Now, THAT’s Patriotism. To make a Point, on the One Day that signifies America’s Freedom

Look up Treason in America by Anton Chaitkin. Some shocking stuff that was done to the US right from the start.

Funny how theres no lefties in the comments saying this is conservative BS, lol.

Now I do think a lot of them are changing their mind. I seen a bunch of them deleting their 1~2 years old post where they are praising how good Biden is. Specially OM.

Hahahahahahahahaha

When have you EVER had your finger on the pulse of what Octavia Melody is thinking?

I mean, you've kind of done some promotion work for them without thinking it through 🤷‍♀️

Their emotions are too much right now. They need some tea and some loving anal rape, to calm down.

https://youtu.be/U4dSIZ5QS7I

Where did you find this? This is terrible. Some group actually organized this horrific event?
Thank you for posting.

Happened in Arizona

Yes, sadly there are stupid americans, that have no connection to real history

Wow many countries have these God Given Freedoms, to say what you want and not be killed, imprisoned?

Hey let's go to Iran and speak out against the government. NK? Russia? Cha cha China?

In my country, Cuba, they would kill you right on the spot. Make a good example in front of everyone.

What the hell is wrong with these people? Can't we just send them to a communist country?

They are so disgusting not even communist countries will take them.

Uhh, that they don't toss gays from rooftops, like some muslims?

Yet another lib trying to police speech. Meanwhile you went from communism to christianity lolol is your little dog going to show up now?

I don't know, what does that say about anybody?

what does it say about you that you gutlessly post others posts behind their back?

Are you trying to insinuate that communists countries are bad, and moving to those countries would be a punishment to the individual? Is okay, whatever answer you give me now, you will delete 6 months later.

it is illegal, just like silencing people who do not agree with you. But there should be accountability for people's actions, and there should be acknowledgement that people can be domestic terrorists and domestic enemies. Domestic enemies and terrorists should be dealt with accordingly. Also, people who go claiming that they are going to move out of the country when they throw their tantrum when things do not go their way, they are free to leave and encouraged to, no one is pointing a gun at them preventing them to do so. And yes, communist countries are shit holes no one like to live in, I highly recommend anyone to go there, would be a good learning experience.

No, not people. Domestic Enemies who openly state their hatred for America and dreams of her destruction. Criticism and outright active actions to destabilize the country is seditious.

You mean can you forcibly murder little babies you don't like? No, that's illegal.

You mean the people who come Illegally, jump the line in front of people coming to America the correct way?

Can Joe Biden bake you a fresh meat pie?

Can you as a uniquely qualified atheist and fan of Matt Dillahunty demonstrate (Matt loves that word that you keep parroting from him) that a demonstration is the sole epistemology by which knowledge is acquired on any given topic?

Engaging in psychological suppression is you, by definition, suppressing your own thoughts. So in addition to this assumption and your behavior not aligning with your claims. Yes, I *can potentially* know your thoughts better than you.

To claim that atheists being notoriously guilty of psychological suppression would necessitate most 'Christians' raising that issue all the time is a non-sequitur. Especially when considering the fact that even Christian sources will acknowledge that most who self-identify as 'Christians' do not meet the defining characteristics necessary to legitimately hold that label.

Most Christians also don't know or understand their bibles or how to engage in apologetics. Do you think all Christians argue like the one's Matt lines up on the Atheist Experience and then hangs up on them all the time?

This is in fact a stream about politics *on a meme site* where people typically come to kid each other with half-truths, exaggerations, and humor - not seriously challenge or establish peer-reviewed papers because they're feeling a little insecure about their atheist complex that day or needing to air past grievances.

Once again, this is a meme site. How do you make a distinction between the exaggeration, half-truths, and humor typically accompanying meme satire and what you call 'error?'

Your responses are in fact out of place when you are offering serious challenges to unserious memes. This is not based on the category of the meme environment in which you find yourself on this site, but rather on your pedantic, anal, and serious responses to their casual and humorous ones.

If they verbally abuse someone, they aren't Christians because they don't follow what Christ taught us. They're doing the opposite. A Christian is a Christ follower by definition.

I never said I decided who is a Christian. You tell they aren't Christians by A) They shouldn't be abusing people but B) The Bible says you will tell by the Fruits of the Spirit. Nowhere does the fruit of the spirit say to abuse people emotionally and verbally.

If Christians act like everyone else, you couldn't even tell they were Christian. Christians don't party or get drunk, they don't have sex with anyone else except their husband or wife, they don't swear or talk bad about others or gossip. They don't cheat or lie to get out of something. We're not called to do that. Now, I'm not saying we NEVER do it because everyone sins and no one is perfect, but unlike everyone else, we are remorseful and repent and ask for forgiveness. God's mercy is endless towards us if we ask for forgiveness and ask him to help us not do it again.

No. I was saying we love our enemies. We don't abuse anyone. You're not a Christian by doing those things, Christians do those things as an act of wanting to please God. Others do it because most people have morals (which God has given everyone that).

We mess up and sometimes we don't do those things, but unlike people who don't think twice about it, we ask for forgiveness and ask God to help us do better.

You never claimed that, but you assumed it. You've done this repeatedly in exchanges in the past & don't seem to comprehend at all why it's problematic for you.

Yes, that's what notoriously means *among those who read & understand the bible* Which is exactly what I stipulated to you.

I'm glad you agree with it, but on what basis? Some atheists know the bible but none understand it. This is never better exhibited than with the common atheist canard that the bible supports slavery or your claim on my other post that the bible contains contradictions & mistakes. Not only does this exhibit a fundamental misunderstanding of the bible, but of linguistics as a general category.

Many who self-identify as Christian argue this way? Or many you're assuming are Christian apart from legitimate qualifiers to establish that? How do you as an atheist determine whether someone is a Christian or not? By mere self-declaration or identity? I know that works for you with gender-confused perverts, but that's not how it works with Christians.

What I mean by the atheist complex is that when you suppress a reality as basic & vital as God, you will suppress other less important realities as well. You demonstrate this on a daily basis with your comments.

Contrary to the outcries & laments of militant atheists everywhere - The term atheism holds implications far beyond the term's definition of "Not theist" We see this no better exhibited than in voting patterns & the ideological views of the Christian right vs. the secular left. This is a generalization for sure, but it's not a hasty one.

You failed to answer or understand the question. I'll try again. How do you make a distinction between the exaggeration, half-truths, & humor typically accompanying meme satire & what you call 'error?'

You say "it should be pointed out and corrected." Do you not see how utterly ridiculous that statement is? You are trying to correct that which is intentionally that way for humor's sake. This is a product of your atheism. This is precisely why leftwing secular "Fact Checkers" ding political satire sites like the Babylon Bee. You are unable to make clear distinctions between reality & fantasy.

Your anal & serious response to a clearly unserious satirical meme rooted in fantasy is done for humorous effect? Please do elaborate on that. I don't think I've witnessed a single humorous post out of you. Are you a modern-day Andy Kaufman? Your comedy is too sophisticated for us to grasp?

Christians don't attack Muslims. They try to offer them something else and let God handle the rest.

Christians don't attack anyone. They try to save people through the Gospel. And they do it in a respectful way. If they just tell you that you're going to hell and nothing else, then they aren't Christians.

In what way? By only saying they'll go to hell and that's it? Their not Christians them.

True Christians don't attack anyone. You seem to be confused on how a true Christian thinks.

A Christian by definition is a Christ follower. Christ followers do not abuse people, especially not verbally or emotionally.

You're talking about "Christians" who just say they're Christian just cause they think so. I know many people who say they're Christian, but act completely different.

They. Aren't. A. Christian.

Christians are called to act differently than the world.

Jesus said that if someone strikes you in the cheek, turn the other. If someone forced you to run a mile, do two miles.

We are called to love our enemies, not abuse them.

Not being Christians or true Christians was the label affixed to people troughout Africa, the Americas, Asia, the Middle East, Pacific and Indian Ocean.... to justify slaughter in the millions, as well as theft, exploitation, and rape,,,

Nope. Being a Christian can be said to have started during the time of Paul. It was used to say that you were a true follower of Christ and you follow the teachings of Jesus the Christ.

Um, that was nearly 2000 years ago, and Paul was an agent of Rome, an anti Christ, representing Son of Jackal who sits in Rome who shall take the Word of the Chosen and call it their own, but not before corrupting it beyond recognition.

I've never heard that one before...

He didn't "invent it" and he's definitely not a fictional character. He started the widespread of Christianity after he himself was a murderer before. But then he was saved.

There is no evidence he existed.

Have you never heard of the Apostles? Simon Peter, who Paul stole the seat from?

I do read the Bible.

According to the Bible, Paul was a Roman citizen who was taught under a Pharisee. He was told to kill Christians, and later on he was saved by God.

Nowhere does it mention Paul being an agent of Rome.

But you just said he was....

Being a citizen of a country doesn't mean you're an agent.

Yeah, I've heard of the Apostles. They mainly preached to the Jews though, so Paul is more recognized for spreading it across the nations.

You really need to read the Bible.
Oh, so you are aware Paul was an agent of Rome.

What? What kind of source are you using for that?

I'm saying you can say Paul started the Christian movement.

No, he didn't. He stole it. And corrupted it.

Unless you're going by him inventing it, or even that he was a fictional character in a fictional story as many maintain, given that there was no independent contemporary mention of Jesus?

History from the Crusades to today says otherwise.

This is a meme site - Not court testimony under oath. Lighten up, take a self-esteem class, and get a life.

I think it does - Especially when considering that's the only part of my reply you latched onto. You seem especially active in the comments today. Did someone kick your ass in debate and now you find it necessary to try and redeem yourself from that? You take yourself and others here too seriously. That's a recipe for eventual high blood pressure - not the fun and entertainment this site is meant for.

Repealing RvW broke their minds. Like Trump did.

Says you, I'm wrong. I don't think you're being honest with me or yourself. I think you're a deeply insecure man and you attempt to remedy that on a site intended for satire and entertainment by trying to beat others here down who are simply here to have a good time because you clearly are not. Maybe you need to grow up?

You continue to post that I'm wrong, but your behavior doesn't appear to align with that claim. You might know better than me what your thoughts are - if you're being intellectually honest - not if you're engaging in what is commonly known in psychology as psychological suppression. e.g.subconciously suppressing insecurity, childhood emotional wounds, and events of the past. etc. My experience tells me of more than 20+ yrs of engaging them - Atheists like yourself are notorious for this.

There is indeed a difference between coming here for entertainment and fun, and coming here to attempt to beat people down in political discussions. You have as of yet to argue why you see yourself as being justified in engaging primarily in the latter rather than the former on a site intended *primarily* for purposes of entertainment and fun.

Your responses to some of these posts are ridiculous and akin to the idiot 'progressives' who protested Dave Chappelle. This is a man engaging in humor and these morons show up to air political grievances as you are here over satire. They and you are clearly carrying a chip on your shoulders and may have potential mental health issues if you can't make that distinction & see why your and their response to it is out of place.

This poster has posted about 20 'No, you're wrong' posts today without substance or credibility. Dems are seething lately that they realized SCOTUS doesn't only work to push their degeneracy.

watch out! the poster probably will repost your joke elsewhere, out of context and to show the usual band of idiots look! we might want to murder babies but look what THEY say. humorless literalist.

The same way you're dishonest about the killing of a life who commited zero crimes not being literal murder because you play semantics.

The consent happened when she spread her legs.

Will be now :)

For anyone seeing this that doesn't get it, now we have humorless lib literalists that are conflating, in this case, a poster posting a meme about a cantankerous old man and him actually wanting to shoot people. This dishonest avenue of attack, on a MEME website, is an attempt to drag people that can meme down to their miserable level. They hardly meme yet won't go to another site like twitter or Facebook or reddit or anywhere else they can bitch and whine, it's because, as of yet, we DO have a certain amount of freedom to meme, which infuriates them. Laugh at the literalists when they attempt this cheap trick.

Hopefully it won't be posted on another stream behind ur back 'proving' how you and 'MAGATS' want to shoot people but I wouldn't bet on it.