Oaths don't have exceptions

4b4h81.gif (click to show) He's right you know

Thank you!

Good one

The people that hate the constitution beg to differ.

It has been scientifically proven that the intelligence of women is inferior to men. As a result, I think we need to declare an emergency and (at least temporarily) ban the 19th amendment.

Why do doctors slap babies' bottoms as soon as they're born?
To pop the p**ises out on the smart ones.

The internet allows you to learn and investigate information.

No exceptions. The right to free speech extends even to presidents and phones indictments to steal an election are just that.

They will chant "Love trumps hate."

TDS sufferers just hate Trump.

Accusations aren’t proof nor conviction despite your feelz. Especially considering the repeated lies and cover ups that have been encountered from this administration and it’s AG.

True . . . those years of Leftist, RINOs, and the fanatically leftist-loyal mainstream media taking Trump/Russia accusations against Trump as PROOF against Trump based on what ALL of them already knew to be a Hillary Clinton bought and paid for Russian Disinformation 'dossier' compiled by an ex-spy desperately in need of money and known for hating Trump with a passion . . . sort of clued-in intelligent people in possession of ethics, honor, and integrity that Leftists, RINOs, and the Mainstream Media had . . . no ethics, honor, or integrity.

Couldn’t have said it better myself

Because if we say it he’s guilty? 😂

You mean 12 impartial jurors? Can’t be had in DC. Kangaroo courts don’t dispense Justice.

Cute, you're worried about juror bias, yet you believe that Trump's lawyer is so incompetent that he can't raise objection. Seems like Trump's Lawyer is asleep on the job. Or *Gasp* all this "Bias because they don't agree with me." is the mountain you made out of a mole hill.

When loooking at jurors, Trump's lawyer must first take great care in the jury selection procedure. The court and the counsel may interrogate potential jurors during the “voir dire” procedure to determine whether they might have any actual or inferred bias. Jurors are expected to answer questions truthfully; if any indication of bias is found, they will be removed from the jury. Peremptory objections to the jury selection process are another option available to the criminal defense attorney.

Lemme guess, the only jurors you'll accept are those wearing MAGA hats?

😂

Based on the ethics displayed by the left, no one in DC can be trusted and no irrational TDS sufferers can even pretend to be objective. You certainly wouldn’t qualify.

TDS? I think we're beyond that, honestly as there's now enough evidence to convince multiple grand juries of Trump's criminal activities to warrant a trial in each of their respective courts.

Unless you're changing the meaning to Trump Dependency Syndrome, which is what the right seems to suffer as Anyone who championed Trump in the mid-terms got voted out, yet the Republican Party is still doubling down on it.

:( Sad.

Grand Jury indictments only hear one side and no defense. I’m sure you equivocate that to a fair trial but real Americans don’t. Based on the past record of false impeachment against the Cheeto everyone knows the system is corrupt and not unbiased.

TDS is and always has meant Trump Derangement Syndrome and sufferers will deny reality as long as it is against the focus of their anxiety. As to the Republican Party which one. The Rino party sides with Democrats so it is the people who are supporting him apparently. Be they Republican or Independent they are awake to the woke nonsense and green agenda lefties push.

Can a conservative get a fair trial in any blue city? Can anybody put politics aside and rule by the law?

That is a rhetorical question.☹️