Everything we told you was true and you called it "fake" news.

Spoken like a true China bot

There is a reason why this meme didn't say anything about the election. BECAUSE IT IS ALL ABOUT COVID. If I wanted to make a meme about the election, it would be about the election, not COVID. That is just how thinks work in the real world. I guess you didn't understand that.

Everything the left said about COVID for the last 3 years was wrong and how many people died unnecessarily because your side got so tyrannical with your agenda?

As far as the 2020 election is concerned, it is just a foregone conclusion that the election was stolen.

What's even more amazing is you think you're right.

Oh, so I'm wrong about this whole meme being wrong?

Should be easy enough to prove that, right?

Pick one thing on that list. One thing.

And prove me wrong about it.

here's the thing: bring data. bring facts. All of it backed by science. Documented. Repeatable. Science.

Not some link to natural immunity . org or whatever. Real. Science.

I await your response.

1 thing? How about the vaccine being 100% safe? Is it? What has the latest science said about it because I am sure you can dig up tons of articles from the middle of the pandemic that will support your argument with "documented and repeatable science". If it is safe then no one should have any negative effects from the vaccine whatsoever. Has that happened?

Has the vaccine prevented people from getting COVID as it was promised before it was even available? I got the vaccine and I still got COVID and so did my wife. I don't need a scientist to tell me anything, I know from personal experience that I was lied to when I was told by your scientists that the vaccine would be 100% effective in preventing COVID infections.

They knew when they were saying that that was a lie. The knew that all viruses eventually mutate and if their vaccine was created to target a specific mutation of a virus then all other mutations would most likely be unaffected by it.

1) No vaccine in the history of vaccines has been 100% safe. Not one. NO one ever promised you that. Well, no one who even has a passing knowledge of vaccines. I'm sure that the anti-vaxx echo chamber has claimed that Fauci said it was 100% safe.

2) No vaccine in the history of vaccines has not had side effects for some portion of the population. No one promised you that it was 100% side-effect free. Oh, I'm sure the anti-vaxx crowd has claimed that someone said it was 100% side-effect free. But it, like all the other vaccines, isn't. All vaccines have side effects. Some of them are even lethal (see small pox vaccine).

3) No vaccine in the history of vaccines has been 100% effective. Not one. In fact, the one you're probably thinking of now is the Small Pox vaccine. The one that wiped out small pox. It's only 87% effective. So how did it wipe out a disease? Literally everyone who could get it, got it. Also, it's one of the most dangerous ones. And claiming that we shouldn't be using a vaccine until it's 100% effective is asinine. You may not remember it, but the efficacy rating of the covid vaccine was discussed. And how the different manufacturers had different ratings, because some were more or less effective than others.

No one said they were 100% effective. Well, again, I am sure the anti-vaxx crowd has claimed that, but that is a lie.

And apparently you do need a scientist because you don't know how vaccines work.

Science didn't lie to you. The anti-vaxx crowd has certainly lied to you. Lied to you about what science has said about vaccines, and specifically about the covid vaccines.

And while your personal experience with previous vaccines has led you to believe that they're 100% effective, it's simply not true. The appear 100% effective when close to 100% of the population gets them.

When we're all 87+% resistant to a disease, the occasional breakthrough infection doesn't spread any further. And it doesn't have a chance to mutate. (again, no one claimed it wouldn't mutate). And when it doesn't mutate, the existing vaccine doesn't need to be updated.

And eventually, the disease is wiped out.

Wanna try another one on your list?

1) Rachel Maddow said if you take the vaccine you will not get the virus. Fauci said it was 95% effective. I'm really shocked that you would deny the preponderance of information that was released telling everyone that if they took the vaccine they would not get the virus. Maybe you forgot. I remember it. No one is saying it now because it is glaringly obvious that the vaccine is closer to a placebo than anything else. Yet, there are all sorts of commercials strongly suggesting we still get the vaccine.

2) I agree. But when we were saying that back in 2020, 21 and even early 2022 all we got was push back from the left. It is really easy to say this now.

3) I agree. But when we were saying that back in 2020, 21 and even early 2022 all we got was push back from the left. It is really easy to say this now.

Prior to COVID anti-vaxxers are the ones who believed that vaccines have chemicals, in addition to the medicine, that they think leads to conditions like autism. I am not an anti-vaxxer.

However, after COVID anti-vaxxer meant anyone who did not agree with forced vaccination or someone who refused to take the vaccine. I got vaccinated but I never ever believed in forced to do ANYTHING, let alone have some unknown and untested substance be injected into my body. Some substance that the pharmaceutical industry received complete immunity from prosecution. A substance they are not legally obligated to reveal what is in it until 75 years from now.

I got vaccinated, not because I believed all of the lies that were being told and I never believed that the vaccine would be anywhere close to 100% effective. I have more faith in hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin then the vaccine.

I never at anytime said that science lied to me. I don't think that science had anything to do with what was happening. I think Fauci is more political hack than scientist. He's a real doctor and has a lot of medical experience. I am not denying that. What I am saying is Fauci is corrupt.

Maybe I should have lead with this but please tell me how the virus was not from a lab in Wuhan, China. I want to hear that.

Sure. All of the first infections happened physically around 2 different animal markets that sold the same kind of animals.

Those markets were across town (and a river) from the lab.

There are 2 lineages, B & A. A was stopped inside of China. B got out into the world.

The 2nd and subsequent waves of infection were diffused throughout the city.

So, we know that the infections came from those points. The market physical environments were also swabbed, and covid was found in the wild animal pens.

We'll likely never know more than this, as the markets were sterilized and all the animals destroyed.

A lab leak, by comparison, would have a single lineage. The one that got carried out. The first wave of infections would be the staff, their families, and the places they physically went before knowing they were infected. The physical sites near the lab. Their homes, and the people who lived near them.

That didn't happen.

You can read some science: https://virological.org/t/early-appearance-of-two-distinct-genomic-lineages-of-sars-cov-2-in-different-wuhan-wildlife-markets-suggests-sars-cov-2-has-a-natural-origin/691

Here's a study with some nice maps and other visualizations: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abp8715

An easier to read article about it: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02519-1

The closest thing I've seen to anything pointing to a lab leak is a specific gene sequence that is used in gain of function experiments. But that sequence also appears in nature. It's rare. But it still happens. So, it's not definitive proof of a lab.

Given the strength of all the other zoological evidence, it's likely just a coincidence.

There are currently 7 known sars-covid viruses that jumped from animals to humans. Covid is one of them. There was the original sars back in 2002. Then MERS back in 2012.

So, lots of facts that point to a zoological origin. Not a lot for a lab leak.

You might want to update your sources. What you told me is the myth. It was the cover story for what really happened.

FBI Directory Christopher Wray says that the FBI believes that the virus was created in a "Chinese government-controlled lab".

Right now there is a major media smear attempt going on to maintain the myth. Why? There are a gazillion possible reasons why the myth needs to be maintained. The most probable reason is because China is trying to not look like the bad guy. But there is just so much more than that.

Here is what happened. Back in 2014 an American scientist (whose name I have forgotten) flew to Wuhan to help out in China's gain of function lab in Wuhan. They were working on trying to find a way to make a virus found in bat guano contagious. They worked on this for a few years with Chinese and American dollars funding it. At one point Obama shut down funding for the project. Dr. Fauci found some way to keep the funds going.

Here is the thing, they were working on a vaccine alongside with all of their research. After several years they found a way to combine a coronavirus (the virus of common cold). The new virus was named for the year it was created, COVID-19 as in 2019.

In October of 2019 Event 201 was held. It was a conference sponsored by Johns Hopkins University, the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation. This conference was to discuss what to do in the event that a global pandemic happened.

It is my belief that this event wasn't about the possibility but rather what to do now that there was a potentially deadly virus. I cannot prove any of that but I do know that the World Economic Forum is working on creating a global fascist government and that is a fact. Klaus Schwab is the Hitler of our day.

In an article by the BBC, trying to debunk the fact that the virus was created in a lab, they even tried to show you on a map that the lab was a 40 minute drive from the wet market where the virus allegedly came from. This is what you would call misinformation. The wet market where the virus was leaked was actually across the street from the lab.

Here is the thing. There is nothing that conclusively says that the virus was leaked on purpose. It could have been accidental or it could have been intentional. China will never ever let us know one way or another. China also controls WHO so they cannot be trusted. They own Joe Biden also.

These are the facts.

So, right off, this is all conspiracy nonsense.

Wray did not say that the FBI believes that the virus was created in a lab.

He said that the FBI has a report that says they have Moderate Confidence that it was a lab based virus. Moderate Confidence is a specific term in the intel community.

Moderate confidence generally means that the information is credibly sourced and plausible
but not of sufficient quality or corroborated sufficiently to warrant a higher level of
confidence.

The other intel agencies that have looked into it being lab born have produced reports that say Low Confidence.

Low Confidence: means that the information’s credibility and/or plausibility is questionable, or that the information is too fragmented or poorly corroborated to make solid analytic inferences, or that we have significant concerns or problems with the sources.

So, what is the FBI and the other intel sources telling you?

There's no credible evidence to support a lab leak theory. The FBI is saying they have a credible source but they can't prove it.

Facts matter. Verifiable data matters.

All this other stuff? It's fluffy and nonsense. It's fever dreams of crazy people.

One world government headed up by Schwab is just silly.

It's QAnonsense.

Check back into the real world.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/marisadellatto/2023/02/26/timeline-how-the-covid-lab-leak-origin-story-went-from-conspiracy-theory-to-government-debate/?sh=6ba47b9437b9

https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/26/politics/covid-lab-leak-wuhan-china-intelligence/index.html

How is something considered "most likely" and at the same time be considered "low confidence"?

"One world government headed up by Schwab is just silly."

Yeah, when you pay absolutely no attention to what Schwab and the WEF is saying then you can believe it is "silly". The problem is IT IS ALREADY HAPPENING.

You need to understand that I don't give a flying crap about QAnon. I have no idea what they believe. Instead I go straight to the WEF's website. They're not shy about their plans.

They have already began creating what they call "smart cities". These cities employ cameras located all over the city and they use facial recognition software to monitor people's movement and activities.

Businesses are being assigned ESG scores, which is a social credit scoring system. Right now it is voluntary and there is no enforcement but the plans are that the world's top financial lenders will control what kinds of loans they will pay out based on a business' ESG score, not their ability to pay back their debt. This public/private partnership between the WEF, the IMF, the UN with the top financial lenders already exists.

Schwab said the WEF is working on a portable device that people will wear that will montior their individual ESG score. He is also working on technology where, with an implant, your moods and eventually thoughts can be monitored.

The goal is that they will create a global government. All existing nations will keep their boundaries but the ultimate authority will be the global fascist government.

How this will happen is with the Great Reset. Nations who have committed to the Great Reset (BTW the WEF's slogan for the Great Reset is "Build Back Better". Gee... where have I heard that before?) will began printing currency had an accelerated rate and cause massive inflation. Eventually this will act in a domino effect as one nation's economy collapses, it will trigger the next. Of course the United States is the ultimate target. We are the biggest domino.

There is just so much more. And believe me when I tell you this. I did not get this information from some fringe conspiracy group. I went straight to the WEF's website. You'll have to dig a little but it is all there.

how can it be "most likely" and Low Confidence at the same time?

Because the headline writer at CNN did their job and got you to click on the link.

But if you read the actual article you'll see that the DoE rates it as Low Confidence.

Here's a report from the NIC that clearly defines the levels of confidence: https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/Newsroom/Reports%20and%20Pubs/20071203_release.pdf

So... they have shady sources and what the sources say can't be confirmed.

The FBI, the highest of all the confidence, says their source is reputable but what they say can't be confirmed.

they're all telling you the same thing: there's no evidence this was a lab leak.

"But if you read the actual article you'll see that the DoE rates it as Low Confidence."

CNN is less trustworthy than MSNBC. I was not at all surprised that they would lead with one headline and then continue the narrative even though both the FBI and the Dept of Energy have said that the virus "most likely" leaked from the lab in Wuhan.

But they aren't the only ones who believe that. Fauci knows for a fact that the virus was leaked because he was involved in the creation of the virus. He funded its development with taxpayer dollars. But Fauci will never stop hiding behind to leftist narrative.

I'll have to see if I can find the name of the US doctor who was sent to China to develop this virus. It's been awhile since I found out all this stuff and I didn't expect I would ever run into a true believer in the narrative. So I didn't save any of it.

Regardless of what the FBI and the Dept of Energy said, there is still all of the documentation of the efforts to create the virus.

Me, personally, I believe the leak was intentional. There is no way to prove it, but my gut just says this was part of a plan.

Could it have been a plan to weaken the US and the world's economics to make it easier for China to continue buying everything on the planet? Could this have been just the 1st step in depopulating the planet? Could this have just been a trial run to see how easy it would be to get people to comply with tyranny? Could it be all of the above?

Or was it a actually just an accidental leak. Some lab tech may have unknowingly contracted the virus, went to lunch at the wet market across the street and then sneezed on someone. Or maybe they just farted in their general direction (sorry. Just felt like a little Monty Python needed to be injected into this conversation).

You've got to respect the commitment of the black white supremacist.
Clayton Bigsby would be so proud.