I love history and math, Stanley. I would heartily suggest you check into them. For your own sake, if nothing else.
As is always the case with libtards, what they accuse you of (well, in this case me) is exactly what applies to them. In the case of libtard politicians, when they accuse anyone (Trump, for example) of doing anything, or say that his re-election will result in something happening, that's exactly what they're doing, or what will happen if they're elected. (notice I didn't say re-elected!)
The same applies to you, my dear imgflip friend Stanley. Aside from not addressing the entire point of my post, as usual, you wander off into tangents that are irrelevant.
The point I made is so obvious, yet you have *never* addressed it in all the times I've posted it as a reply to one of your comments. Instead, you make the same point over and over, with zero substantiation. Why is that?
What the heck, I'll try again. Did the media, or did they not, go after Trump non-stop, in every way possible during his campaign, and during his presidency? The answer is an obvious and resounding YES.
So why did they stop short on this particular issue? Please answer that.
Well, I've already answered it for you, but since you have a debilitating case of TDS, I'll answer it for you again. There's either nothing there, or there's nothing that can be proven. Because if there was, the media would have been all over it. But they weren't, because there isn't.
I hope you paid attention this time Stanley.
