Liberals showing their true nature

Attractive people can be pretty bitchy as well.

I probably shouldn't, but:

You just described me, my entire family, and every single one of my friends. That's accurate as hell.

Tasteless photo, but don't drag Obama into this. He's gone, so stop making excuses.

He's gone?

He's not president anymore.

I wish someone would tell that to all the moles...

Busted!

lol

Nice! :)

No sh*t dude. Thank you! Trump does a curtsy and makes a.billions dollar arms deal with a country that's been funding terrorism for decades, where the majority of the 911 attackers came from, hello Osama bin ladins birthplace...not a peep from the gun totin commie haters....Some D list comedienne takes a clearly tongue in cheek photo and everyone is up in arms. I mean seriously , it's not like Kathy Griffin is even relevant anymore... or did she just become relevant all of a sudden...?

Thank you very much, well said.

Not to mention the gun totin commie haters are plastering former KGB Putin's posters on their walls.

That's way inaccurate. We're trying to stop those funds. You guys sure didn't seem to notice that until you decide to use them to back up Kathy.

Negative. Show any mainstream source that says any Republican or conservative tolerates or supports anything Terry Jones (the pastor who hung and burned that effigy in front of his church) says or does. I bet you won't find it outside of his own small group of sympathizers, which I am sure we can all agree are no better than human garbage. Human garbage that has every right to the stupid things that they do (just like Griffin.)

Agreed

I've heard pretty much every mainstream republican
n disavow him, and none make excuses for him either.

Negative. Show any mainstream source that says anyone supports what Cathy Griffon did.

Aside from Alec Baldwin, Jim carry and some Twitter nuts I think all are distancing themselves, but where we these voices when Madonna suggested blowing up the Whitehouse, or when mobs formed outside Trump towers chanting f trump., All equally distasteful. I have many many many problems with Republicans and some conservatives, but the Dems don't seem to want to include me and libertarians can't seem to find anyone better than Ron Paul or Gary Johnson. I would love to see more Dems step up and call the extreme factions what they are...nutjobs. At which point I may start to view them as a contender instead of a melting pot of extremes

That's why I love you man :)

Mobs or demonstrators excercising their 1st Ammendment rights?

I'm surprised Bill Maher isn't bathing in Champagne over this, and I've been waiting for Madonna to shut up and go away since the 1980s.

Dems & Repubs are ossified establishment robots oblivious to real people.

Ron Paul is beautiful. Ron Paul was the best hope we had since The Articles of Confederation.

I didn't say don't demonstrate your rights, by all means prove that you are classless mob ruled robots. We have common ground on maddona at least :)

Who is this "you"? Fella, your agenda does not register me to any party.

I believe in doing, not farting en masse then going back home and posting it on my Facebook status or crying about it on a stolen meme for astoundingly valuable upvotes.

I do agree about classless New York mobs. Look who we got in the Oval Office.

What's my agenda?

Wait, you purport to tell me mine, but don't know your own? Really?

btw, looking back at the original question (which was dodged by the rightie who claimed bs), 2 comics are hardly mainstream sources.

And Madonna was NOT widely criticized for what she said? Alt news nutters are not for real. Hence why it's called, "Alternative reality"

I'm out of this one. When I reply with a bit of humor tossed in, and agree on a couple of points and upvoted you (since removed), only to to met with an intentionally erroneous classifaction and allegation of what you claim I do and stand for (Ron Paul, DING DING DING!), then it's clear your intentions are simply to argue.

You asked to show what mainstreamers were supporting her. I pointed out 2 individuals and Twitter nuts being all I could find, pretty much proving your point. However I do feel it takes a lot more for the left to condemn one of its own which I was attempting to back up with madonna, and the NY protectors but you can go ahead and toss in blm. While I happened to like a lot of what Ron Paul had to say, due to my own past addictions and watching friends, family members and kids who grew up with mine die from drugs, legalizing them is a non-starter with me. Next item the you was anyone feeling compelled to behave that way, not YOU in particular, unless you support that behavior. (Supporting the behavior and the right to behave that way are seperate.) You suggested I have an agenda, and I was asking what you thought my agenda was. I think I've been pretty calm here and even agreed with you some. You seem touchy.

All sides need to beware of describing an entire group based on the actions of an individual? or a few members of said group. I don't watch main stream media but from what I've heard they have all pretty much condemned her actions.

Wait a minute, didn't YOU lump me with them liberals a few weeks and dismissed all I had to say because of your erroneous assumption?

I'm not on any silly biased cheerleader side. Horseshoe theory and all that.

I'm bad about making the assumption that someone is a Leftist and dismissing them when they are defending the lefts narrative. They have a narrative of "facts" and "history" that they will defend til the death. Regardless of what type of bad logic and reasoning they have to use. Sometimes you have to answer a fool according to his folly and end up looking foolish yourself. Sorry if you don't consider yourself a "cheerleader" type, try not to act like one and you might not get mislabeled.

Facts are facts, regardless of your one dimensional lemming party agenda.

Try not acting like a fool and you won't have to apologize for being one?

Hypocrisy much? Physician heal thyself?

*cues ad-hominem-coming music and prepares for being called bad things like, "troll" and "butthurt" and "liberal" and "wacyst against the establishment"*

Later toots, as per usual, you use form, but not content. Have fun with yourself.

PS: As before, after asking you to explain something you mentioned thinly, you sidestepped it and proceeded with your assumptions and passive/aggresive logical fallacies primer 101 categorizations. YAY!

If ya ain'ts got anythang ta say, don't say it?

Which contradicts the implication of your "Negative" reply to Opan_irl.

FOX and these fantasy alt news nutters rode that 8 year crucify Obama wave into higher ratings.
While my viewing of FOX was restricted mainly to Red Eye and some viewing of others (Megyn Kelly, The Five, etc) back then, I sure as heck can't recall any stories, let alone condemnation, of such heinous disgusting vile mockery of our President, Barack Hussein Obama from them.
Of course I'll be told that I simply missed their patriotic defense rallying cry, yes?

I only ask for main stream sources because I know that is what most people feed on. That's where they get there "information." Plus I know MSM has a knack for damage control. That's why all the Leftist news outlets have derided Griffin. I fully expect that no-go do the same thing or did the same thing with Terry Jones.

I asked you the same thing, and you replied with empty rhetoric and ad hominems, or rather, offered them within the scaffolding of a bogus logical argument.
Logic requires substance, fact. Not just the mere pointing out of logical fallacies.

Oh please, give the Commie RT sponsored alt BSN (BullShytNews) a rest.

Hey, I miss any good Nugent interviews on FAUX News lately?

:D

A little less graphic tho?

Still a death threat. :/

I didn't say that was ok.

I didn't say you said. But I don't remember hearing about the secret service threatening Snoop for his Lavender video. Does anyone know? I can't find anything about it...

Historical connotions lost on ya?

When Barrack HUSSEIN Obama was born, sorry, planted here by young Commie KGB Vladimir Putin, it was NOT illegal to lynch Negros in the USA in the manner depicted in that effigy.
That image unfortunately stings waaaaaay too many people, as was intended.
Not all racists are that stoopit.

Not saying that asswipe Griffon did any better, but you can't tell me that Halloween head had the same effect on you.

Oh no, wait, you will.

Did anyone with a platform like hers depict such vulgarity?
Shes victim of oppression!