Just gonna drop this here

Nope, but he's forcing Twitter to reveal all kinds of stuff like the 50% bots.

Read between the lines any?
He's 'forcing' himself to not buy Twitter because he was gonna end up losing a heaping ton of cash on it, plus everything else he had as his 15 came to a belated end. Was gonna be hard to break even, let alone turn a profit, which would in turn causes it to lose value and before you know it, math rears its ugly head and investors ditch it. Plus that personally overseeing the search for bots bit was gonna be a tad more time consuming than he anticipated. Investing that much in what could become a toxic asset overnight is not how he got rich.

Yeah, twitter is too big to fail. Managed correctly, Musk could double his money.

Yeah, AOL or Yahoo anyone? How's that Instagram going lately? Facebook is now Meta, let's see that slow its downwhirl spiral,,,

They're all passing fads, and Tweetering will be as big a joke as the rest of them in a few years. In fact, ironically, Elon may have accelerated its eventual demise, something I doubt he's unaware of.

Huh, that's why he's owner of the company. :l

He only just put in an offer as they negotiate. He won't have any control for awhile.

He legally has bought it though...

no

Yes, he has. Which is why he owns Twitter. Is this not simple enough logic for you?

still no

*not an argument*

Correct.
Argument about what?

:l

Is he? Quotes, context, etc.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thestreet.com/.amp/technology/elon-musk-chooses-sides-on-gun-control-debate

https://mobile.twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1529730751964532736?lang=en

Thanks for the links btw

LOL

“I strongly believe that the right to bear arms is an important safeguard against potential tyranny of government. Historically, maintaining their power over the people is why those in power did not allow public ownership of guns,” Musk told CNBC on May 25.

Yeah, he was talking about (from the second link) "To be more precise, I mean any semi-automatic gun with supersonic ammo and a large magazine."

He doesn't even know how guns work. Every gun can shoot a supersonic round, because rounds that are supersonic, go faster than the speed of sound. You can either modify your gun, or buy rounds with enough powder in cylinder to shoot "supersonic."

Virginia Tech shooting was done with pistols and lots of standard mags. Columbine was hunting rifles, shotguns, and a rifle that shot pistol ammo.

You’re welcome. Still he’s still strict on gun control.

Still, if this is the new face of conservatives, picking clean former liberals like Musk and Trump who would restrict gun access at the drop of a tragedy, maybe conservatives ought to rethink whom they support. Or what they stand for.

He doesn't seem to be, actually.

"strongly believe that the right of to bear arms is an important safeguard..." you know the rest.