More Encouragement for America

Hmmm... Really ?

How's about this break down: VP HARRIS exerting her ability through showcasing her authority as VIC PRESIDENT to approve Police for Biden's Pen to enact, by her powerful casting of
the individual DECIDING Vote
for passing the INFLATION REDUCTION ACT ? Has it worked out like it's title portends?

Is that a satisfactory example to wet your whistle?

https://www.whitehouse.gov/cleanenergy/inflation-reduction-act-guidebook/

😁👍

As the head of the senate, she did cast a tie-breaking vote. I'm really glad you understand that part.

But what ability or authority does she have to change policy or convince the House to do something?

...is that demonstrated inability likely to improve?

convince, do something, change policy ???

What precisely and specifically are you going on about?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I had asked you if the INFLATION REDUCTION ACT Kamala cast the deciding vote on, worked out to reduce inflation? A yes or no would suffice.
Although supportive evidence to confirm your reply might be welcome to those on the thread.

Did you sadly not understand that part, or did you just decide to mock in reply, or simply ignore the question so as to evade providing an answer ???

It's an interesting mystery.

By demonstrating leadership in her function as the President of Congress, you know, the people that actually make the laws?

By demonstrating political acumen and exercising her influence as Vice President of the United States to guide and influence the President in creating and/or changing policy?

VPs are commonly sent as dignitaries to meet and negotiate with foreign leadership on behalf of the United States..

As the "border czarina" she had agency to develop a border policy that reflected the will of the people of the United States.

So which option best describes her:

Is she a feckless buffoon?

-or-

Is she merely an identity politics token*?

*Don't think me racist for using the term "token" to describe the intent of the Chooser in Chief when it is the using of a human based solely on ethnicity to benefit one's self that is racist and not the ability to recognize the ploy. Originally I was going to use "ornament" but it did not quite capture the nuance.

She's an elected official and a public servant , making good money to do things like that . Where is Joe btw ?

You need to learn about politicians

Stop making sense

Best reply I've seen this week!

upvoted both

Same to ya!

😁👍🇺🇸🦅

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwuQtdb4guo

Leftists: The VP has no power

Also leftists: Voters chose the VP to be their candidate because she was on the ticket with Biden.

You know, like hitler. 😄

😄

You need to learn about the VP's power, the VP has no power!

Next breath...

Okay, the VP has power but not as much as the President.

Ok let me explain out for you so that your undeveloped Brain can understand.

The president has power

The vice president has power

Follow along with me

The president has a SUBSTANTIAL amount of more power then the VP. The VP can not make big decisions like the president that's why Kamala is saying she'll do that stuff when she's in office

In demonstration of your extremely superior intellect, you explained that a vice president has less power than the President.

Drawing from that same incomparable intelligence, explain to us that the lieutenant has less power than the captain.

Or that the assembly line union worker has less power the shop steward.

Or that the child has less power than the parent.

Then explain why VP Harris is unable to influence the President in a proportion equal to the power to influence decisions that the lieutenant does with the captain, the worker does with the steward, the child does the parent.

Could it be that she has no ideas?

Could it be that she has lousy ideas?

Could it be that she has no diplomatic skill?

Could it be that she has no negotiation skills?

Could it be that she has no leadership qualities?

Could it be that she is running on problems instead of solving the problems?

Explain that to me so that my undeveloped brain can understand. Perhaps use crayons.

When you finish that task, explain why you take umbrage with my comment meme that states:

"The Vice President doesn't have as much power as the President - You don't say"

Give me a very powerful display of your mental prowess by explaining to me why you explained to me what I explained as an explanation of what my explanation explained.

Maybe it's cause Joe and her think alike.

Maybe it's cause her job isn't to influence Joe.

What's Vance supposed to do influence trump to make more racist ideas to Haitians and cause more terror in Springfield

Ahh, histrionics...how supremely intellectual.

Let's stay focused on Kamala right now.

We can discuss Vance and the Haitians later.

Her job was to fix the border. The Big Guy gave her that task and authority, even a flashy title, the "border czar", yet she did...nothing.

It is the job of the Vice President to be fully engaged in serving the American people, to make suggestions, offer ideas, strategies, and plans to his or her superior to best fulfill the obligations of the office.

But she does none of these things to demonstrate leadership, diplomacy, or negotiation abilities.

No wonder no one can list her accomplishments.

List of her accomplishments why don't you use the good old thing called google and see what you can find.

It always amazes me when cheerleaders do not know what they are cheering for or why they are cheering.

I find nothing, which explains why you are unable to articulate anything.

What do you refuse to believe the facts

So when the top of the ticket drops out, the whole ticket drops out. At least that’s how it generally works. Here in America anyway.

Historically, a constituency vote was taken to determine the nominee.

Does taking a "will of the people" vote appear in the DNC Handbook or was it just a custom used to create excitement and elicit donations to the party?

Asking for myself (I have no friends).

That's actually in the handbook. It's the official time when delegates actually cast their votes. The delegates are elected at the primary, and they pledge their votes. But that's not a binding pledge, because the handbook does say they can change their minds based on how they feel about the candidate later on.

And in case there's not a clear winner by delegate votes at the convention, during the 2nd round the super delegates (people who have extra voting power as appointed by the DNC) can cast their super votes for one candidate or another in order to get one candidate over the required vote total.

It's been like this since the 60s.

Now you are saying the electoral college is a sham too?

Whaaaaaat?

Yes. Yes, I am.

I can see how one can say that.

You could have simply stated:

"Yes. The primary elections are just for show to create excitement and raise donations for the party. The vote of the constituency does not determine the nominee".

The nominee has always been selected.

It's exactly like the electoral college.