Rats In A Cage

Upvoted

I bet he's thinking When will Durham get me into witness protection?

VERY nice work

Do it Bill. Do it!

Bill has been looking terrible these days. Looks very sickly.

He should, because he's really old... being four years younger than Dementia Brandon.

read that wrong the first time, I read EAT her out

And now I'm going to throw up 🤢

Yep

I think they got so much dirt on each other that in turn involves dirt with others as well, that they're just keeping it shut for the benefit of both of them.

Thanks, Bonzo McReagan you piece of shit!!, for destroying American unions and killing the classic grasroots funding of the Democratic Party, de facto turning it into the DNC, bluecheck fundraising f**kfest we all know and love to hate today.

If it wasn't for the not so few but still few good people in that party, I'd too call them DemocRats.

Pffft, democrats destroyed the unions, they turned their back on the working man and did nothing to help the unions. They lost the police and fire unions as well this year. Turns out calling people names like racist and deplorable makes them not vote for you Hillary. The big FU made her and Democratic Party Elite cry and bent on sabotaging the legitimate president.

"Pffft, democrats destroyed the unions, they turned their back on the working man and did nothing to help the unions"
Nice one, if you keep it like this, your IQ will finally reach negative numbers. Seriously tho, anybody who knows the first thing about the history of union busting in America knows how inhumanly wrong you are.

Anybody looking at the history of union busting since the Industrial Revolution to today, knows that it's Repub

"Turns out calling people names like racist and deplorable makes them not vote for you Hillary. The big FU made her and Democratic Party Elite cry and bent on sabotaging the legitimate president."

So, you're telling me something about someone it's pretty clear by the very post you're replying to, that I don't like very much at al, yeah. Can you sound more like a toxic campaign add?

"The big FU made her and Democratic Party Elite cry and bent on sabotaging the legitimate president."

Exactly, Bernie was the legitimate president and the DINOS at the DNC, whom are more Republicans than some Republicans (Everytime you criticize something that the DNC does worse than the GOP, it's because the DNC is behaving like the GOP [everybody knows the POTUS is actually a Republican and he's name is also Joe..., Joe Manchin])

I understand your own country's politics, history and culture better than you'll ever do, why? because being born somewhere doesn't make you an expert nor a patriot.

I'm more American than half the Politics Stream put together, and the more y'all mald about it, the truer it becomes.

Each screech is an argument in my favor XD

So what you're saying is, Reagan gets the credit for the utter fcuktard show the demotard party has become today?

Well hot damn! First he took down the Soviet Union (aka evil empire #1) and then he took down the demotard party! (aka evil empire #2)

And just when I didn't think I could admire the man any more than I already do! Thanks!

63i8mi.jpg (click to show)

Bonzo's Buddy Ronny took down WHAT?
How'd he do that?

The only thing he took down - other than the massive behemoth of the Grenada wehrmacht which so threatened us over here - was ghettos into the jaws of the Crack Epidemic.

Oh, and the Twin Towers, by hiring bin Laden to create and fund al Queda, providing them CIA training as well which they utilized on 9/1/01.

Pat attention here modda. It's according to granudisimo, that Reagan took down the demotard party. Try to keep up, will ya?

So save your inane observations for granudisimo.

How many times just tonight to me alone do you seem to have difficulty following the discussion chain?

"Pat attention here modda. It's according to granudisimo, that Reagan took down the demotard party. Try to keep up, will ya?"

Why don't you pay attention to deez nuts?

Reagan systematically gutted and busted the union grasroots funding of the party, turning it into a Republican Party lite, turning it into a strawman of itself, meaning Reagan even foresaw this very moment, in a sense.

He didn't take down the Democratic party (keep it up with the ableisms, I guess you were still under the effect of that "sheer giddiness feeling", getting high on your own farts), he took down whatever mainstream leftist and progressive elements he could put his dirty, ape paws on, just like fascists do.

Reagan was a straight up fascist, it's a fact, not an opinion sold with a slick face, he's the closest thing irl that we have to the Antichrist prophecy XD.

"So save your inane observations for granudisimo."

Lol, Nice try, but calling something "inane" doesn't excuse you for not being able to keep up with the conversation and the topics being discussed in it.

Unless you're doing it on purpose, in which case the F in your nickname stands for more than just Fat.

"So what you're saying is, Reagan gets the credit for the utter fcuktard show the demotard party has become today?
Well hot damn! First he took down the Soviet Union (aka evil empire #1) and then he took down the demotard party! (aka evil empire #2)"

So, you openly admit that you're more intolerant about grasroot Democrats (you've called them evil empire #2 in the context of Reagan "destroying" an slightly more evil empire than his own) than I am about Republicans whom aren't consumed by the Amerobrain worms

I wonder which post will get deleted, me calling you a fascist (oops, guess I just did that) pointing out the reality of what you are?, or you using two ableist terms to cement your empty reactionary approach to?

So the Democrat party is now a "f**ktard show" (I used the term f**kfest, and at least have the balls to say f**k and embrace the comic relief of selective letter censorsing, instead of pansying around it by saying "fcuk" right before an ebleism XD) but then it was the evil empire.

I guess you only want two parties that look even more the same? or you prefer to have both a fascist Republican party and a Soviet Democrat party (Oh, yeah right, Democrats have always been soviet stalinist marxist communists right after the great ideological switch, or maybe since the beginning of time, librul owned.

My comment referring to the demotard party as an evil empire will have to chalked up to the sheer giddiness I was feeling at the notion that Reagan took them down, in your opinion.

So I'll own up to calling them that being an exaggeration. But calling them an utter fcuktard show is spot on. I'll stand by that one.

And there it is... playing the fascist card. When they have nothing to actually criticize you for, no intellectual capacity to make their argument stand on its merits, that's what they pull out. Glad to see don't disappoint!

Regarding my use of the word fcuk or variations of it, I prefer to avoid censorship, as I find it abhorrent. If you want to enable it, go right ahead. I absolutely do not care what you post.

And btw, I'm not a republican. Never have been. I won't defend them in anything other than the broadest sense regarding vaguely fiscal subjects. And even that, I'm not particularly comfortable with.

What? You jumped to the wrong conclusion about my political affiliation because I called the demotard party an utter fcuktard show?

You really should know better.

"My comment referring to the demotard party as an evil empire will have to chalked up to the sheer giddiness I was feeling at the notion that Reagan took them down, in your opinion.

So I'll own up to calling them that being an exaggeration. But calling them an utter fcuktard show is spot on. I'll stand by that one."

Now tell me what do you think of unions.

Tell me about countries that don't even need minimum wage laws because unions already signed those kinds of protection into law.

"And there it is... playing the fascist card. When they have nothing to actually criticize you for, no intellectual capacity to make their argument stand on its merits, that's what they pull out. Glad to see don't disappoint!"

When they got nothing to actually criticize you? read the very post you're replying to, because...

"What? You jumped to the wrong conclusion about my political affiliation because I called the demotard party an utter fcuktard show? "

...I did a lot more, than just say you used ableism, to explain the "fascist card" and the fact you're cherry picking my post it's only a further confirmation that I'm correct in my analysis.

Then again, you're American, meaning you're indoctrinated since day one, even by the "liberal" Hollywood movie industry, into having strong far right biases so, I'm not saying you're a fascist (I own to the fact that calling you one was an exaggeration as well) but you're certainly arguing like one.

About your meme history I can't judge because tho your memes attacking the DINOcrat party are too visceral aaaaand there it is, I replied to your ridiculous attempt at redefining how basic dictionary edition works XD.

"Regarding my use of the word fcuk or variations of it, I prefer to avoid censorship, as I find it abhorrent. If you want to enable it, go right ahead. I absolutely do not care what you post.

And btw, I'm not a republican. Never have been. I won't defend them in anything other than the broadest sense regarding vaguely fiscal subjects. And even that, I'm not particularly comfortable with."

I'm comfortable with it because it's just a couple asterisks, imgflip is not my website and thus not my rules, and it's better than the Youtube bot, which lets me say lots of swear words, but then deletes entire posts, sometimes at random because it's AI glitched and thought it was spam or something.

If you feel so uncomfortable by a couple asterisks, then sorry but you're a Grade A Snowflake.

The reasons you admire Reagan are the reasons I know why you're the same kind of psychopath as he is.

You're on the wrong side of history, history that it unfolding before our very eyes.

No Pasarás

Now you're two for two in terms of jumping to the wrong conclusions about me.

You have zero idea of why I admire Reagan. Absolutely zero, and your post proves it.

I guess I would have to admit though, that having you explain history to me is quite an amusing thing. Hold on, I'm gonna go get a beer so I can really relax and enjoy your next post, with your next wrong conclusion about me

Lol You're not fooling anyone.

"
Don't you have the balls, the intellect, or the maturity to come at me in an issues based manner?

Of course not."

I have the balls to come at more than 5 of you chuds at a time, and you've been already rekt in the issues department, so Modda's basically having some fun, while also addressing issues.

Come on buddy, explain to me, on a per issue basis, why you admire Reagan so much?

Or a better question yet, what's even admirable in that piece of shit that pushed the most powerful nation on Earth down the path of neofeudalism.

If the USA is a "Third world country with a Gucci belt" it's because of Reagan.

_First Potus to put the national debt in the trillions while overstating the importance of debt, which is none since money is made up, and Japan has one of the healthiest economies in the world despite its national debt which is at a 300% of is GDP).

He didn't take down the Democrat Party, he indirectly but willfully, reformed it to be stronger than it was before but also, closer to his ideology, moving the American Overton Window so much to the right, that there's enough people with combined voting power, who believe it when someone calls "Biden" a communist XD (if Biden's a communist then Eisenhower and his tax rate to the top earners, was like 10 Stalins combined).

You should be ashamed that a Spaniard has to come and teach you your own country's history.

Heck, from what I'm reading, I could teach you your own go***mned language.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reagan_administration_scandals

"I have the balls to come at more than 5 of you chuds at a time, and you've been already rekt in the issues department, so Modda's basically having some fun, while also addressing issues.

Then do it. But you don't. Why is that? It looks like name calling is all you've got.

"Come on buddy, explain to me, on a per issue basis, why you admire Reagan so much?"

1. I'm not your buddy. 2. But wait.... I thought you made it clear you already knew? So why are you asking me to explain it to you?

"Or a better question yet, what's even admirable in that piece of shit that pushed the most powerful nation on Earth down the path of neofeudalism."

Since you have that opinion, it's pretty clear we're going to have to agree to disagree. So far, history has judged me to be correct, but of course history's judgment may change.

"He didn't take down the Democrat Party..."

So here's what you posted: "Thanks, Bonzo McReagan you piece of shit!!, for destroying American unions and killing the classic grasroots funding of the Democratic Party, de facto turning it into the DNC, bluecheck fundraising f**kfest we all know and love to hate today."

I'll go ahead and stipulate this one to you, but just on a technicality. If anyone can say Reagan did all that to the demotard party, and also claim he didn't take it down, then good on you. Nobody will buy it, but go for it anyway.

"He didn't take down the Democrat Party, he indirectly but willfully, reformed it to be stronger than it was before..."

Okay, so you're sending some mixed signals here. Now that I'm finally getting back to imgflip after many days off, I think I have better people to talk to. You're all over the place, and not particularly worth spending time on. But still, thanks for your time.

Lmao It's not mixed signals dude, it's your inability to read things beyond the mere linkage of words with your eyes, using the resultant cognitive dissonance to try and get me into a gotcha that only exists in your head.

I'm all over the place because this manipulative crap is all over the stream, besides, I'm glad you've recognized that, it means I'm living rent free in your head for not being so easily shut up by such dirty and, on the other hand, incredibly hamfisted rhetorical tricks (You're dealing with someone whose mother language isn't even of Anglo-Saxon-Franco-Germanic roots, you should be aceing this shit bro!)

Are you telling me I can see your attempts at molding your own language like clay to twist my argument, better than you can conceal them yourself?.

My statement isn't so hard to understand bro.

Reagan systemically destroyed American unions that were part of the grassroots element of the Democratic Party.

The purpose of this was to destroy the Democratic Party's working class element so political opportunists known as Corporate Democrats, AKA DINO's, would rebuild it into something greater than it was before, but completely different, and much, much more to the right.

This includes more money, deeper bed-fellowing with mass media, tho at the capitalist corporate level over the intellectual, more money by Corporate Super PACs than what you make from collective donations, more corruption because corporate money's accountability is always harder to achieve, etc...

Reagan's deadly mutilation, It's the reason why the Clintons, and many other, were able to become such crooks without impunity, and why the Republican Party has it so easy to win XD, besides different forms of legalized voter fraud, including, but not limited to, voter suppression laws.

It's the reason Bill gutted welfare (very leftism...., welfare for work programs without severe enforcement of laws, that force companies to invest in wages and workforce expansion [like it used to be the thing before Reagan, even with very much Republican POTUS's, when companies were legally obligated to either invest profits in the business/workforce, or pay massive income taxes])

He was basically keeping his friends close, and his enemies' remains rebuilt to his likeness, even closert.

All that wall of text you posted for nothing other than me having to post another wall of text explaining how utterly beyond salvation are the levels of wrong you're living under.

Have a nice day.

Although I understand..., the very fact Reagan turned the Democratic Party into a Republican Lite party, means it's hard for you to conceive it as a destruction, I shouldn't be asking you to think in too many layers at the same time.

What a gem!