Really????

Lol...I was waiting for someone to post on this ridiculous and absurd character from Canada. This is a perfect and primary example that proves this nonsense will stop at nothing and there are no boundaries.

So true!

they will have major back problems in the future

No, it actually won't. At least not from those fake tits. Those are lightweight prosthetics that can be removed at will. This person is a distraction and has no business being around kids.

that is quite true, i wouldnt want my kid around that

There is way more than enough of that already.

Don't they get in the way ?

If those were real, I'm not sure if I'd care...

Plot twist:
They're actually made of wood.
:P

Terrifying idea lol

Question: had a woman come in with large boobs and tight-fitting clothing, would she not have been written up? Or are the rules completely different nowadays?

This is not gender identity 6u2scn.jpg (click to show)

Even if it was an original, it'd be too much for the Boobs Stream.

Lol
Maybe a boobs+ stream?

The Fonz - 64qqc1.jpg (click to show) - Upvote for you!

Great, Libs of Tik Tok finally managed to find an actual example of inappropriate teacher behavior that isn't just existing while queer in the presence of children.

Shop class, nonetheless! Just wait until some power equipment catches one of those!

"Finally"?

Oh, no. LOTT has been exposing inappropriate teacher behavior for quite a while now.

As well as just stupid leftist antics in general...

And promoting stochastic terrorist threats against children’s hospitals, let’s not forget about that.

Childrens hospitals who mutilate children

Children aren't getting SRS.

They most certainly are

https://www.californiafamily.org/2022/08/california-hospitals-found-to-be-performing-transition-surgeries-on-minors/

https://dailycaller.com/2022/08/18/doctors-performing-sex-change-surgeries-children-minors-transgender-boston-childrens-hospital/

You say that like it's a bad thing.

It's not.

I'm not saying its a bad thing, I'm just stating a matter of fact.

in context, you are construing it as if it is a bad thing. Really, one might even interpret your comments as saying that all who oppose "gender affirming" surgeries for children are "stochastic terrorists."

Stop with the semantics. We all know what you're getting at. If it's such a good position you have, why not defend it instead of weaseling out?

"stochastic terrorist threats"

Yes. That's EXACTLY what LOTT exposes. Good job!