There will be members that oppose this

Best case scenario:
She gives a pre-written speech (written by someone else) on the issues of child trafficking like she's doing a special on PBS that has absolutely nothing to do with her, the children, the customers or the situation.
Media says she did ok by bringing up the issue but acknowledge nothing of particular value was said, then the whole epstein story is unanimously stricken from the national media records and the next big story coincidentally shows up to redirect everyones attention until its all forgotten about

Best. case. Scenario.
Not even going to consider the story any further because this is now the 900th rodeo I've attended and I don't need to see the result to know what its going to be

She probably knows the identity of 90% of her and her boss' top-level powerful and influential clients; but it would be her word against theirs; and so legally that probably won't fly. But my gut tells me that if she actually had her hands on any proof NOT already held and either secretly used or destroyed by the Biden administration then she would have 'committed' Arkancide years ago . . . just like Epstein did.

That's why we got things like flight logs, whatever evidence was found at the island, and key eye witness testimony. And even if the Epstein List(not to be confused with actual evidence) does exist then releasing it now will only screw up things later concerning legal procedure - defense lawyers will get it removed from the trial, potential jurors will be tainted with preexisting knowledge of the case, and so on.

It's a mess, for sure; but sitting on the information for four years and then the next administration saying that there was never any list, is not helping combat the conspiracy theorists.

Save bet they're working on getting evidence to prove the Biden regime destroyed evidence.

That would be helpful.

Kash Patel Just opened up an investigation into the whole Democratic Party For The Past 10 years...

Good. But now let's see if anything meaningful comes of it.

Yeah. Libs are excusing Biden, saying the courts prevented him from releasing anything. Funny thing, we haven't seen any courts now screaming for its release... lol

Aye, and if any court prevented him from releasing the list it did so in total secrecy . . . which is of itself against the law.

No one is saying that honestly let’s let the list out then we can impeach the President and kick out the slimeballs in congress boom done

Pardoning her would look bad (as in admission) for Trump, and another 'suicide' would be hard to sell even to MAGAs. Okay, maybe not to them, but still...

It will be quicker to point out which two members of congress were not clients.

Republicans just voted against releasing the Epstein files last night, so...

That is not true. It was a procedural vote. They voted against Democrats having House floor control.

Bring it to the House floor for a vote, not give Democrats control of the House 🤦

dishonest dems... dishonest MSM...🤦

I saw a video recently that suggested that since Maxwell is currently incarcerated on the "evidence", that it "can't" be released prior to her day in court.

lets be honest why are politicizing this why not admit that influential people on any side are on this

lets be honest, libs never said anything about this the 4 years Biden had the evidence and did nothing.

exactly what I said bro, both sides, I highly doubt biden or his adminstration was on it

but the clintons for sure are on it atleast one of them

You realize she can just easily expose the President who’s on the list