Imgflip Logo Icon

Black guy hiding behind tree

Black guy hiding behind tree | IMGFLIP SILENCING CONSERVATIVES; HOPING THAT ELON MUSK WILL BUY THEM | image tagged in black guy hiding behind tree | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
870 views 48 upvotes Made by Fauscovai 2 years ago in politics
Black guy hiding behind tree memeCaption this Meme
74 Comments
8 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Fauscovai, lmao! They hold my stuff all day (still haven't posted my two from this morning). Anyway, two thumps up and an upvote...:)
6 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Why do they hold submissions up, and then allow them through much later?

It really is an odd characteristic of liberals to find so much pleasure in trying to torment others. And they don't even limit that to Conservatives.
8 ups, 2y,
3 replies
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
I would just be guessing, Serenity, but I think it has to do with my firm belief that liberalism is a mental disorder and they find my memes offensive. A lot of times they don't let them go through & reject them after 25 plus Mod views or more.

When I see so many memes go up in under an hour (or 1 hour or a few) in Politics and they have been holding mine for 8 or 12 hours or longer, it is done on purpose. I attached a meme I made that speaks to your second paragraph, Serenity. It is also one they REFUSED to post in Politics so I posted it in Conservatives. imgflip.com/i/6xw301
4 ups, 2y,
2 replies
Well said, and true.

What I have discovered as interesting is the fact that these social media sites all give the users the option to block that information they find so offensive, and yet they insist on having someone else, a moderator, do it for them.

I think they realize that blocking someone because they can't handle what they are saying is a sign of weakness, and a surrender to the fact that they cannot defend their point of view, but if someone else does it for them, now it's not their fault. This has the added "benefit" of letting them believe that their position is affirmed as being correct, and they can tell themselves that they are not cowering in a bubble-wrapped echo chamber.

Apparently they do not realize that this makes them look like cowards all the more, hiding behind a moderator, and it reveals the moderators to be petty little tyrants who enjoy the control it gives them.

Liberals, in general, are miserable creatures, for the universe and reality do not comport well with their world view. They know this, no matter how loud they yell to the contrary, and so they do everything in their power to remove all reminders of this simple fact. And since they are miserable, they want everyone else to be equally miserable.
6 ups, 2y,
1 reply
We agree and that is why I followed you a few months ago, Serenity. Btw, are you a guy or a girl? Just wondering. Don't tell me you haven't chosen a side yet...😆😜😂

In case you ever wondered what the mods look like... imgflip.com/gif/6vh3sm
5 ups, 2y,
2 replies
I was once a male trapped in a female body, but then I was born, so, let me check . . . yes, I am a man.

Wow! Knowing what gender I am is a lot easier than the libs led me to believe . . .

LOL on the gif, btw.
6 ups, 2y
Laughing Emoji | image tagged in laughing emoji | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Glad you got out safely! Also, grateful your parents decided against abortion. :)
2 ups, 2y
😂
[deleted]
3 ups, 2y,
2 replies
5 ups, 2y,
3 replies
"In other words, you think something about a group of people, so you assume they think the same thing about themselves. That's not very logical."

Galatians 4:16
So have I become your enemy by telling you the truth?
1 up, 2y
You misunderstood Galatians, then.

Paul’s intentions were to convert Galatians to Christianity because it was futile to follow the law of Moses to be right before God.

He was offering them a different path for fundamentalists of his time, and they criticized and persecuted him by telling them facts.

In a way, one could interpret OM as Paul and you the Galatians, as like the Galatians, because you disagree with OM; you cannot accept any facts from them.

So if OM ever stated a fact, you would rather spite the facts than agree with OM.

Your criticisms and generalizations of liberals does kind of put you in the pants of the Galatian. Not Paul.

Surely, you do not seek to convert OM, but seek to ridicule him.

Am I not correct? Then by all means, prove me wrong.
[deleted]
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
1 up, 2y
It’s far worse than that.

In this case, Serenity is the Galatians. Not Paul.

You speak truth, and because of that, you are Serenity’s enemy.
1 up, 2y
That sums up the left pretty well
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Says the person who celebrated people dying from Covid because they had different political views. Sorry you should try to claim compassion as your moral High ground.
[deleted]
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Regardless it Doesn’t change the fact that you aren’t compassionate and can’t claim any moral high ground. I would say laughing at someone’s death is the ultimate insult. So quit pretending your upset by insults when you cast them around quite often. Stupid people do things that kill them all the time. Mocking them is childish and definitely not compassionate.
[deleted]
2 ups, 2y,
2 replies
0 ups, 2y
Like I said not a compassionate person with any moral high ground. The fact you have the ability for compassion but use it selectively for those who agree with you is not a virtue.
0 ups, 2y
Whatever, by your own admission you are only selectively compassionate and freely insult the dead who committed no offense against you other than disagreeing with your politics.
[deleted]
4 ups, 2y
Meanwhile Matt Walsh teaches us that young girls are most breedable at 16.
[deleted]
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
9 ups, 2y,
2 replies
Common sense has left the building with libs these days. A man I wouldn't trust with our grandkids is supposedly running our country. I haven't heard libs complaining that he is nuttier than a fruitcake cuz they most likely are, too, so there you go. The unacceptable is acceptable.

Kill a full-term baby? No problem. I call it infanticide.
Open borders, crime and drugs? The more the merrier and let's abolish police while we're at it.
Drag shows, bars and lewd books for innocent children? And why not 'choose' your sex? Makes sense to the mentally disordered, not to rational people, Octavia.
[deleted]
5 ups, 2y,
1 reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
5 ups, 2y
"I would say the same thing about many conservatives"

But, given that it has already been established that you lack common sense, you are ill-equipped to come to a right determination on the matter. I realize you are the one who thinks that simply declaring your opinion makes it so, but that is just another example of a lack of common sense.

"Would you trust Donald Trump with your grandkids? I wouldn't."

Given the preceding sentence, this sounds like election denying. Good for you! Trump DID actually win, and v's grandchildren were far more safe when Trump was in office than now. It's cute how you think a little online repartee makes the pedophile leanings of Biden go away. It is not surprising that you attempt to minimize child rape and abuse.

"Would you trust Donald Trump with your grandkids? I wouldn't."

You say it every time you defend the Democrat Party. You make it happen every time you vote for a Democrat. It is interesting to see the disconnect you have between your actions and what you think you believe. Obviously, you did not learn about consequences growing up. Hence- LIBERAL.

"What "lewd books"?"

Check out some other news sources other than the liberal dominated ones, and you will learn of this.

"Again, you're not using that term accurately"

Says the man, or woman pretending to be a man, who says that men can get pregnant.
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Oh I see now why I get banned, IMGFLIP, marketing strategy!
3 ups, 2y
They don't like you cuz you are great at throwing nukes and truth bombs at the enemy! It's OK, we thank you for your service...
5 ups, 2y
That's funny and sad.
5 ups, 2y
[deleted]
2 ups, 2y
LUL God one +1
3 ups, 2y
Bro this website is the most conservative place on the internet lol what you mean?
[deleted]
5 ups, 2y,
3 replies
If by "silencing conservatives" you mean keeping shit like this off the platform, then I'm all for it.
0 ups, 2y
People really trying to put themselves out in the world.
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 2y
Are you sure? Because conservatives have always been allowed to use Twitter well before Elon took over. Yet every conservative has been elated about "free speech finally being back on the platform" when these f**kers started mouthing off.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
"If by "silencing conservatives" you mean keeping shit like this off the platform, then I'm all for it."

Why call those on your side, "conservatives"? Obviously, that right there's a Democrat/progressive.
[deleted]
2 ups, 2y,
2 replies
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y
1 up, 2y
L
[deleted]
4 ups, 2y
After looking at the politicstoo tab, he would just shut it down saying society doesn’t need that shit
0 ups, 2y
Maybe because it’s a site for memes and not borderline SHlT political people ruining the memes???

But hey, that’s just my theory! :)
[deleted]
1 up, 2y
Wouldn't be surprising! lol
4 ups, 2y
1 up, 2y
[deleted]
9 ups, 2y,
3 replies
Well, you've been wrong about everything else, so you might as well continue that trend.
[deleted]
5 ups, 2y
He’s the only batter still hitting 1.000
4 ups, 2y
[deleted]
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Have I though?
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Comments disabled, on your thesis about fascism? The only thing worse than censorship, is disabling the comment section!
Are you afraid? Or are you fascist?
[deleted]
3 ups, 2y,
2 replies
Hahahahahahahahaha

No. Me setting the comments to disabled is not worse than actively pulling your published materials. That's nonsense and if you think that makes me fascist then read the meme again - that's exactly why I put it there.
[deleted]
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 2y
4 ups, 2y,
2 replies
Pulling your own published material is not censorship. Censorship is when someone else does. If you want to have a debate, that's fine, but I've already won. Instead of creating false narratives? How about you defend yourself and begin with "disabling the comment section is not worse than censorship, because _____." And fill in the blank. 1) I am I right. 2) You can't prove me wrong. Instead, you would have me to believe that deleting my own content is worse than disabling comments and that statement is not only false! It takes the focus off what I said.
4 ups, 2y
1) I am right.* { I am I right is not what meant. }
[deleted]
3 ups, 2y,
2 replies
Disabling the comment section is not worse than censorship, because you are still typing comments which means it's still a thing you're allowed to do.
6 ups, 2y,
1 reply
If I was keeping score, you would be in the negatives.
5 ups, 2y,
5 replies
What is so missing in the imgflip liberals' lives that you all point to your "accomplishments" on a meme website?

Some other loser was bragging about how he or she has been on imgflip longer than me, not realizing, perhaps, that the particular account I was on might not be the original one. And now here you are, "LoOk aT mY imGFLip ScOrE!!!"

This is just great! Now I am going to have to fill out ANOTHER nomination form for the Nobel Peace Prize. If one of you "brilliant" imgflippers wins, I expect a cut of the money award!!!
4 ups, 2y
Right!
3 ups, 2y
He got the points from publishing MLP meme templates
[deleted]
3 ups, 2y
Well, we're not missing a scorekeeper if that's why you're offering yourself as one.
0 ups, 2y
@Gumshoe (This comment is for Gumshoe)
I was talking about debate points, not imgflip points. Not sorry.
1 up, 2y
Your comment would have meaning if a supposedly conservative poster had not brought up the scoring first.

Antithesis wasn’t bragging but stating a fact.

Sorry that hurt your feelings.
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
This is not your post. This is Fauscovai's post, I am able to comment, because he didn't disable comments. This is your post.
[deleted]
4 ups, 2y,
2 replies
....yes, correct.

What exactly do you think censorship actually is? Because you can't force me to be the host of your comments. That's authoritarian all in and of itself. That's nothing to do with censorship, that's you not being important enough to control what I do.
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Oh, and disabling comments IS both cowardly, and censorious. Because you lack good moral character, you cannot see this.

But we are here to help you!

Just remember- admitting you have a problem is the first step on the road to recovery.
[deleted]
3 ups, 2y
No, the reason I can't see it is because you're still sending me your unedited writing freely.

How can I see censorship if there's nothing stopping you from sending me your miserably terrible writing?
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
I can't believe you tried to say that because I can comment on someone else's post, that means disabling comments isn't censorship. That's so weak.
[deleted]
3 ups, 2y
It's not! I don't think you know what censorship even means. You can't bully me into hosting your writing - that's just not how this works!
Black guy hiding behind tree memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
IMGFLIP SILENCING CONSERVATIVES; HOPING THAT ELON MUSK WILL BUY THEM