Charlie was truly one of a kind

Charlie Kirk
Cause of Death: trying to reason with Leftists.

Average leftists beefin with a dead conservative

Real

that is hate speech, disagreeing with the machine is a crime punishable by death.

I disagreed with him. But he shouldn't have died.

Respect.

Just saying. Free speech is what America is all about. Even when your intial ideas are ridiculous, you're supposed to debate them out so that you end up with good ideas. That's what democracy is for.

Honestly. Tyler Robinson should just have debated Charlie and made his own movement instead of killing him.

Thanks for your wise words. But if I remember correctly, we are a constitutional republic, not a democracy. Out of curiosity, would you please explain why so many Democrats and liberals are concerned for it? Just curious.

I'm not a democrat or a liberal. As I got more political. I just became a mix of both sides.

I really don't know why the left is so concerned for democracy.

But my guess is that leftists want everyone to be included in society. Not that inclusion is a bad thing, but sometimes you've got to question why we're supposed to suddenly let in a lot of people.

When someone does do that, like ask "what is a woman?" the left gets all sensitive and calls people "nazis" or "fascists" etc.

It can be both at the same time

Quote something "Hateful" that Charlie Kirk said.

Sure. And keep in mind that what's hateful is subjective, so not agreeing it's hateful doesn't matter

"Kirk blamed the so-called "decline of American men” on trans equality in an interview with failed college swimmer Riley Gaines, saying people should have “just took care of” trans people “the way we used to take care of things in the 1950s and 60s" — which independent journalist Erin Reed notes included lobotomies, shock therapy, and involuntary institutionalization. Others interpreted it as advocating for lynchings or physical violence against trans people."

When Charlie Kirk references the 1950s and 60s, he isn't advocating for lobotomies or violence. He is talking about a time when traditional nuclear families, clear biological definitions, and conventional ideas of masculinity were the cultural standard. His focus is on returning to those cultural values, not reviving historical medical practices.

The key point being “independent journalist Erin Reed notes …” In other words, she injected her biased belief of what she wanted people to conclude, not what he actually said or meant.