Democrats got her to do it as part of their political ploy to delay the vote. This is how Democrats are using her. Not even close to what the Republicans did.
reply
5 ups, 4 replies
Even if the Republicans were open about why they did it, it was still messed up to do it. If Democrats did the same thing, conservatives would be complaining. Oh, wait...
reply
2 ups
Just like the Democrats did then. Of course they thought Hillary was going to win the election so they weren’t too upset about it. But now they’re just desperate to do something - anything - to obstruct the Trump administration, including doing using another “Cindy Sheehan” as a mascot for their agenda.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
" would say it's wrong when either side does it :)" I can agree with what you said there, but it also presupposes that the republicans used cheap slanderous tactics which they did not. No one threw dirt at Garland and treated him disrespectfully. They just simply said its too close to an election and didn't vote on him. Like it or not they didn't go after him personally or throw out there some unsubstantiated claim from high school years. Although look out next democrat nominee, because that is probably what you will get now that the bar has been lowered yet again. Whether or not this happened I have no idea, but the time to start investigating it was in July.
0 ups
I agree that the Republicans didn't throw sexual assault allegations at Garland. I was referring more to them stonewalling him in general by refusing to give him a hearing.
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
Hmmm, so what I'm hearing you say is, because the Republicans overtly did something we feel was messed up, its okay for us to use cheap slanderous backstabbing tactics to try to achieve the same result.
1 up
I would say it's wrong when either side does it :)
1 up
That's the whole republican b b b b but Hillary claim and it still doesn't give trump immunity from any crimes he may have committed lol
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Well old friend, its easy to agree what didn't happen, didn't happen. How about we agree that at least the handling of the current issue true or not, was underhanded bullshit that will now plague any nominee for any post going forward for the foreseeable future. Anyone for any reason will now have the ability to through out some claim at the last minute to tie up any confirmation.
1 up
On that we can definitely agree :)
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
"I doubt" so this is just your opinion? Can you show any actual evidence beside your feels to back up your opinion?
reply
0 ups
You need proof that Republicans didn’t use a victim to delay the vote? Try reading the news.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
What **pe victim? At this point there is nothing more than her accusation, which is as worthwhile as me saying why did YOU **pe me while we were drunk at a party somewhere I was too drunk to remember and to drunk to even remember when. But I know it happened and your life should be ruined because of it.
reply
0 ups, 3 replies
So you are authorized to be told all the facts of the proceedings? Please tell us citizens where you get your opinion.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
I have the same facts as you are privileged to. For the record she is not accusing him of **pe but alleges sexual assault (that said because I am willing to giver the benefit of a doubt which you are clearly not willing to give Kavanaugh). Even she says she she was "outed" on the topic, I didn't whine and stating your not going to vote on a candidate from the beginning iiis a lot different tactic than throwing out 11th hour unsubstantiated criminal claims. Turn of the news,you clearly do not understand anything you hear.
0 ups
Sexual assault ( unlawful sexual activity)So **pe, but I don't mean educating you to the actual definition of the word you're using .

Definition of **pe (Entry 1 of 4)
1 : unlawful sexual activity and usually sexual intercourse carried out forcibly or under threat of injury against a person's will or with a person who is beneath a certain age or incapable of valid consent because of mental illness, mental deficiency, intoxication, unconsciousness, or deception — compare SEXUAL ASSAULT, STATUTORY **PE
reply
0 ups, 2 replies
As I suspected you either did not or were not capable of reading that and comprehending that intercourse was the defining element. Wait... do you know what intercourse is?
0 ups
Rape does not require penetration as stated by both Webster and legal definition I put literally in the comment you have zero arguement and your opinion is wrong by every definition but I don't mind correcting you again. I looked up your definition it's the exact same as the first one I gave you LOL she claimed he pinned her down covered her mouth and groped her. By both definitions that forceful sexual contact is **pe by both definition . You are wrong , NEXT!
0 ups
Just copy and paste any definition that supports your opinion and where it's from. It's that easy , but you can't . Because that's not what the word means but keep the entertainment coming LMFAO
reply
0 ups, 4 replies
Sexual assault does not equal **pe, **pe is the highest form of sexual assault and there are varying degrees of sexual assault. Please visit the following link and understand the legal definition of which you speak, instead of mimicking those who know better, but love to get people like yourself worked up. https://definitions.uslegal.com/r/rape/
0 ups
Even by the definition you tryed to site in the comment above says your wrong, your own source and every other source says your wrong. No matter how that might make you feel hahahahahahahah LMFAO
0 ups
Rape is a forceful sexual assault which is what she accuses him of , pinning her down and assaulting her physically , no matter how you feel about it . Please know the actual legal definition of which you speak , not your opinion on them , instead of mimicking those who know better, but loved to get uneducated people like yourself to think their opinion is factual and legal and all wrongly worked up about it . LMFAO your opinion isn't any definition anywhere LMFAO
0 ups
Except that's the websters dictionary definition actual definition of the word , lol. no matter how you feel about it
0 ups
The legal definition

Rape is a type of sexual assault initiated by one or more persons against another person without that person's consent. The act may be carried out by physical force, or where the person is under threat or manipulation, or with a person who is incapable of valid consent.

Is the same LMFAO, nice try though

Any sexual assault is a form o **pe by all definition legal or otherwise no matter what you feel the word means but I don't mind educating you to the actual definition again, NEXT!
reply
1 up
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
Yes, and he was impeached for LYING about it.

Did you just land on this planet in Nov 2016?
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
He was impeached for Lying about Infidelity via Monica's 'Mouth hug'

NOT his alleged criminal acts against Paula Jones and Juanita Broadrick (among others)
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Yes, THAT'S what he lied when questioned about at the time, THAT'S what he was impeached about.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
All this talk about Clinton's impeachment is moot. He was found not guilty.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Why is everyone replying to me what I clearly already stated in that meme?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
There was no credible proof which is why Clinton was found not guilty and you implied there is proof without showing any but I don't mind educating you to the actual meaning of the words you are using ????
reply
1 up, 5 replies
Yes, kindly define the words I used, and post the defintions here.

And kindly explain this implying which I did not do.

Here's the words for you to look up.
Google, dictionary, or your English teacher:

Bill

Clinton

was

impeached

for

perjury

and

obstruction

of

justice.

P-P-PERIOD

It's really not hat difficult to understand.

- Oh wait, it is.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
I'm saying the same Modda and got commenting tonyou by my mistake for sure, no prob bob. I'm saying the same . I was originally commenting with minisphinx and think I hit one of your to reply to him , totes my bad bro
1 up
Oh, ok, cool. Wasn't sure of you being sarcastic with the previous one.
reply
1 up
Just meme ing trying to get you to LOL
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Isn't my face read , I thought you were OP and the autocorrect is on meth not myself
1 up
I don't know what your issue is with me.
My Silkin Floss meme and the Gary Hart one were addressing those here claiming liberal media bias and why wasn't Clinton crucified, yadda yadda.

I did say up above I hadn't like him since '88, but I'm not going to pretend he was treated with kid gloves when he was impeached and raked over the coals.
reply
0 ups
Seriously my bad giving you a hard time wrongly, have a great weekend
reply
0 ups, 2 replies
Except he was found not guilty of those crimes and lewinski was a concentual relationship that had nothing to do with the crime he was originally investigated forbut I don't mind eduvcting you to historical fact

ev·i·dence
?ev?d?ns/Submit
noun
1.
the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.
"the study finds little evidence of overt discrimination"
synonyms: proof, confirmation, verification, substantiation, corroboration, affirmation, attestation
"they found evidence of his plotting"
verb
1.
be or show evidence of.
"that it has been populated from prehistoric times is evidenced by the remains of Neolithic buildings"
synonyms: indicate, show, reveal, display, exhibit, manifest; More

Which they didn't have on Billy which is why he was found not guilty . Your welcome for taking the time to educate you on the words

You would think know the meaning of word before you use them would be easy

-Oh wait you proved its not
1 up
"Opan_irl

Except he was found not guilty of those crimes and lewinski was a concentual relationship that had nothing to do with the crime he was originally investigated forbut I don't mind eduvcting you to historical fact

.....

Which they didn't have on Billy which is why he was found not guilty . Your welcome for taking the time to educate you on the words

You would think know the meaning of word before you use them would be easy

-Oh wait you proved its not"

Except that* he was found not guilty of those crimes and Lewinski* was a consensual* relationship that had nothing to do with the crime he was originally investigated for* but I don't mind educating* you on* this* historical fact

????? Which they didn't have on Billy which is why he was found not guilty .

You're* welcome for my* taking the time to educate you on the words

You would think knowing* the meaning of words* before you used* them would be easy

-Oh wait you proved it's* not

????There, fixed it for you.

???? You can't even spell, but I'm sure that's your Autocorrect's fault (or the meth). Thus, your lack of reading comprehension is hardly surprising.

R
E
A
D
what I said, look at the replies from the Trumpites for further illumination, scroll near the top and look at my meme which they had low rated for a day get further context, and get a clue.
1 up
on these* words

to* get further
reply
1 up
Like little st James island
reply
2 ups
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
reply
3 ups
reply
2 ups
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
If she is lying, why is she the one asking for a thorough investigation?
reply
1 up
Very brave to demand it of an agency that you know will not investigate it, because it is a state issue not federal. Her lawyer and the DNC are hiding her behind the FBI stalling for something they know will not happen. I have heard nothing about her filing charges with her local DA, the actual route you would take in this case.
reply
5 ups, 2 replies
A) Bill Clinton isn't the one being confirmed as a supreme court judge.

B) Show me a leftist who is actually trying to bat for him.
reply
4 ups, 2 replies
No, he was just president of the United States. No big deal.
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
reply
3 ups, 3 replies
Trump hasn't **ped anyone and there isn't any proof of it. Show some proof a don't accuse. That's not how it works.
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
"You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything." -Donald Trump
reply
4 ups
What a classy guy, that Trump is
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
but bill clinton did it right? smh you partisan hack
reply
4 ups, 2 replies
There was proof, you mental patient.
reply
2 ups
proof of what? a "consensual" relationship?
reply
1 up
Not of the crimes he was charged with , which had zero to do with lewinski, and was found not guilty but I don't mind educating you to the actual historical facts
reply
1 up
Seriously guy, what planet are you on?
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up
Alternative facts are now acceptable for everyone , not just ones that don't hurt trump cultists feels lol
reply
1 up
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up
It's all Mitch McConnell's fault.
reply
1 up
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
1 up
And neither does anyone else. lol. But she knows that it happened, dammit!
reply
3 ups
reply
1 up
Another strawman meme, sigh
reply
[deleted]
1 up
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 2 replies
Yeah, he resigned. And all of the rest of those people are out of office and/or blacklisted. Apply the same logic to this dick head Kavanaugh.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
EVIDENCE, idiot.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
^^ watch the caps please this is a kids' website
reply
0 ups
haha
reply
1 up, 2 replies
Do tell. No proof. Just another Liberal-MSM ploy to destroy a man life....It all about the lefts political agenda to hate trump....See how simple it is when you can think for you're self....
reply
[deleted]
6 ups, 1 reply
reply
0 ups
Funny, I don't support any party. Because they are both pure junk....You must only believe the MSM. Thanks for the unintelligent conversation on you're behaf..
reply
[deleted]
4 ups, 2 replies
So let her testify, then, if you all aren't afraid of it.
reply
1 up
They did and she said NO....Because all this is a distraction. It's the only play the left has....
reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
[deleted]
2 ups
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
It’s because the left is a bunch of retards.
reply
2 ups, 4 replies
No its because conservatives do not feel sexual assault is a crime and the the female who makes the calim is lying and if she comes forward you f*ggots threaten to kill her. Admit it you support Cavanaugh you do not feel **pe is a legitimate crime. You would rather assume she is lying than at least give the review anything. Never mind the fact you could have another justice appointed that is every bit if not more so conservative that the dems would support in the end. Sexual Assault is not a joke. If you think that sexual assault is nothing more that a political issues than I hope you oyur wife, daughter grand daughter son or grand son is sexually assaulted so that you can see that it is a laughing matter to be dismissed. The see how political it is.
reply
1 up
"If you think that sexual assault is nothing more that a political issues than I hope you oyur wife, daughter grand daughter son or grand son is sexually assaulted so that you can see that it is a laughing matter to be dismissed. The see how political it is."

Why you hope something so sick?
All it shows is that YOU think that sexual assault is nothing more than fodder for political issues.
reply
1 up
No one believes the sexual assualt because it only matters when they suddenly become president or run for office. This woman should be ashamed for coming forward when she can get publicty and not when it happened it shows her disregard for the seriousness or even if it's the truth
reply
1 up
bruh that's not how we argue around here.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up
WHAT IS ALL DIS ABOUT?!
Flip Settings
But Thats None Of My Business memeRe-caption this meme

Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator

IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
THE LEFT SAYS CLINTON NEVER DID ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE WOMEN THAT CLAIM HE DID BECAUSE THERE'S NO PROOF; BUT THEY HAVE ALREADY SAID BRETT KAVANAUGH IS GUILTY BASED OFF OF A WOMAN'S CLAIM WITH NO PROOF OF ANYTHING
hotkeys: D = random, W = like, S = dislike, A = back
Feedback