Do you even recognize the glaring contradiction in what you posted? She was charged in STATE court, it wasn't a federal prosecution. Get your persecution complex even SLIGHTLY on point.
1. Nothing about that statement is true - most?
2. Redacted pages are not searchable in that PDF. Use an ORC tool to convert it to full text. The phrase is on page 8, if you're at least willing to read that many pages.
3. Prove "corruption" and its bearing here. If you're claiming Special Counsels aren't legal, you've got no idea what you're talking about, and only relying on extremist right-wing hopes. Search Supreme Court precedent when it comes to Special Counsels.
