This is ultimate misogyny

You nailed it JakkFrost. What the left is doing to women is pure misogyny, 100% plain and simple.

What's curious to me, is why aren't liberal women bothered by the fact that they are being "libtard langauged" out of existence?

Their own woke party can't refer to them by anything other than:

a) the opposite of the opposite sex (meaning their definition requires context relative to men, and is based 100% on men, therefore requires men)

OR

b) something other than a biological function (since the left now calls them birthing people, or menstruators, etc...)

How much of this crap will they just sit back and take before they get damn fed up?

I think the feminist leadership convinced itself that all its political goals and dreams are tied up with the Left. That's where it gets its side funding and goes to whenever it has a legal issue of a national nature -- as long as it doesn't conflict with an issue that the Left's collective leadership figures is more important -- and there's the rub.

Lately . . . everything else has been more important to the Left's leadership.

Yeah, that's the thing that should make people suspicious, why isn't Feminism up in arms about this schtick? Even TIRFs should have had enough of this by now.

The fact is, Feminism is nothing but a big money brand name. They don't want to give up the juicy government funding, all the public donations, not to mention the political clout tied to the name. That's why they absolutely loathe when people call themselves "Egalitarian" (which is TRUE equality), it's a threat to their brand image and finances.

Going against left-wing narratives right now would also risk causing Feminism's corporeligious empire to come tumbling down. That's why it stays silent... unless it's attacking women who have had enough and are speaking out.

It's how the Left operates - Infiltrate, infect, corrupt.
Look at the history of feminism. It was absolutely nothing like it was originally. It got to the point that the original and new are totally alien to one another.

Well said. Only women as individuals -- or the true feminists -- are speaking out against the massive psychological damage done to youngsters as their entire sexual identity are erased by the increasingly insane political Left in the name of 'equity'.

Exactly, and equity isn't how you lift people up, it's how you keep people down.

Yep.

Liberal women probably feel empathy for trans people without knowing the ramifications of the trans agenda.

As Sheldon Cooper might say, Bazingo!

Non-men?

It's pronounced wo-men.

Silly PhD holders! 😄

This is all attention seeking behavior and virtue signalling.

Ignore it and it will dissipate on its own.

Of course something else will be dreamed up to "make you look".

Or sometimes, if you ignore it, it becomes infected, then the infection spreads, which is what has happened.

Or that...either way, it is already waning.

People are tired of the constant assault on their values.

Will there be a boycott of John Hopkins?

You don't cast society into upheaval to appease a minute group that intentionally creates adversity in the attempt to achieve protected class status.

Sorry, forgot to upvote 😅

following, and we'll go from there.

🍏

Nope. With left-wing coconuts in charge of the nuthouse, I jumped.

So, no up vote?

Wasn't sure of your intention.

Yeah, I'm pretty up front with what I post....😏

Wait, seriously???

That was 3 years ago or so

First I ever heard of it, jeezus pleezus! 🤦‍♂️

I read that somewhere and then made this meme. If you look at the font, it must have been on The Gateway pundit. Yes, indeed 🤦‍♂️

Using the phrase "non-men" seems to actually a weird attempt to re-introduce a gender binary. There's men, then there's everything else.

Scientifically, all fetuses start off female, then differentiate during development, so non-female would actually be more scientifically accurate.

The probable reason for using non-male (rather than non-female), is there is almost no backlash against trans males trying to use male only spaces, but there is a huge backlash against trans females trying to enter female only spaces (sports, locker rooms, identifying as lesbian, but being mad real lesbians aren't interested, etc.). They are trying to redefine female only spaces as merely non-male spaces. Very few would argue that a trans female is a man. But many would argue that they aren't real women/females, and thus don't belong in places that are exclusively for females.

So, a wall of words to say male and female.

I realized I was being far too forgiving in my interpretation of intent.

"Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it."