Imgflip Logo Icon
680 views 35 upvotes Made by VagabondModeAmouth 1 month ago in politics
Make your own GIF
42 Comments
12 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Charlie Kirk | why don't pro-abortion activists ever mention the fact that in 9 states, you can kill a baby up to the moment of birth yet, they still deman | image tagged in charlie kirk | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Why is it only progressive single women with no kids yelling and screaming about wanting to kill babies?
10 ups, 1mo
9 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Just a matter of time before pro choice will include the right to murder children after they are born because of the burden they are on parents.
2 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
LOL you pro choice people always refer to extreme rare conditions to justify why most abortions occur. It’s not to protect the life of the mother but, rather, to protect her lifestyle.
2 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Not only inducing labor but also delivering c section. Abortion is rarely ever the only option to preserve the mother’s life. In that case it’s not really an abortion but a true medical procedure. The vast majority of abortions are elective and the pro choice crowd tries to lump them in with medical procedures calling it “women’s health”
0 ups, 4w,
1 reply
It's not a matter of saving the baby when a doctor is recommending a procedure that can ultimately end in the fetal development or survival once removed. The physician or obgyn is using their medical knowledge and medical doctrine to perform specialized procedures. Their is no guarantee to life in a pregnancy. We have no medical guarantees in our own human life when it comes to trusting doctors treatments and pharmicutical recommendations. What one medical device or prescription information packet informed a physician to prescribe and use is fine till it harms a patient without any information to the physicians. Same concept towards these laws the hender a medical physician from making a educated recommendation. If they are bound by the law to make medical recommendations in such a way that was not medically relevant for a individuals situation then we have a huge problem with our government playing Doctor Barbie. It needs to stop it's not a political issue, let doctors preform medicine in a ethically doctorial way, and leave the political, religious, but what's, and what about the unknown fetus future to fate. Someone's pregnancy should not be the center of a political religious plot restrict doctors working in a very life sensitive field. Facts if life not everything can survive and sometimes individuals need medical intervention by whatever is deemed medically necessary by a physician.
0 ups, 4w,
2 replies
You’re still trying to justify elective abortions by saying doctors shouldn’t be constrained by laws. The fact is there are many laws, in addition to abortion restrictions, that govern what doctors can and cannot do - such as prescribing strong pain drugs, sending patients to labs they own, and malpractice laws that set rules for medical mistakes and standards of care.

So, no, doctors cannot and should not be left to their medical knowledge and doctrine. Just because a doctor feels something is medically necessary doesn’t mean it is.
0 ups, 4w,
1 reply
It's a good point. They also have a bunch of laws that protect the doctors and highly protect the pharmicutical companies. And even contradict the medical industry. So it's just a huge mess. But there to a delay in medical care or diagnosis in a pregnancy can be malpractice if it harms the patient or ends in wrongful death. And the states with heartbeat laws have killed off innocent women wrongfully... Do you remember the state that kept a woman on life support all because of the wrong interpretation of the heart beat law... Didn't allow the woman to die because a fetus inside her still had a heartbeat. Pretty messed up thing to do above family directive.
0 ups, 4w,
1 reply
It was Georgia and, as you said, due to misinterpretation of the law. But that’s an isolated case and doesn’t justify nixing the law.
0 ups, 4w
So what do the families and individuals do? Sue the doctor who killed both the mother and fetus in a heartbeat state? Or sue for killing the mother and saving the fetus, or killing the fetus but sparring the mothers life? 15 % of all er visits end in pregnant women requiring emergency care. Due to preeclampsia, hemorrhage, placenta detachment, and so many other factors that effect individual pregnant women. I hope the politics can stay out of the woman's doctors appoinents and ER visits, or Delivery room.
0 ups, 4w
But in the case of that law it's called learned intermediary doctrine it shifts all liability off of both doctors and pharmicutical companies in major cases where individuals are harmed by prescription or medical devices. The theory is that the pharmicutical companies have provided enough warnings and clear details on how medical devices work and how prescription react. But because humans are humans and different things go wrong. Let's take a new pill sized health monitor they are always trying to push into elderly to help with diagnostic work for strokes and heart problems. They fail to inform the patient that the device is permanent. Then when these devices move or embed into the wall of the heart, the information from the device company is left to the doctor to decide what to do next. So when you go to sue med tronic for failure to warn, the law protects both doctors and the device manufacturers. And for some weird reason medical devices are classified as prescriptions. Yet some physicians fail to educate patients on the prescription or devices they recommend. I think it boils down to a very greedy American healthcare system. Sure it's hard to trust a doctor but if my pregnant wife was going to die I would want them to do everything they could to save her first, and secondly try to save the pregnancy.
7 ups, 1mo
7 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
imgflip.com/i/9vpixf

The Abortion Act of 1967 in Great Britain has more restrictions, yet it is a passed legislation Bill

David Steel set precedence that Libweirdos in the USA have yet to figure out how to copy the fete.
7 ups, 1mo
Keep donating to Pro-Choice candidates that write ZERO Legislative Bills to demonstrate they've earned your donation to their campaigns for over half a century
8 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
The Department of Health and Human Services released a report suggesting a lot of doctors and hospitals forgot they ever took the “First, do no harm” oath.

Department of Health and Human Services released “Wolves in White Coats: How Doctors and Hospitals Pushed and Profited from the Fraud of ‘Gender Medicine'".
8 ups, 1mo
https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-report-insurance-coding-sex-rejecting-procedures-minors.html
6 ups, 1mo
5 ups, 1mo
Demonrats have to sacrifice
3 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Stop arguing with the trolls, they don't even know what a woman is and are dumb enough to believe that men can get pregnant. They seem to have a lack of understand on what makes someone a woman but can easily tell men, weird
0 ups, 1mo
Whenever I ask a maga what they think a woman is, they get the answer wrong
1 up, 1mo
Maternal mortality rates went up in states where abortion was outlawed. What a shock.
[deleted]
3 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
1 up, 1mo
Ok. If you all are so adamant about people having babies, maybe we should make having them cheaper, maybe by making a public healthcare option or something? Also, a fertilized egg is both sperm and egg, so by definition, that makes sperm and egg part of a baby.
6 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Reality, not a place you would know. It s all over the news nationally.
1 up, 1mo
7 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
Imagine what kind of twisted fcking demon you'd have to be to laugh and celebrate a full grown baby being murdered - every person in his picture is possessed by satan.
3 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
The demonrat trolls know abortion is murder and nothing can justify it. That's why they say stupid things like what about the mom? First mom is the murderer along with the doctor, but they don't care. The other huge lie is medical necessity. 65 million abortions, are we supposed to believe all were medical emergencies, of course not. They stopped with claiming everyone was a product of rape a few years ago, it was an old standby.

All they have is lies, well here is the truth, their own parents aborted the wrong one. The hate between them and their parents is a normal demonrat pattern, both blame the other for everything the other does. It also explains why they hate traditional families; they do not understand love because they have never felt it. It is doubtful they ever will.
0 ups, 1mo
Keep pretending everyone agrees with you 😂

You think asking about a woman's health and safety is stupid?

Nobody says every single abortion was a medical necessity. Try again 😂

And nobody said everybody is a product of rape. Try again 😂

So you think abortion is wrong but you want people to have been aborted. There's that maga hypocrisy. No morals, no standards, no consistency.

Nobody hates "traditional families". We just understand that other kinds of families are fine too

Teach us about family values 😂 would that be the family values where trump abuses his daughters? Or the family values where he cheats on every wife he's ever had? Or the family values where he beats up his wife?
4 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
In the U.S., there isn’t a precise national “average” count for abortions done to save the mother’s life, because those cases usually aren’t tracked as a separate category. But they appear to be rare—far less than 1% of all abortions. The U.S. reports about 1.1 million abortions in 2024, and only a small share of later abortions are due to serious medical danger.
KFF
2

A related hard number: CDC recorded 5 abortion-related deaths in 2021, with a case-fatality rate of 0.46 deaths per 100,000 legal abortions. That’s not the same as “life-saving abortions,” but it shows how uncommon fatal outcomes are.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
1 up, 1mo
But it still happens.

At 1 per 200,000.

Is it pro-life to condemn those women?
0 ups, 4w
I love how half the rare diseases women live with today who take medication have black box warnings about pregnancy, or have a mandatory birth control use recommendation....that's coming from cancer treatment waiting room magazines.... Don't even dare to go into a mental health clinic and look at the parent magazines, then look at the mental health medication.... Then see the pregnant woman sitting in the waiting room for a appointment in the mental health clinc. People want to be all for restricting doctors from preforming and recommending abortions, I say the government should be restricting these GD pharmicutical companies who are ill informing prescribing physicians the real life long unknown implications of taking mental health medication while pregnant, or any prescription that can affect the pregnancy.... How about that being priority. Maybe pregnancy would be safer and more successful.
7 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Blah, blah, blah. Allows murder of a viable fetus up until birth without restriction or requirement for threat to health. Only Ghouls and idiots support such trash.
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
I think it was pretty clear that there were exceptions, but I understand your dishonesty allows you to ignore facts.
0 ups, 4w
There were exceptions but not after the time had been exceeded. Y'all like to pretend that horrible things don't happen, but they do. And you have to make space for hard decisions like does the mother live or die.
Make your own GIF
NSFW
Created from video with the Imgflip Animated GIF Maker
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
"I am the Devil, and I am here to do the Devil's work."