Black background

German 1943 law illegalizing abortion:

"A woman who kills her fetus or permits such a killing by another will be punished by a prison sentence and, in especially serious cases, by penitentiary. An attempt is punishable. Whoever else kills the fetus of a pregnant woman will be punished by a penitentiary sentence, in milder cases by prison.

If the perpetrator through such deeds continuously impairs the vitality of the German Volk, the death penalty can be imposed. Whoever procures for the pregnant woman a means or objects for killing the fetus will be punished by prison sentence, and in especially serious cases, by penitentiary."

In other words, Hitler & his Nazis made abortion illegal and potentially possible by death.

I think you replied to the wrong guy

Used my line against me. I feel so ashamed. Lesson learned.

Effin Democrats.

Dems have so much in common with Hitler... weaponizing the government to go after political rivals... censorship of free speech... racism... antisemitism... building internment camps...

Don't forget the perpetual war and trying to engineer society for the "better".
And they eat sugar too, just like Hitter!

I heard the also drink water.

Now that’s just wrong! 😂

I was going to say both breathe oxygen buuuut...

Forced vaccinations... the list is long

Another fun fact: Democrats also forcibly sterilized people based on eugenics, just like Hitler.

And Hitler, just like the dems, believes in the now debunked theory of evolution (see mitochondrial ancestor study by stoeckle)

And according to another meme, many scientists now believe Adam and Eve did exist and they lived in what is now Iraq.

Oh my gosh. What scientists?
Do they also believe that Cain went to the city of Nod to find a wife to carry on the human race because procreating with his mom would be kind of icky? So he went to a city. Elsewhere. Oh, did I mention that already?

You realize by the time of Cain there were already a ton of other children right? According to some estimates there could have been as many as 32,000 people alive during that event.

Correct. The city. Of Nod.

Adam, Eve, Cain. That's it. That was the whole of humanity. Three people. End of the line.
So Cain had to go to another city to find a wife. A city. The city called "Nod" is called a city because it was a city. The last eligible bachelor on Earth had to go to the city of Nod to find a wife because there were no more people left on Earth.

Let that sink in.

Try reading bro. It says Adam and Eve had more children, then do the math on their ages and the ages of their children and you get about 32k people alive by then.

Um, no.

No, not debunked. By no one.
In fact, the so-called 'Creationists' more recently came up with microevolution to account for evidence of actual evolution that they simply cannot discount with fairy tales about how the Levant was created. They even made an Ark museum with all types of prehistoric creatures supposedly on Noah's Ark despite them not being named by Adam.

Bro, when you spew nonsense, you really spew nonsense.
Stoeckle study shows that mitochondrial DNA (bar code ancestry tracking) goes back to a certain point in time and just stops. Also 90% of living things today do not have common ancestors. That pretty much destroys the current theory of evolution.
A few creationists pouring forward a theory that can't be proven does not do anything to the rest of them.
How do you know Adam didn't name them? The current creationists theory is that most creatures devolved to the separate species we have now by loss of information.
Even the evolutionists have had to admit there was a global flood (they say caused by tifal waves from a meteor hitting the ocean) and all cultures have a Noah's ark like story, even those that had no contact with the outside world for hundreds of years.

The purposely 'misunderstood' Stoeckle quote:

"the extant population, no matter what its current size or similarity to fossils of any age, has expanded from mitochondrial uniformity within the past 200,000 years'

They're talking about the frequency of genetic mutations in a particular gene in the mitochondrial genome over the last 200,000 years in modern species, not the original of genes altogether. Variations of that gene within a species, as expected, would be far less been compared to others species.

Although that would depend also on population size and genetic diversity for given species. Something like a cheetah which went through a genetic bottleneck and thus exhibits less genetic variability would of course show far less.

According to the misinterpretation you refer to, cheetahs have only existed for 12,000 years, which of course we know is untrue. But even 12,000 is twice as long as Earth supposedly has existed according to your mythological worldview. 200,000 years - well, you do the math.

Lungfish don't have lungs? Nice to know. I guess that means that the lungs of coelacanths and birchers aren't lungs as well. I should jot that down lest I forget.

Mudskippers are gobies without swim bladders, so nothing approaching lung function in that regard. Specialized structures in their mouth and gills help facilitate breathing out of water for them.

Some species of cetaceans have vestigial pelvises. That's because they no longer need legs to be attached to them, but they're not totally gone quite yet.

There are cultures that have flood stories, they happen all the time. If you were here in America you might have heard it on the news yesterday, occurring in Kentucky. Some are even bigger than that. None have been worldwide nor at the same time.

Research is key.

Sorry no. The Bible doesn't say 24 hour days. In fact it says light and dark were the first day, that alone could be literal millions of years. You don't need 24 hour days until the plants come along.
You need to read the quote again and then compare it to what we know. We know that some creatures have been around with fossil evidence for 200,000 years, so they all came along and expanded from microorganisms in a year right?
What their study shows is the mitochondrial DNA goes back 200,000 years and just stops for all creatures. Their quote is their attemp to justify that information. Their study also shows that 90% of living things don't have common ancestors. That alone destroys the evolutionary trees of life. In reality from genetic evidence is not a tree. It's a lawn with little sprigs of grass that branch one of twice.

The Bible who wha?

Read the study. The ACTUAL study,

You mentioned it. Also: please read the actual study. Mitochondria only goes back to a certain time and just stops. 90% of living creatures today do not have common ancestors. It's all very clear and very factual which is why this study was buried once they realized it put coffin nails in the theory of evolution.

No, I'm not the one that brought it up. You did.
When you can't tell your username from mine, you need to a new translater.

No, that is not what the study says.
They focused on a certain gene going back 200,000 years. The genes don't stop before then, that's where the study chose to focus as a starting point from.
They were looking for genetic variability within modern extant species as well as comparing that variability within a species to that of other species. It's from the mitochondrial genome for that matter. Of course those species exist today. That's what extant means.

You don't seem to understand the basics. When I say "living creatures today " of course I mean they are alive today. The study clearly shows 90% of things alive today do not have common ancestors. It completely destroys the evolutionary tree of life.

No, it does not. Quiet the opposite, in fact, focusing on a common gene.