Oh, the irony...

Yes we can

Finally! A leftist who can define all 10^238+ genders. You don't have to define them all but perhaps just the basic two. Define them. And if you say "whatever you want them to be", I have a particular set of skills and I will find you and I will slap you upside the head. 😁 Just kidding, I have no skills, none whatsoever.

But I give you the floor. Define away.

https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender#tab=tab_1

Put simply, man and woman (gender) refer to the nonphysical things like expression and social roles of male and female (sex)

That's the same left caca you guys have been saying for years. There were even studies that were done to try to see if little boys would play with dolls and little girls would place with toy trucks. And they kept them secluded from all societal influence.

It was a big disappoint for the leftists who initiated these studies. While there was some crossover the majority of boys wanted to play with toy trucks and the majority of girls wanted to play with dolls.

Because it is more than just a social construct, it is part of who we are. Gender is more than just XY and XX chromosomes. It is built into the fabric of who we are as a people.

It is NOT oppressive because the basic nature of men is to provide and the basic nature of women is to take care of children. That does not mean that all men want to provide and all women want babies. It just means as an average across all cultures this is what is common.

Income inequality is not relevant anymore, except in the federal government. And the reason it exists in the federal government is because the left needs to have this as a talking point. They need it to exist but they can't control (as much as they would love to) private businesses yet. Income inequality in private businesses does exist but it is only around one or two cents lower than men.

But here is something that is always left out. Women menstruate. This causes some women severe pain on a monthly bases. That causes them to take more time off then men. This is not all women. Some women have no problems at all during this time. But enough women do. Businesses typically cannot operate and stay competitive when a portion of their workforce is constantly taking time off. And that effects pay.

But the left who believes equality of outcome is a virtue demands that men and women are identical in every way. We are just just worker drones who all produce at the same rate. That's what Marx thought. So the left believes that everyone should earn the exact same pay regardless of the value of the work they are performing, their skill level, their motivation, their education and their intellect.

Mankind is nothing like that and never will be no matter how much force you put on mankind. We all work at different levels. That why there are women, even women with severe menstrual cycles who will earn more money than some men. Why, because of the value of their labor.

Labor is not equal. The labor theory of value is socialist nonsense.

Not sure what your point is about those studies. Most people are cisgender so it makes sense that most kids would play with toys that correspond to how society views their gender

Chromosomes are part of what determines someone's sex, it's not everything. And gender is different. Some men have XX chromosomes and some women have XY.

You think that's the roles of men and women because that's what your society says. Not every culture does things the same way.

And your rant about gender and wages was completely irrelevant.

That's not how chromosomes work. You would know that if you passed seventh grade science class.

"You think that's the roles of men and women because that's what your society says"

You totally missed the point of those studies. They wanted to see if kids removed from all outside influence would all act identical to each other, both male and female. They did not. Boys still acted like boys and girls still acted like girls.

Society does not dictate behavior. It can influence behavior but it only amplifies the already existing behavior.

You're the one who brought up gender inequality. If gender inequality is bad then genders should then act and behave identical. That's why the left allowed men to complete in women's sports.

Genders are NOT the same and will always be unequal and that is not a bad thing. Men, on average, will always be 40% stronger than women. Although the recent move to feminize men is changing that. The new generation of men are physically weaker than the previous generations.

The inequality between men and women is what makes their parental roles so important. It's want makes a healthy society.

I am not advocating treating women as inferior or anything like that. The roles are different not inferior. There are things that women can do that is far superior than men and the opposite is also true.

The socialist left hates that and demands that both genders act and behave identical to everyone else. You can see it in how much the left has negativity influenced culture.

And now, pretty much out of the blue, the left began inventing new genders. Other than devaluing the existing 2 genders, what purpose do those genders serve? You used the prefix "cis".

Where did that come from? Why did the left assign that to the existing two genders? Was it just another attempt to control the language?

in my opinion

That is not an opinion. That is a fact. 2 genders; no more, no less.

You thas not just a fact it's common sence

Right, mb.

auso sorry for my bad english

*ahem* two SEXES.

Wrong. Sex and gender are the same thing.

then why are there two words for it?

Tissue vs Kleenex
Pancake vs Flapjack
Band aid vs Bandage
American Indian vs Native American
Happy vs joyful
Fast vs quick
People like to have multiple different ways to say the same thing. Also, not sure, but weren't both words in circulation before the transgender movement was a thing.

Who whod win
Fictional genders
Or a bathroom sign

Bathroom sign. Also, to expand on MeLikeStories' point,
Doobie vs. Mary Jane
Book vs. Novel
Mexican vs. Latin American
Chive vs. Green Onion
Gun vs. Firearm
Fire vs. Flame
Soda vs. Pop
Toilet Paper vs. Toilet Tissue
Having two different words meaning the same thing is called a synonym, which we all learned about around first grade; but apparently some people are stuck in preschool reading levels.

looks like my little joke was trown in the whong place

Not all books are novels
Green onions are bigger than chives
Soda is used in some parts of the world while pop is used in others. Same for toilet paper and toilet tissue

That's right, go cry to the mods that I called you an idiot.

When did I ever say that?

Then who flagged me for saying "idiot," when you lefties are constantly calling us pedos?

Some wimp who can't take a mild insult.

Band aid is a brand name that people use in lieu of bandages. Same thing for tissue vs kleenex

True, but if we're going to talk about word origins, gender comes from the root word gen which means to produce or create. This could mean that gender was originally used as an alternative to the word sex as Ridleyyyyyyyyyy has previously proposed. Let's be honest though almost everyone is arguing over the word because of the implications of their meanings and not a lot of people would care what they actually mean otherwise.

One is for people uncomfortable with saying the word "sex," and the other is for doctors asking if you have a dick and testicles or a pussy.

Not what happens

Pretty sure it f**king is.

They are different things

No. They are synonyms.

omly

Don't get stuck on numbers, the 74 will grow as more and more leftists figure out that they do not fit in even with the societal reject crowds and invent yet another "gender." They could save time by just standing on a street corner and screaming "look at me, look at me." I know we walk by them and pretend we do not see them but that only depresses them more.

And auso scientist thint confirm the existence of aliens

Wrong

why is that wrong?

The thing that's whong are the fact that the other 72 genders don't exist

Okay, so I've been waiting ever since my 8 hour comment ban to cover this.

Sex is what you have in you pants, gender is how you identify and how society perceives you.

Why should what's in your pants have anything to do with your role in society?

You know what, why should gender identity have anything to do with your role in society either?

Okay back to the original subject: Gender identity is different than sex, it's that simple.

Then why are people using their "gender identity" to get into spaces that are separate because of the inherent differences in physicality between the sexes, most notably sports

They are going into places that align with their gender identity to be around other people of that same gender

Oh, the irony... In a reply to a comment of mine yesterday you were condescending that I used "it" improperly when referencing America, instead of "her".

Returning the favor - please explain "You think they're 74 plus genders" and "tween"