Sabo tabby cat

Cat-italism

Yeeeah...but capitalists are free to complain.

Everyone who lives under socialism always flee to capitalist nations

Yet I lived under capitalism and don't like it. So what does that make me?

A complainer

What if they are complainers

Also I'm still an anarchist

If you’re an anarchist (to wit, no governmental authority or control whatsoever and letting people do as they please) who is going to force the property owners to give up private property or business owners to give up the means of production to the workers?

It might interest you to know that Marx didn’t care about workers and saw them only as a means to an end: that end being to set himself up as the world ruler.

Ungrateful

What if they are ungrateful

Also I'm an anarchist

Lucky you can exercise your views freely in a capitalist system......try that shit in a socialist regime

Remember: politicians are paid with tax dollars and if it's paid for with tax dollars, it's socialism.

Not actually correct. A country is like a household. We The People own the house, but to manage it we hire staff. The way we pay that staff and have them manage money for the household is by setting aside a portion that is earmarked for them to use on our behalf — aka, taxes. Government officials being paid by taxes or customs is not socialism. It’s paying our servants.

Not sure whether you intended to argue my point for me but thanks, I appreciate the assist.

Just so no-one gets it into their heads to intrude on this momentary lovefest:

so·cial·ism [ˈsōSHəˌlizəm]
noun
a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.

In other words, group ownership is socialism. "We the People own the house [group ownership]."

“Should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole”

Since this is not the case, we are not a socialist state and taxes to pay our servants is not socialism.

So youd rather them be paid by corporations?????.....they work the "the people" and get paid by "the people" and here's a novelty for socialist .
.

They can be fired by "the people" via elections

No, the point is that they're never going to follow through; it's just empty talk to con people who don't know better.

....and then you have Trump, that by every metric thus far, has followed through on his election commitments

Especially the ones that are illegal/violate the Constitution.

Really?.....ahh well that's the beauty of capitalust/democraciesand republics....you can have your opinions....no matter how ill informed they are

I'm glad you understand that about your opinions.

Yup, the difference is, under capitalism you’re not forced to live in poverty for equality’s sake.

Under capitalism we don’t see those in leadership murdering large numbers of people or forcing the rest to work without compensation.

Except I see that

Where?

Nice try. But slavery was abolished by capitalist societies.

No. Slavery fueled capitalism.

Maximizing production, remember? Minimizing labor costs, remember? Increasing profit, remember?

Slavery put Britain on the map, greased its Industrial Revolution.
It turned London from a swampy backwater into the financial capital of the world thanks to the banking and insurance companies that sprouted up there and grew into giant money making machines. Literally. The slave trade is directly responsible for all the banks and insurance companies located in London to this day.

In the US, the South is still relatively poor without it. During slavery, it provided the cotton, tobacco, and other crops that the manufacturing North turned into products to be traded overseas. Why do you think that even after the North got rid of its own slavery it didn't protest about it continuing in the South? The North was economically dependent on it also, albeit indirectly.

Not actually true. According to the books of Mount Vernon slavery was actually costing the economy. It also hindered innovation as slave holders could simply tell a slave to do tasks they mate as of finding new and better ways to do them.

Under socialism individual freedom does not happen, but does under capitalism. Under socialism I have no right to private property as it can be taken for society without compensation, but I have that right under capitalism. Under capitalism I can save raise some money to acquire the means of production, but under socialism I can’t. So your statement is patently false.