Sabo tabby cat

Where?

Nice try. But slavery was abolished by capitalist societies.

No. Slavery fueled capitalism.

Maximizing production, remember? Minimizing labor costs, remember? Increasing profit, remember?

Slavery put Britain on the map, greased its Industrial Revolution.
It turned London from a swampy backwater into the financial capital of the world thanks to the banking and insurance companies that sprouted up there and grew into giant money making machines. Literally. The slave trade is directly responsible for all the banks and insurance companies located in London to this day.

In the US, the South is still relatively poor without it. During slavery, it provided the cotton, tobacco, and other crops that the manufacturing North turned into products to be traded overseas. Why do you think that even after the North got rid of its own slavery it didn't protest about it continuing in the South? The North was economically dependent on it also, albeit indirectly.

Not actually true. According to the books of Mount Vernon slavery was actually costing the economy. It also hindered innovation as slave holders could simply tell a slave to do tasks they mate as of finding new and better ways to do them.

After he switched from growing tobacco to grain? I wonder if that has anything to do with tobacco being called a cash crop?
So then he got rid of his slaves, right? Jefferson and the rest of the boys as well, huh?

George Washington finding slavery inefficient on his own personal plantation is not costing the economy. I mean, it did cost the economy especially later, after all that was the cause of the Civil War, the REAL cause. Should the federal government waste more funding on the agricultural slave owning South or on the manufacturing North that paid most of said funding to begin with? Add more slave States, and it's a further drain. Plus that with added members to Congress, they get to vote themselves more money.

The cotton gin and other such innovation reduced labor needs, making farming cheaper, thus making slavery an increasingly costly expenditure rather than an investment.

But it isn't like slave owners were going bankrupt with the practice but failed to realize it over the centuries. Profits were still made from agriculture to manufacture to sales to exports. And banking and insurance as well. Britain may have outlawed slave ownership in 1807, but it still reaped huge profits off the slave trade.

The cotton gin, along with other innovations like the McCormick Reaper, the spinning Jenny, and then Ford’s tractors, were the result of capitalism. Thanks for proving my point that capitalism ended slavery.

Doesn't even make sense. Ford tractors ended slavery. Sure, ok. Were these mule pulled tractors?

Capitalism did not end slavery, an effort directly aimed at breaking the Southern economy in order to bust any future attempts at seceding while making them economically dependent on the North ended it.

The US government did the same thing with Puerto Rico after taking over 1898. Not ending slavery, but by getting rid of most of the sugarcane industry, its economic driver - confiscating farmland and giving those over to US owners, closing down the big refineries, relocating sugarcane laborers away farming areas.

In Puerto Rico, they just plant and wait for it to do its own thing before harvest.
Instead the US government heavily subsidizes sugarcane growing in Florida which requires massive amounts of water and fertilizer in order to speed up the growth process in that semi-tropical region so it can get harvested in 2 years, as opposed to 1 year in Puerto Rico as with other places in the tropics. The logic defies...

I said these were the results of capitalism. I never said they ended slavery. Tell me, Omniscient one, how the states of Massachusetts, Nee York, New Jersey, etc set their slaves free? They did it by industrializing and creating new ways to perform tasks that would have been left to slaves. Among these were Cyrus McCormick’s reaper was meant to increase crop yields while making the use of slaves to harvest them less practical. Innovations like Ford’s tractor came later. They came; however, because people individually had the freedom to innovate and the ability to acquire capital to make it happen — thus they were the result of capitalism.