Your judgement is trash if you think Kyle shouldn't have been there but people burning down the town should be.

That's LITERALLY all the MSM are saying. BLM rioters good - Kyle Rittenhouse bad.

Bla bla - he shouldn't have been there (he had a job and family there) - bla bla - he crossed state lines with a gun (he didn't) - bla bla - he provoked them (by blocking a skateboard with his head)

Yeah yeah, we all know what news you watch in between My Little Pony porn.

my little kyle.
my little ashli.

both crossed state lines.

I have heard people say he was there to cause trouble and shouldn't have been there. Then crickets on literally everything riot related except bugaloo nonsense.

Cool, show me the leftist talking head saying Kiddie-rapist Rosenbaum shouldn’t have been there.

Put up or shut up.

kiddie incestist trump said he would be there with the jan 6 rioters.

and then ran and hid.

"And even people who don't condemn the rioters and looters aren't saying they should have been there."

Do you never cease your dishonesty? If they aren't saying they *should* have been there, then show me where they said they *shouldn't* have been there.

You lie because you hate the truth.

If someone repeatedly and loudly insists that person A should not have been there, but never says a word about person B being there, it is reasonable to infer they approve of the presence of person B.

This is basic logic, which is why it’s beyond you.

If someone repeatedly and loudly insists that person A should not have been there, but never says a word about person B being there, it is reasonable to infer they approve of the presence of person B.

This is basic logic, which is why it’s beyond you.

See how this works?

Here's one for your mantle.

When they yammer on and on about how Kyle “crossed state lines” but never mention how many of the rioters travelled from much farther, it’s implicit.

Stop lying.

When you yammer on and on about how many of the rioters “crossed state lines” but never mention how Kyle also travelled from afar to shoot people dead, it’s implicit.

Stop lying.

See how this works, Zak?

you know who else crossed state lines?

ashli.

Agree need more folks like Kyle to eliminate scumbags

kyle can work as a capitol cop when this is over.

Was Ashli attacking him?

So, no

Once again - was Ashli attacking him?

There is photographic evidence that she was nowhere near him - or anyone. Her hands were visible (she was using them to climb into the room).

Ashli Babbitt is so completely different than the Kyle Rittenhouse situation that I can't believe you're attempting to bring it up in the same conversation. She didn't threaten to kill him (as Joseph Rosenbaum did), she didn't attempt to take his gun (as Joseph Rosenbaum did), she didn't hit him in the head twice with a skateboard (as Anthony Huber did), and she did not point a gun at him (as Gaige Grosskreutz did).

So, in no way does the Ashli Babbitt shooting resemble Kyle Rittenhouse. In fact, the absence of any provocation should have earned Michael Byrd a murder charge.

That isn't the correct use of bluff

she thought they wouldn't shoot a "woman".

Thank you for confirming that you did not use "bluff" correctly.

she THOUGHT it was a bluff :)

but they shot her :)

Which people was the negligent diversity hire protecting? Be specific please.

Who was IN THAT ROOM that Ashli posed an IMMINENT THREAT TO.

BE SPECIFIC, you foul liar.

As if "negligent diversity hire" is the cause of your 'job status'

what does his race have to do with his excellent shooting skills?

ima call him J&J just one shot :)

He sure seemed pretty adept at passing that job proficiency test on Jan 6th.

Perhaps Zak just needs some more efficient job training and a hug.

he shot that woman without regard to her race or gender.

not an ounce of bias in the man.

Ham & Cheese Hero - but hold the ecru condiment

Oh please, we all know he did it due to a deep seated hatred for anyone of the 'ecru' complexion...

who wouldn't? :)

Hey, the ecrus have rights too, you know.

It's not a racial slur, it's an underused word!
If it was, it'll become a TOS violation and that'll be that.

https://imgflip.com/i/5uvzob https://i.imgflip.com/5uvzob.jpg

I'm a law abiding citizen though, and will have no part in tarring the fine image of "ecru" by turning it into a reference for people whose rights are being stripped away faster than a Russian hooker (or two) can empty their bladders on a shriveled senile cretinous blob with orange rind tinted skin and a bleached mummified raccoon affixed to his head in a fancy Russian hotel loaded with spy cameras.

you should write menus :)

https://imgflip.com/i/5uvzob https://i.imgflip.com/5uvzob.jpg

Hey, if you want to get 24hrs off here everyday, go for it!

On the other hand, egg-shelled toned today, Pillsbury Dough Boy tomorrow, why not be flexible?

egg shelled toned LOL

hahaha, Soylent Ecru!

unflavored mayo = soylen ecru :)

president pelosi, vice president pence, others.

He wasn’t an active shooter. If he was he would have emptied all 30 rounds as he was running down the street. He acted in self defense against direct attacks on his person and you been wrong with your harpy screeching so many times it’s pathetic.

just like byrd.

Who called him an active shooter?

neither byrd nor rittenhouse were active shooters.

they were both defending themselves :)

Except Byrd had no immediate threat. No one tried to take his gun or screamed they were going to kill him. He also was supposedly a trained professional and not a 17 year old kid.

every cop says he did.

Of course they do. Cops have to really do something bad before other cops will say that one of their own did something wrong.

mmm hmmm.

He did what?

the right thing :)

Nope, they know if that was a black woman he would have been tried and in prison.

then why do cops stand with byrd?