The CDC Director Rochelle Walensky

And 7 or 9 polio vaccines were pulled from the shelves the moment something bad happened before Salk got it right.

Maybe it had something to do with medical ethics at that time, instead of most approving it holding vaccine company stocks in their portfolio.

Absolutely true. Interesting how leftists, liberals, or dems enter the picture, ethics and morals exit the picture at around the same time.

Ah, more of those who don't like the truth. You are absolutely right about that.

"They let you grab them by the..." get the quote right.

Makes me think that the “gay gene” liberals always talk about is real, and that they found a way to inject it into our kids.

Naw, that's the sin nature we all got. Only one cure for that - Jesus Christ.

Jesus is dead and he can't cure anything. And the Bible doesn't even say he "cures" the "sin nature"

imitation is the most sincere form of flattery. so i thank you.

Well, being I was the first to say it was injected, you are imitating me. So, thank you for thanking me.

Quite the large 'beak' on that one

The Phase 1/2/3 trial initially enrolled up to 4,500 children ages 6 months to under 12 years of age in the United States, Finland, Poland, and Spain from more than 90 clinical trial sites. Additional children have been enrolled in all age groups following study amendments and the trial currently includes more than 10,000 children.

https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-announce-data-demonstrating-high-immune

They dropped most of them from the results because they got sick. Please study up.

Thank you for making my point. Do you own Phizer stock too? Because many of those on the CDC board that did approve it do, as well as many of our elected officials.

Thank you for visiting.

Your point? that 3 people were used in tests? You do understand that 10,000+ is a much larger number than 3 right?

They sure are eager to damage kids.

If only it were about the kids, considering there are now ways to treat Covid. I personally think it's all about the money. If you just look at how many on the CDC board that approves these vaccines hold stock in vaccine companies.

You know George Washington warned us about political parties, not to have them as they are destructive, that said, party or no.... lock em all up, or at least kick em out of congress.

https://www.businessinsider.com/congress-stock-act-violations-senate-house-trading-2021-9

F A C T

Thank you for your support.

However, the COVID vaccine was needed more urgently.

Literally 15 seconds on a Google search proves this laughably wrong.

That's your problem, you should use a search engine instead of Google.

So, Lokiare, you should know by now that I drill down to the actual studies and read them.

Look up how Google broke their algorithm to censor things.

You missed the part where I found the study. Read it. And discovered the OP was wrong.

I suggest you do the same. Use a search engine of your choice. Look for the under 5 covid vaccine study. Read the abstract (the summary) so you can see how wrong they are.

I did. They dropped 3/4 of the participants without giving a reason, and counted slight cold symptoms as severe covid. If you read the study you would know that.

I did read the study. I don't know what you read. It wasn't the study. Because it has things like this in it: For participants 2 through 5 years of age, approximately 3,000 received the vaccine and approximately 1,000 received a placebo; approximately 2,200 vaccine recipients were followed for safety for at least two months following the second dose.

Why do you do this? Honestly. Why?

You're either parroting nonsense you've been told and believe or you're just making it up for whatever reason.

Why?

Try reading the study, not a CNN article based on the study. The actual study says what I said above. Do your own research.

Ugh. PAY ATTENTION.

I read the study. Thousands of children were involved.

Not 3.

Thousands.

"Here are some red flags about this link you've provided:

1) he links to the same site several times but claiming different things about the link.
You can verify this by clicking through to read the source.

2) he makes some claims about the cdc lying, but doesn't offer any data to show that.

This guy is a whacko."

1) lol no. Please try logic and reason.

2) The CDC is a known liar now, but sure ask for sources in the comments.

"So, 1) this was from 2019 and for kids older than 5."

Yes, not the same study, but about the same vaccines.

"2) there were 4,000 per age group. (not the 3 kids the op insists on)."

Keep reading and see how they divided them up and how many they disqualified early.

"3) Where did you read they "waited" 84 days? They reported at regular intervals, the longest being 54 days."

You gotta read the whole thing. They didn't report for the first few weeks, then reported 84 days later.

"4) where did you get this nonsense about 300+ of the group took vaccines outside of the study? The only ones who would do that would be the placebo group- AFTER the study was completed because they should get the vaccine."

You gotta read. They state it plainly in the page I linked.

"Gonna repeat my question: why do you do this?

You are either repeating things you were told (but won't go verify) or you're deliberately lying.

Which one is it?"

No, I read the study. Please do the same and then apologize for your lies.

https://thenevadaglobe.com/articles/cdc-used-flawed-data-to-approve-covid-child-vaccines/

Here are some red flags about this link you've provided:

1) he links to the same site several times but claiming different things about the link.
You can verify this by clicking through to read the source.

2) he makes some claims about the cdc lying, but doesn't offer any data to show that.

This guy is a whacko.

Yes, thousands which over half were then "disqualified" without explanation.

Dude. Do math instead of sticking to your faulty assumptions.

3000 kids. 1000 we're given a placebo. 2000 given the vaccine.

2000 kids were tracked BECAUSE YOU DON'T NEED TO FOLLOW THE PLACEBO KIDS. THEY DIDN'T GET THE VACCINE.

SO. No. Kids were not "dropped for no reason." When they didn't get the vaccine, you don't have to follow them to track side effects.

They won't have any.

In this study https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2203315 they waited 84 days after the vaccine injection to log any results.
300+ of the placebo group took vaccines outside the study.
These studies are basically garbage.

So, 1) this was from 2019 and for kids older than 5.
2) there were 4,000 per age group. (not the 3 kids the op insists on).
3) Where did you read they "waited" 84 days? They reported at regular intervals, the longest being 54 days.

4) where did you get this nonsense about 300+ of the group took vaccines outside of the study? The only ones who would do that would be the placebo group- AFTER the study was completed because they should get the vaccine.

Gonna repeat my question: why do you do this?

You are either repeating things you were told (but won't go verify) or you're deliberately lying.

Which one is it?

Thats like saying you should drive a Chevy instead of a Ford to Wallmart or a Toyota, or whatever.

No, Google is like a public bus that only goes to Costco no matter what you tell them

And what is this magical search engine that you use Iokiare where you get the supposedly correct information that strawman all leftists as devils and praises all rightists are good little angels??!

I currently use the new brave search engine.

at least shes better than trump, who legit told people to "drink bleach..."

Fake news. Why you gotta lie like that? Trump asked a doctor if we could come up with some kind of disinfectant for the blood like bleach. Not being a doctor that's the kind of question that would be asked by anyone.

https://www.nbcboston.com/news/national-international/trump-says-he-knows-better-than-experts-in-many-cases-i-do/2197306/

Unfortunately many people know better than the experts. The experts take their cues from people like Fauci.

Not being a doctor? lol... if he could at least move up from complete idiot.

Trump on coronavirus: 'People are really surprised I understand this stuff'

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-51761880

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicholasreimann/2020/08/24/some-americans-are-tragically-still-drinking-bleach-as-a-coronavirus-cure/?sh=73103db56748

no, i distinctively remember that he said to drink bleach, my colleagues remembered dat too

Nope. I watched it live. He never said drink bleach. You are either lying or have a really bad memory.

ye its probably the second option (dont expect me to like it coming on politics, cuz then everything you think you understand is flipped upside down and turned 180 degrees)