TRUTH

There's teachers, staff and security personnel that could/should be armed. (All schools have security personnel now. It's inexcusable that they aren't armed)

They cant be trusted to not be molesting your children.....

Wouldn’t the fear of your children being molested simply mean we should rid this country of public schools all together?

Its a local problem. Try having a competent board, and administration running the schools....

Or just do private school and homeschool.

Not all larents can wother afford private school, or are competent to educate their own children. They still have to pass state standards.

Well, if we weren’t sending $40 billion to the Ukraine, paying for drug addicts to have clean needles, and donating millions of vaccines to foreign countries, maybe the government could have vouchers systems in the 50% of states who don’t.

Your fix is to throw more money at a system that is already failing in your eyes? Sounds familiar!

Well, no. Vouchers would be allowing parents to spend the funds used for their children’s education towards the private school of their choice instead of he school district using that money. Meaning if you’re Catholic you could send your kid to the Catholic school, you’re Muslim you can send the kid to the Muslim school, you’re Methodist you can send your kid to the Methodist school, etc. Rather than sending children to public schools where the parents barely get to know the teachers, the parents have no clue what you’re teaching their kids, and the kids are learning about Egyptian gods and Chinese zodiac before they’ve learned about their own religion.

-Actually it's just re-allocating money already budgeted for students.
-Vouchers actually cost less per student than what get's spent per student at public schools (because government entities are notoriously ineffecient)
-in places where they are available, Vouchers have been extremely effective

4th graders are not capable of defending themselves. Adults are, both mentally and physically. Giving them expert training and protection is obviously the idea. Not giving that to 4th graders who barely know what division is.

Read the OP....

IM ON YOUR SIDE.

Well, I mean, it seems lke what your saying is: giving weapons to 4th graders?

A 4th grade class should be a defenseless group, for Gods sake.

A single teacher is responsible for this, as someone PROPPED OPEN AN EXTERNAL DOOR.

Door locks keep people honest. If you want in, you will still get, that is not rhe point of a door lock.

Anyway, a class of children should be defenseless, as they are there to learn, not to train in combat.

Okay.

I would tell your little shit heads to stop bullying...

Probably a lot more fun and useful than gender theory, or rando leftist conspiracy theories(i.e CRT).

Smart idea? Probably not. Smarter than the theory that men give birth? Yes. Smarter than the theory that every organization including black owned organizations are all discriminatory towards black people? Yes.

I literally said it wasn’t a smart idea. I just said that ya’ll are trying to teach children even less intelligent things than that.

Yes, I hear you don't like teaching history, it's stupid. Especially when it's how you treated people who weren't European. You don't wanna teach that, its embarassing.

All of my ancestors immigrated to America in the early 20th Century, including German immigrants not so long before WW2.(So you can probably guess that they’d be discriminated against). Plus, just ‘cause you heard something doesn’t make it true. I’m fine with teaching history, though I’m not fine with teaching critical race theory.
You’re pretty racist because #1. Just ‘cause I have certain political beliefs you immediately assumed I was white. #2. You immediately assumed just because I was white I couldn’t have come from immigrants after slavery. Now it is true that I’m indeed white, but that doesn’t matter. It’s pretty much the same as saying “All criminals are black” it’s true that there’s a higher crime rate among black people, but that doesn’t mean all criminals are black. So that’s no different than saying “All right-wing people are white” it’s true that there’s a higher amount that are white, but that doesn’t make them all white. Probably like 99% of Democrats you think of black conservatives as traitors, or fake black people.
Now to get to the point of my ancestors immigrating after slavery was abolished, you said “when it's how YOU treated people who weren't European”. First off, how did I treat people who weren’t European badly 200 years ago if I haven’t been alive for 20 years. Second, how could my ancestors treat non European people badly in America if they weren’t even in America?

Now my one problem with teaching history is that it’s too easy to bring political bias into, so that’s really the only flaw.

My grandfather fought the germans in WWII, then spent 40 years selling them John Deere equipment for 40 yrs. So, whatever.

And obviously you still don't understand crt. History. How people came to America or were already here and how they were treated. I'm not too proud how we treated the Aboriginals or the Dukabors or the Japanese here in Canada, but it is what it is and we work to rebuild relations and not repeat. History aint pretty, but it happened.

I understand CRT perfectly. It’s literally by definition a conspiracy theory. It’s in the name Critical Race THEORY. It’s a theory that society as a whole is conspiring against everyone who is of non European decent. My great grandfather was German and fought the Germans in WW2.