Imgflip Logo Icon

politics

politics | NOOOOOOOOO! NOOOOOOOOO! | image tagged in political meme | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
474 views • 35 upvotes • Made by MoozaHooza 2 months ago in politics
political meme
50 Comments
HarveyHolmes
13 ups, 2mo,
2 replies
You are posting in the wrong sub.

This place is for Trump haters. Injecting reality into a meme can be deemed hostile. :)
MoozaHooza
9 ups, 2mo
Hahaha! That is so true... but that also make it fun when you see terminal, end-stage, incurable Trump Derangement Syndrome reaches heights deemed impossible...and they will exceed the impossible every single time.
lokiare
4 ups, 2mo,
1 reply
Jokes on you because all of them have been investigated and proven false, including two made up by law firms to smear him.
Modda
1 up, 1mo
um, no.
CharlesHobby1
11 ups, 2mo,
1 reply
Upvoted. I notice that when facts-based reality get introduced to Imgflip leftists they flip into either meltdown mode or drop that subject like a hot potato.
Graeystone
11 ups, 2mo,
2 replies
Don't worry, they still have their 'Trump is a rapist even though the accuser used a script of a Law and Order: SVU episode to make the claim.'
MoozaHooza
7 ups, 2mo
Yeah! Found guilty by the same judge who just dropped the charges against that pervert Prince Andrew for having sex with grossly underaged girls: Judge Kaplan. Prince Andrew's acts were so gross that the British have stripped him of his "princehood", royal titles, and kicked him out of the royal residences. But oh NO! Not by the liberal American judge Kaplan.. his Mohammedian pedophile acts were fine: nothing to see there. Tell me that Judge Kaplan was not raking in black money for his judgements!
CharlesHobby1
4 ups, 2mo
Yes, and I noticed that the fanatically leftist loyal media outlets pretended that it was never raised as an issue.
Yoinertur
2 ups, 2mo,
1 reply
Owo? Wuts dis?
lokiare
5 ups, 2mo,
2 replies
You'll need to provide sources. This looks like that discredited case that got shut down when it was proven there was no call.
Modda
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
Why would you need a source if you already know that that one is discredited - according to you?
lokiare
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
Because I want to know if its the discredited case or something new.
Modda
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
What discredited case?
lokiare
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
There's two cases sheer the prosecution couldn't provide a victim. One where the woman came out later and said she was lying.
Modda
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
No, there isn't any such case, let alone one who claimed to have been lying.

How could prosecution not provide a victim only for a victim to come out and claim she was lying afterwards? If they couldn't provide one, they couldn't provide one to say that she was lying.
lokiare
1 up, 1mo,
2 replies
Jane Doe v. Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein (2016 Lawsuit)
Allegations: An anonymous plaintiff (referred to as Jane Doe, later associated with the pseudonym Katie Johnson) accused Trump and Epstein of raping her in 1994 at Epstein's Manhattan residence when she was 13 years old.
Resolution/Investigation: The California suit was dismissed in May 2016 for failing to raise valid federal claims. The New York suit was voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff on November 4, 2016, without prejudice, citing threats and fear for her safety.

Unverified Sexual Assault Allegations Compiled by the FBI (Referenced in 2025 FBI Memos)
Allegations: The files include a compilation of over a dozen anonymous or secondhand tips received by the FBI, many via its National Threat Operations Center around 2019-2021.
Resolution/Investigation: The FBI documented but did not substantiate these claims, noting their unverified nature. The DOJ explicitly stated in the file release that these allegations are "unfounded and false," with no credible evidence to pursue. No charges or further investigations resulted.

Allegations from Epstein Victim Interviews (FBI Notes from 2021)
Allegations: One Epstein victim told FBI investigators that Ghislaine Maxwell "presented" her to Trump at a New York party and later suggested to Trump that she was "available," implying potential availability for sexual encounters. The victim emphasized that "nothing happened" between her and Trump.
Resolution/Investigation: The FBI recorded the statement but found no evidence of wrongdoing by Trump. No further action was taken, as the victim confirmed no assault occurred. This reference in the files does not constitute a formal allegation against Trump and was not pursued.

FBI Tip Line Allegations During Epstein's 2019 Arrest

Allegations: The files include tips from an FBI 800-number hotline established after Epstein's 2019 arrest, with a few mentioning Trump. One example claimed a 13-year-old girl performed oral sex on Trump, bit him, and was slapped in response. These were part of hundreds of tips, many anonymous or speculative.
Resolution/Investigation: The tips were inadvertently included in the file release but received no follow-up, as they lacked credibility or verifiable details. The DOJ reiterated there is no credible evidence linking Trump to Epstein's crimes, and he appears on an FBI list of "people suspected of possible wrongdoing" solely due to such unsubstantiated tips, with no basis for ch
Modda
1 up, 1mo
Goodness gracious, Jane Doe was a decade ago, 2016 to be precise.
dmcc78
0 ups, 1mo
These rich sex offenders are lucky to have you defending them nonstop.
Yoinertur
2 ups, 2mo,
1 reply
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00020517.pdf
lokiare
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
Looks like these allegations were not considered credible because they were third hand and filed right before the 2020 election. The FBI decided not to pursue it further.
Yoinertur
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
How would that disprove them
lokiare
1 up, 1mo
In court with evidence. Like they did.
MoozaHooza
4 ups, 2mo,
2 replies
Ummm! This was before 2006. Walking into a room and finding Epstein with teenage girls hanging around... and feeling uncomfortable and getting the hell out of there... does not mean that a crime is being, or, has been committed (by Epstein). Being uncomfortable of another actions does not mean that a crime is being committed... nor can one know, or prove that a crime is being committed. Also, Epstein was a very powerful democrat figure with powerful friends. What was Trump supposed to do? Go to the police and say... "Epstein is hanging around teenaged girls"? Everyone who was anyone in New York knew that Epstein hung around with teenaged girls!
As for that 30,000 times that is just contextual... done by The New York Times using a proprietary tool to scan for references to Trump, his wife Melania, his Mar-a-Lago club, and related phrases, identified over 38,000 references across more than 5,300 files (combining the January 2026 release with prior tranches). Their his higher figure captures indirect or contextual references, not just his exact name.
These counts are approximate and include a mix of content: benign items like news articles Epstein collected, unverified public tips submitted to the FBI (many described as false or sensationalist, especially those from around the 2020 election),
In summary, a rough estimate lands in the low thousands for direct name mentions, scaling up to tens of thousands when including broader references. No official DOJ count exists, and does not imply wrongdoing by Trump—it's often archival or unsubstantiated.
- A search for the exact phrase "Donald Trump" on the DOJ's Epstein website returned over 1,800 results, as files continued to be indexed. But again, no wrongdoing indicated. One must remember that Epstein hated Trump... and was obsessed by him... following his life and stalking him! So yeah! He would be more mentioned in his files!
- For Bill Clinton, mentions are in the low thousands in many analyses. One detailed count from recent files puts his name at around 1,193 times
- These are rough estimates—no official per-name tally from the DOJ exists, and counts vary by exact search (e.g., "Bill Clinton" vs. "Clinton" vs. contextual). Much material is archival, unsubstantiated tips, or benign (news clippings Epstein collected). No new criminal implications for any of these figures emerged from the releases.
Via_Getty
3 ups, 1mo
Exactly. You can be creeped out by someone, even have suspicions that they're doing something, but "suspicions" are not the same thing as "knowledge."
MoozaHooza
4 ups, 2mo
Also, where there is smoke... may just mean that below a lot of bullshit is smoking up someone A@#! No fire needed!
Regarding Donald Trump:
No direct accusations from teenage victims in Epstein files: Major victims like Virginia Giuffre (recruited at 16-17 from Mar-a-Lago) explicitly stated in depositions and interviews that she met Trump but never witnessed him engaging in any wrongdoing, nor was she trafficked to him. She described no sexual involvement or misconduct by Trump.
One accuser (pseudonym "Jane") testified in Maxwell's 2021 trial that Epstein introduced her to Trump at Mar-a-Lago when she was 14 (in the 1990s). She confirmed no inappropriate behavior or abuse by Trump occurred during or related to that meeting.
A 2016 lawsuit (filed under pseudonyms "Katie Johnson" / "Jane Doe") alleged Trump raped a 13-year-old girl at Epstein-linked parties in 1994. It included an affidavit from a supposed recruiter ("Tiffany Doe"). The case was filed multiple times (California and New York), but dismissed or voluntarily withdrawn each time—often abruptly, with reports of threats or credibility issues. It resurfaced in some 2025-2026 file references (e.g., House Oversight docs), but remains unproven, unadjudicated, and widely regarded as discredited or unsubstantiated by major outlets and fact-checks. No teenage victim testified under oath in court to support it, and the plaintiff has not been heard from publicly since.
Other mentions of Trump in files (e.g., flight logs for ~8 domestic flights in the 1990s, social introductions) include no victim testimonies alleging abuse.
MoozaHooza
4 ups, 2mo,
2 replies
Yes! Trump was listed on at least eight flights between 1993 and 1996. Key details include:
- At least four of those flights also had Ghislaine Maxwell on board.
- One 1993 flight listed only Trump and Epstein as passengers.
- Another had Trump, Epstein, and a then-20-year-old woman (name redacted in documents).
- Many flights included family members, like one in 1995 with Trump's son Eric (from Palm Beach to Teterboro, NJ).
- These were mostly short domestic trips (e.g., Palm Beach, FL to New Jersey/New York area), during a period when Trump and Epstein were social acquaintances in New York/Palm Beach circles.

- Now, compare those with Bill Clinton's 26 flights!
- This does not mean that any crime was committed either by Trump or Clinton during these flights.
- Epstein modus operandi was to get to know powerful people for his own benefit... for influence.
lokiare
4 ups, 2mo
People don't realize that the rich rent out their jets to each other when needed.
MoozaHooza
4 ups, 2mo
Incurable TDS. Name one of those articles?
dmcc78
2 ups, 2mo,
2 replies
Essentially like the villain of a movie backstabbing his partner in crime, then telling the cops how bad that partner is. Of course we can't prove that.
MoozaHooza
4 ups, 2mo,
1 reply
Incurable TDS... what crime? Give an example.
MoozaHooza
4 ups, 2mo,
2 replies
Severe TDS. He did not know a crime was being committed. He did know that Epstein was a creep who liked hanging around young girls... which is NOT a crime!
dmcc78
1 up, 2mo,
2 replies
He supposedly called Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter and said, "Thank goodness you're stopping him, everyone has known he's been doing this." Either that didn't happen or did. Do you still think he didn't know?
MoozaHooza
4 ups, 2mo,
1 reply
Additional context from Reiter's account:
- Trump said he had banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago.
- He claimed people in New York knew Epstein was "disgusting."
- He described Ghislaine Maxwell as "evil" and urged focus on her.
- Trump mentioned once being around Epstein with teenagers present and leaving quickly ("got the hell out of there").
Again... you cannot know that a crime is being committed unless you see it with your own eyes (in this case). Trump suspected... but could do nothing about it... and wanted nothing to do with it... if a crime was being committed!
Anyway, I have wasted enough time on this... you can make your last statement. The force is strong with you in your hatred for Trump! And your Trump Derangement is stronger than the force.
Me, I have a lot of stuff to do with my life and this is the last time I am ever responding to you. You seem to have zero things to do in your life! Good luck!
lokiare
4 ups, 2mo,
1 reply
No, that means everyone talked about it. Not that everyone had video footage or something.
dmcc78
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
That's some impressive spin, I'll give you that.
lokiare
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
So here's where idealism meets reality. Ideally everyone that knew or heard rumors would go to the police and Jeffrey would be immediately arrested and tried. Back in reality Jeffrey was part of the CIA that could simply tell the cops "no". Jeffrey was known to have people killed or ruined. He was wealthy. Anyone that tried to tarnish his reputation would be taken to court by an army of lawyers. It just wasn't viable until there was actual proof.
dmcc78
0 ups, 1mo
In the big picture, most Americans want whoever was involved with that sex trafficking of minors to face consequences, no matter what political party they're with. But there may never be enough proof.
Via_Getty
2 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Suspicion isn't the same as knowledge.

And let's look at the way Trump typically speaks. He tends to use hyperbole. Everybody's saying it. The best hyperbole. Believe me.

So for him to say "everyone has known he's doing this" falls more in line with the way Trump talks and not "I am part of a massive elite human trafficking ring."
dmcc78
1 up, 1mo
He didn't say "everyone has suspected." If this phone call happened.
whistlelock
1 up, 2mo,
1 reply
So... he randomly calls a chief of police to say "thank goodness you're stopping him." and "he's evil and Ghislane is his operative." and "everyone has know he's been doing this" ? Yet doesn't know that anything criminal is happening?

That makes sense to you? When you say it out loud, that seems rational to you?
lokiare
4 ups, 2mo,
1 reply
You realize there's proof Epstein had people killed right? No one wants to die, (everyone knew) but Trump was the first to turn on him to the police.
whistlelock
1 up, 1mo
Let's review.

Epstein was arrested for being a pedo.
Trump called to talk to the Chief of Police to say that Epstein was notorious for... something...and it's a good thing they're stopping Epstein.

And you think that something is wholly unrelated to being a pedo?

Hey, whatever lies you need to tell yourself so you can keep supporting Dear Leader.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 2
  • dragon.jpg
  • teen.jpg
  • screaming woman.jpg
    • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    NOOOOOOOOO! NOOOOOOOOO!