Well PA, you certainly know how to flush your state down the dirtiest bus depot toilet

Neck says, "Here we go. Proof?"
--Umm, the US Supreme Court, who ordered Pennsylvania not to count unmarked or incorrectly dated mail in ballots and they did it anyway. That's called fraud.

Did you mean the Pennsylvania Supreme Court?

Has anyone claimed that they did count unmarked or incorrectly dated mail in ballots?

Or are you just assuming that because the Democrat won, they did?

Gumshoe says, "Did you mean the Pennsylvania Supreme Court?"
--You mean you're still ignorant about the Supreme court's order NOT to count unmarked or incorrectly dated ballots?

"Has anyone claimed that they did count unmarked or incorrectly dated mail in ballots?"
--Yes, they openly said they would lol

"Or are you just assuming that because the Democrat won, they did?"
--Do you know what an internet search is? lol

Oof, you might want to take a look at some sources.

First, the US Supreme Court has issued no order on mail-in ballots, but rather denied an order to block the counting of undated mail-in ballots. Later, they threw out a 3rd circuit ruling that said undated mail-in ballots must be counted. However, throwing out the 3rd circuit ruling was only to prevent it from becoming a precedent in the other states where the 3rd circuit resides over.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-backs-republican-pennsylvania-ballots-case-2022-10-11/

Second, it was the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, not the US Supreme Court, that finally clarified the status of undated mail-in ballots, and that they must be segregated and left uncounted.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.inquirer.com/politics/election/pennsylvania-supreme-court-undated-mail-ballots-20221101.html%3FoutputType%3Damp

John Fetterman has sued the court, again citing the same reasons as the 3rd Circuit Court’s decision to allow undated ballots. It has yet to be determined what will come from that, but as it stands, aside from arguing that the undated ballots should be counted, I’ve found no evidence that they have been. Nor anyone claiming that have.

Mind citing your sources or are your facts based on your opinion?

It would explain your confusion of the US Supreme Court and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling.

Next time, check your facts before being snarky.

I erred in thinking they made cheating official but do you really think Pennsylvania, of all places, obeyed the law? So you honestly believe they set aside the ballots rather than comingle them? You also believe in UFOs? How about Epstein killing himself with tissue paper? LOL

I can think anything. I like to deal with facts. According to your logic, either Republicans let Democrats cheat or too incompetent to prove it. Perhaps I’m too much of an optimistic toward Republicans to think the evidence just doesn’t exist.

As for UFOs, yeah they exist. Are they extraterrestrial? Unlikely. Most likely they’re either man-made, blips, hallucinations.

It was his bedsheet. And I believe Epstein was murdered. Just don’t think it was just Democrats and liberal elitists who benefited.

See, I deal I’m facts. I won’t say whom benefited or make up fantastic stories about aliens. They’re neat to hypothesis. But they’re no basis to make a formed decision or an informed opinion.

Speculation is fun.

Facts need evidence.

Gumshoe says, "I can think anything. I like to deal with facts. "
--lol, yeah I sorta doubt that last part. You're behaving like the official corporate media account is truth. Tell me again how you think Epstein killed himself with tissue paper?

"According to your logic, either Republicans let Democrats cheat or too incompetent to prove it."
--As Richard Baris, one of the most accurate pollsters in this country observed, the RINO leadership like Mccarthy and Mcconnell didn't want MAGA candidates to win - so they sabotaged them with zero funding. The numbers are publicly available if you can handle the facts.

"As for UFOs, yeah they exist. Are they extraterrestrial? Unlikely. Most likely they’re either man-made, blips, hallucinations."
--Go to the History channel for your speculations, we're dealing with facts here

"It was his bedsheet. And I believe Epstein was murdered. Just don’t think it was just Democrats and liberal elitists who benefited."
--His bedsheets were made of tissue paper because being on suicide watch doesn't entitle most to normal sheets. And his bed was four feet off the ground. Trying doing the math on that one.

"See, I deal I’m facts. I won’t say whom benefited or make up fantastic stories about aliens. They’re neat to hypothesis. But they’re no basis to make a formed decision or an informed opinion."
--You're really not based on your statements here. If I can debunk them so should you if you were intellectually honest. lol

"Facts need evidence."
--Yet you still claim Epstein murdered himself with tissue soft bedsheets off a four foot bed or that Biden legitimately won more ballots than Obama. lol

If you want to talk about epstein, there are far more inconsistencies to rule that it probably wasn't suicide. There are honestly less inconsistencies to rule that the 2020 election was as fabricated. Pun intended.

If I was coming off as an official corporate media account, I wouldn't be as cynical to the idea that he killed himself - or that the official account leaves more to be desired.

Gumshoe says, "There are honestly less inconsistencies to rule that the 2020 election was as fabricated."
--That makes you a Fraud denier. The level of mail in ballot fraud is legendary. There's a reason why we're the only country that uses this fraud mechanic. The embarrassment that is Arizona and Nevada with their deliberate slow walking to 'find' enough Democrat ballots is further proof except of course for those who still believe Epstein killed himself or that Biden 'won' more votes than Obama LOL

Gumshoe says, "I can think anything"
--You seem to think that ballot results that are not auditable should be accepted as 'fact.' How interesting...

They were audited. And reinforced that the final results of the 2020 election were ultimately accurate.

Gumshoe says, "They were audited. And reinforced that the final results of the 2020 election were ultimately accurate."
--Nope. Only Arizona carried out an actual audit and found 700k illegal ballots. The rest either claimed to audit but only carried out small samples in clean counties (Georgia) or just recounted the same fraudulent ballots again (Georgia and Maricopa county). Nice try. lol

Don't know or care who you voted for just saying your post was done with some common sense and rational thought applied. I wish more right wingers could ACTUALLY act like they have some common sense and rational thought

At least Oz never drew a gun on a Black man minding how own business.

We care because PA just elected one of the saddest, least qualified candidate possible to represent them. Usually I'd feel sorry if a state goes to crap but PA at this point deserves to be annihilated. Do you think they should have elected him?

No, we should not have.
Fetterman is going to destroy my state :(

Ok how?? I really would love to hear this

Why? Don’t you?