Conception deception

First, please provide an example of a republican that doesn't want contraceptive use taught in sex ed. Yes, there might be some that don't like it taught to kids of a really young age and/or object to graphic demonstrations of how to put on a condom, but that doesn't count.

Want to know who really hates contraception and abortion? Catholics. Which way do most Catholics vote?

Took the words out of my mouth Abby, thank you.

Thanks. We've got to fight the trolls at every turn.

There's that word again, probably - means you have no proof.

The REAL Catholics vote red. The Unfortunately there aren't many Real Catholics anymore.

Mistyped. Should be no "the".

As a "voting block" Catholics almost universally have voted Democrat. While there has been a slight shift to the right most stick to the traditions of their FDR loving ancestors.

The majority of them oppose it like this: https://youtu.be/Q2ekPehWTBY

Then we should allow assault and battery, domestic abuse, etc., since, you know, we wouldn't want to tell anyone what to do with their bodies.

And prematurely and viciously ending another's life doesn't "affect" them?

Oh it doesn't, eh? LOL

A red herring.

Because big business provides the most jobs.

six out of ten Americans support Roe v Wade.

Pretty sure you have no clue that roe vs wade said it wasn't a baby until it had a heartbeat. With modern technology you can detect a heartbeat at 3 weeks.

Roe says a woman has a right to privacy until the fetus is capable of surviving outside the womb, then states are allowed to legislate into it. Seriously, do right-wingers intentionally spread false information or really absorb excessive amounts of misinformation and believe it? Wow.

Nope. Read it again. The moment a heartbeat is detected is a baby. That's why the Supreme Court upheld TX law.

You're describing the Texas Law, not SCOTUS precedent. You also totally misunderstand the Court's ruling. They haven't made a decision about the Texas abortion law, except that it can remain in place until they reach a verdict, plus abortion providers can continue to sue the state over the ban. Nothing to do with the law itself, in fact, they returned the case to lower courts.

And a majority of Germans supported concentration camps. Does that make it right?

deflect ahahahaha

Yes you are hahahaha

Did you know, that throughout the Second World War, Germany used armored jeeps, tanks, trains, and aircraft with wheels, and that using a wheel for any task basically makes you a Nazi?

if i compare it to Nazi Germany, it's obviously bad

I was using it as an example to show that just because a majority supports something, that doesn't mean that it's right.
Of course, that's above the level of function for your two brain cells. ;)

eyyy anyone with more than two brain cells can figure out that all it takes is one dude to effect the opinions of the masses. it's worth mentioning that there was a 9:1 ratio of people who supported hitler to people who didn't from 1938-1945, while the roe v. wade situation is more of a 6:4.

Eyyy I think one of your two just died

dunno what motivated you to come back with that of all things when you were the lobotomite who brought up hitler. can't debate for a dime

facepalm: symptoms of the libtard obamiam-holocaust-believer disease as they can barely comprehend what they're learning, and the new brain patterns give them a headache

Just shut up already. It's really quite annoying.

are you a libtard or an american? it's a simple question

apologies if the truth offends you

Don't break your brain cell- it's your last one

Sounds like projection but okay.

anyway, it's well-known that obama and the clintons are behind the holocaust myth. for a start, adolf hitler never existed, and neither did germany until 1991

"Sounds like projection but okay."

the no u tactic came as expected.

What the hell are you going on about? Do you think you're funny? Because you're really not.

come now. don't lose brain cells over the truth. face it: the holocaust never happened, and you're now doing obama's work by believing it and spouting the lies about it.

Yep it's definitely me losing the brain cells definitely definitely me unquestionably me and definitely not you

are you an american? or are you a libtard post-obama era holocaust believer?

Well ya broke it

Mhmm mkay

it doesn't take a brain cell to figure that in 2009, obama released a supersonic wave that altered the brain to think that the holocaust actually happened. it didn't effect children, however, children in school were easy to feed propaganda. by admitting the holocaust's existence, you are perpetuating a dangerous myth that obama spoonfed you and brainwashed you into having.

now tell me this: are you a libtard, or an american?

I don't know if there's any good indication of that. They were desensitized to them, for sure. It's only been discovered in recent years that Germans were aware of the camps before the end of WWII. And if they knew, it wasn't much. Hitler was popular, no question, but remember the Weimar Republic before his chancellorship was the initial governorship of the Social Democrats, then non-partisans and Centre Party politicians. He was appointed Chancellor. The Nazis never won a majority vote. There was a growing right-wing and nationalistic pulse in Germany that helped give rise to the Nazis, but few Communists and Social Democrats defected to the Nazi Party.

But anyway, the Holocaust and abortion are not similar unless you really stretch how you perceive abortion. Abortion is most often the result of low-income women of color unable to afford children or any more children, or unintentionally produced a fertilized egg due to lack of reliable contraception. A majority of aborted pregnancies were not intended to begin with. Women should have that bodily autonomy to remove a growing fetus if they do not want it. It's not exactly murder because it won't become a person.

You really missed my point. The point is that even if a majority support something doesn't mean it's right.

Then what would it become? And it's not "becoming" anything. It is already a person.

You are not a person if you are physically attached and nurtured by a host via umbilical cord. For most of the pregnancy, and, in fact, when more than 97 percent of abortions take place, the fetus is incapable of surviving on its own outside the womb.

So since that person is dependent upon another person, that negates their right to life?

A "host"? You mean a mother?

Because you are growing inside a person, and are completely reliant on their body for nutrients and oxygen, blood, everything you need to survive, it is safe to say it is the host, the mother, who has the autonomy here and if she no longer wants this growth she has a right for it to be removed.

So it is the child's dependency upon the mother that determines whether or not he gets a right to life? Or perhaps his location, being inside the mother?

A "growth"? You mean a child?

You: How's the growth?
Pregnant woman: Excuse me?
You: Yeah, the growth. It must be so exciting being a host.
Pregnant woman: WTF?

It is up to the mother to carry the pregnancy to term or not.

So... No rebuttal? Figures.