Jacob Chansley dress code violation

He wasn't sent to prison for treason. Get your facts straight

Okay,.so why? Video shows no vio....
Nevermind.

Except he was sent to prison... You don't get sent to prison without a reason and there were some pretty damn good reasons against him.

He is a clinically diagnosed mental patient who was sentenced "obstructing an official proceeding"

You must watch left wing news

Well I'd hate to be the right and have a mental man on the news, breaking into government property, yelling and being destructive. I'm embarrassed for you and your party.

Oh well thanks, that changes nothing.

Ok. But the photos clearly show it though. So.

You’re delusional, there is nothing in what he did that is treason.

And the government took it easy on him? puleese

It's YOUR meme!!! You're the one who said the government's been picking on him.

no I didn't

Scroll up to the top of the page with the big giant picture. You don't remember making that?

Treason?

Quite an over-reaction, and actually just plain, flat-out wrong, thesis.

But the left never has let facts get in the way of making a point, right?

Well then Trump must be part of the left

Well, Trump did dontate to all 2 parties.

As a life-long member of the left... Allow me to say that we don't know or endorse that guy... And unlike him, I hope you'll agree that when I make an argument that I bring the receipts - and I'm willing to consider alternative sets of facts, and different opinions...

That seems like it's a description of the Democrats - whom I hold are actually members of the Center-right.

Oh, stop the bullshit for once, already.

Don't like me telling the truth, do you?

When have you ever done that, you?

Every time you get flustered and all you can say is "bullshit". Kind of a sign that I hit the nail on the head.

Again, when have you ever told any truth?

I just did.

Yep…I definitely struck a nerve.
😂

No, I think antithesis kinda pissed you all off simultaneously and won a damn good argument

Wet and slobbery kisses

That’s only because you don’t know any better, kid

If we are using the kid excuse than I can call you grandpa so get your psych meds ready gramps. You and your bs "cOviD TrUtH" stream can go get vaccinated. I love you attack Antithesis about not telling the truth when your entire stream seems to be one big lie. Isn't that weird.

I've always liked horseshit, why? Cuz it makes some people think. 😊

He was protesting what he believed to be election fraud. That is not treason. Even if there wasn't election fraud, he has a right to protest it. He may be guilty of trespassing, but when the doors are intentionally opened to allow a crowd in, that's questionable at best. You could probably argue for a charge of disorderly conduct, but that's about it.

No. He was demanding that the presidential ceremony be cancelled to declare somebody else president. It was not that long ago - we all remember that day. The courts already threw out the cases 70 times for lack of evidence - what you were demanding that day was to skip the proof of fraud and change the government regardless.

First off, I wasn't demanding shit. your attempt to group everyone who disagrees with your exact misinterpretation of what happened with the extremist is very telling. You have a religious obedience to your political party.Very few were demanding due process be skipped. I'm not saying they were right about there being election fraud, and I'm not saying lesser crimes were not committed, but it was not treason.

Very few? You were arguing with me personally - you, boredmeme, with me - that Pence was somehow able to be pressured into overriding the election! I kept telling you it wasn't going to happen and you kept saying to just watch.

That never happened. I haven't even been here in months.

Well, I still never said anything about Pence overriding anything. For awhile I was convinced that if an investigation was done, they would find proof of fraud. And even then I agreed it probably wouldn't be enough to change the result of the election.

Wait... He gave aid or comfort to a hostile nation in a time of war? You know that words you're misusing have actual definitions...right?

The guy took selfies with the Capitol Hill Police. How is that Treasonous?

The Dems ALWAYS accuse others of what they themselves are GUILTY of.

Yes. You are onto something, there. And as an actual leftist - I can say that from real experience - you see the scars on my back.

He tried to overthrow the elected government to press an illegitimate claim of someone who didn't win. 🤷‍♀️

With what? An American 🇺🇸 and Viking horns?
Quit your pearl-clutching, drama-mama.

That’s what is known as a political prop.
You lefties use political props all the time.

And the fact that y'all explicitly stated that you expected Pence to override the election at that exact meeting was completely unrelated?

No buyers, sorry.

Of course we expected the VP to be loyal to the President and the party.
But he of the Washington political class and he goes along with the uniparty.
You would have drawn and quartered Biden if he hadn’t backed Obama.
Yep… still striking nerve!

LOL… no, he set the stage for no one ever trusting an election again.
He also is an object lesson… be very careful in your consideration of a running mate. You gotta make damn sure he is on your side, otherwise, you get more of this lunacy.

Your not the President until you are sworn in and taken the oath of office.
You see how that works?
Still striking that nerve!
I could probably do this all day…

7e6yq8.jpg (click to show)

7e7qdj.jpg (click to show)

7e8slq.jpg (click to show)

The Senate and the House must vote to accept the tallies reported from each State. This wasn't the FIRST TIME that OBJECTIONS were raised as to the legitimacy of reported elections results for the Presidency (2000, 2016 - [cough cough]).

Ironically - the stage managed and agent provocateur led PSYOP 'Riot' - was what prevented several Senators from registering their apparently proper objections, and then calling for debate and inquiry, into the legitimacy of the tallies reported. And it wasn't the first time people had suggested that Electoral Collegians should follow their own consciences.

In any event - if an election is contested, and there's no clear winner - it gets thrown to the House of Representatives, at that time, in Democratic Party hands... So this was more about attempts to criminalize dissent, invoke Martial Law/Emergency Powers and unconstitutional censorship, using Government agents. The plans for a New Patriot Act were laid out in the Spring of 2020 by Congress, in collusion with elements of the DHS and FBI.
Rep. Cory Bush put forward her resolution to Censure or Remove several Pro-Trump Congressmen - on January 5th. Nancy Pelosi gad included budgeting for repairs and 'Security Upgrades' to the Capitol - prior to the events of January 6th, as well.

Electoral Collegians WERE following their own conscience. You were trying to replace them with other people who you liked better so that you could greet a different answer.

You keep pretending that I'm a Trump supporter. I'm not. I support HONEST Government and Election Integrity. We can't say for certain what the Electoral College was following. As in 2016 - there were pressures brought to bear upon them by both sides - and unlike 2016, several States had passed "faithless Electors" statutes (which have yet to be tested for lawfulness).

https://21stcenturywire.com/2020/09/20/democrat-led-transition-integrity-project-plan-for-post-election-chaos/

"Hillary Clinton Tells Joe Biden Not To Accept The Election Results If ..."
https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/17/politics/hillary-clinton-defense-of-democracy-speech/index.html

The early AM vote flips in key States, were highly suspicious. When most people went to sleep - Trump was the clear victor. By dawn the next morning we were told of a Biden 'miracle' - which could never be questioned, without people getting their social media accounts suspended, and their posts suppressed or removed. And it all looks to have been part of the DNCIA/Clintonite plan. Win or lose - lie cheat or steal - the REAL STATE - wasn't going to let Trump win.

We now know that the FBI censored the oldest Newspaper in the country - for printing a TRUE STORY, about Hunter's dirty laptop. That's a laptop chock full of crimes, and evidence proving that Joe had LIED to the American people repeatedly - about his connections to Hunter's crooked dealings in Ukraine and China.

https://www.deseret.com/2022/12/2/23490521/elon-musk-twitter-hunter-biden-laptop-censor-taibbi-reports

https://www.deseret.com/2023/3/9/23632346/chris-stewart-twitter-files-matt-taibbi-michael-shallenberger-fbi-twiiter-first-amendment

THE FIX WAS IN.

Personally - I had no dogs in that fight. I wrote-in Jesse Ventura and Cynthia McKinney. And I couldn't tell which evil was the lesser.

As USUAL @antithesis is LYING (that's what FAKE LEFTIST SPIES do, for corrupt Imperialist-warmonger Democrats - what ACTUAL Leftist, and longtime Peace Activist Cindy Shehan calls "Garbage People") and HAS a 'BlueDog' Democrat in this fight. In fact LOTS of votes were proven fraudulent - which is WHY - the narrative has shifted, from "there's NO EVIDENCE", to "there's NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE, to have changed the results".

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/11/04/chairman-of-ga-gop-fulton-county-told-observers-to-leave-continued-to-count-ballots-in-secret/

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/12/03/video-georgia-vote-counters-suitcases-ballots-table-observers-media-leave/

Now it IS true that CIA DISINFORMATIONAL "Fact Checking" sites dispute this version of events - but these are sites which are KNOWN, PROVEN LIARS. The same sites all called the story about Hunter's laptop "Russian Disinformation" - while failing to acknowledge and report that the FBI had had the actual laptop for at least 1 year, prior to the story emerging, and knew that it was legitimate. The same sites either ignore the report of the IPCW's Fact Finding Mission to Douma/"IPCW Whistleblowers", and continue to fraudulently report as true a "Chemical Attack" in Douma, by the Syrian Arab Army - or they just don't mention the story.

One "Fact-Checker" "Snopes" - writes THIS about Seymour Hersh's brave and accurate reporting about the terrorist warcriminal attack of Biden Gang's, against the Nordstream Pipelines:

"This story, when deconstructed, is merely a pile of purported second-hand information allegedly collected by someone connected in some unknown way to deliberations of a highly secret, multi-agency task force. Such a story falls prey to the same criticisms of other more recent work published by Hersh, which has relied on similarly questionable anonymous sources." - one the stories they are criticising in a collateral fashion - is the IPCW Whistleblower/Fake Douma "Chemical attack", produced by the Syrian Al Qaeda affiliates/ISIS, and "The White Helmets" - their propaganda arm. They don't even go to the trouble to offer the same kind of critique, about that laughable and disproven story. In the case of the Nordstream Pipelines story, they cite as an allegedly 'credible sources' "Business Insider" and an entity using the name Mia Jankowicz (relationship to DHS, unclear) "Claim by a Discredited Journalist ... Is Proving a Gift to Putin." and Reuters.

You OBVIOUSLY had a dog in the fight, otherwise you wouldn't still be sore about the fact that not one single vote was EVER proven fraudulent, let alone the millions that would be needed to actually sway the election.

https://blackboxvoting.org/proof-of-fraud/

And that's not even taking into account, the addition of mass distributed, untraceable, unauditable mail-in ballots - printed without any unique identifiers or numbering - justified under the fear of the PLANDEMIC - and instituted under Emergency Powers with little debate.

In the most recent election, it's reported that Los Angeles was sent 50,000 more ballots, than it has Registered Voters. The Secretary of State's office refused comment.

The courts have commented. Lack of evidence, case dismissed. Out of 50,000 ballots you have not had a single one struck down.

Courts are only as good as the evidence that unbiased judges have allowed to be presented. Courts get things wrong all the time if higher courts refuse to entertain an appeal - you're stuck with bad law and bad rulings, as we tend to be here in the USA.

DID YOU EVEN LOOK at the link I provided you? You can never get access to the evidence - because the courts sustain the claims of "proprietary trade secrets" made by the systems' manufacturers. This is absurd. The one recent instance where a REAL audit was allowed (Maricopa County, Arizona) - serious irregularities and cheating were found to be in evidence.

There wasn't a case brought about the ~50k extra ballots sent to LA County...that was a press inquiry, by someone who did the math.

Well don't worry, the president who appointed such biased judges lost the election and has been replaced. What more do you want?

You're making assumptions about which President appointed which Judges. And you're ignoring the stunning self-reversal in Georgia - where a court ordered the systems data and logs from Nov. 2020 preserved, in order for more evidence to be collected and examined - only to rescind the order shortly afterwards. Things like this speak to blatant criminality, which our courts are sadly implicated in, as well.

The fish rots from the head. Any semblance of impartiality and propriety in our courts was dispelled by that most irresponsible and irregular ruling, handed down in Bush v. Gore. From that point forward, it seems that our courts have been transparent in their political and ultra vires nature, in regards to elections. They seem to be less interested in protecting the will of the voters, than those who maliciously and deliberately thwart it. The system cheats in unison. One need look no further than the case that Tim Canova brought against Brenda Snipes in 2016. The court found that she'd deliberately destroyed the ballot evidence, in violation of both State and Federal laws. But seemingly because the plaintiff was a progressive outsider - going up against a corrupt, Clintonite, NeoCon (some redundancy here) apparatchik in Debbie Wasserman Shultz - no investigation was ever launched, no charges were ever brought.

I'm really not. Look it up. Several of those judges were appointed by the exact president trying to argue that the election should have been in his favor. You can't get a fairer shake than that AND HE STILL LOST THE CASE!

Judges don't owe allegiance to the guy who appoints them. They can be bought, or pressured, enticed with advancement up the ladder. Trump doesn't know anything about Judges. He picked names off of a list from the Federalist society, in consultation with McConnell and other GOP Senators. I don't believe that in every case the Judges were Trump appointees - but even if they were, that's not really relevant.

I was watching those cases. The courts REFUSED to allow discovery, or look at evidence. The one court that DID allow for the mere preservation of evidence, appears to have gotten a talking to by someone - and then reversed its own order. That's MOST irregular.

@antithesis has it half correct, as usual - meaning his statement reads as "False". Trump is no longer the President - but there's no way to certify the accuracy and security of ANY US election - which is why the Jimmy Carter center doesn't even try. You can say accurately that Trump has been REPORTED to have lost that election - but substantiating and auditing those reports is essentially impossible.

https://blackboxvoting.org/proof-of-fraud/

And that ^^^^ was written before the time if mass printed, mass distributed, Vote-by-mail ballots, authorized using "Emergency Powers" - with the Covid Plandemic as the excuse.

Well, don't worry, the president who was appointing such buyable, pressurable, and enticeable judges lost the election and has been replaced.

Exactly he clearly committed some crime