Imgflip Logo Icon

We the people ...

We the people ... | Abraham Lincoln | image tagged in abraham lincoln | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1,856 views 98 upvotes Made by chedmacq 3 years ago in politics
86 Comments
7 ups, 3y
Both parties are corrupt
[deleted]
3 ups, 3y
Hulk upvote taco | image tagged in hulk upvote taco | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
4 ups, 3y,
3 replies
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
It's "We the People" not "We the Democrats". Hopefully they will learn that in 2022 unless they can steal that election, too.
6 ups, 3y,
4 replies
They haven't learned that from losing elections in the past, it's highly unlikely they will learn that from losing elections in the future. And now that they've learned that no matter how obviously questionable the poll practices and results are, auditing the results will be rejected as well as any results of that audit, I would expect any cheating to get even more blatant.
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
We can't forget their media allies. When something simple and righteous, such as making sure the person voting is who they say they are, gets labeled racism by the media, it's a big problem. Or even worse, when something like that is called a Jim Crow law by none other than our demented president, and the media says it's real, that's a big problem.
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Voter laws that apply to all races equally are impossible to be racist. Hope common sense cleared that up for you. How's prison in Australia going?
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
They can be APPLIED racistly. Which the GQP does
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
No they can't.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Just ignore the closing of DMVs etc in minority communities.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
We don't vote at DMVs here in the USA.

You really are down unda, aren't you?
0 ups, 3y
Playing dumb, LOL.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
If you can explain to me how verifying identity is racist, then I'll stop thinking that it's not.
0 ups, 3y
Nobody said verifying identity is racist. None of the recent laws are about verifying identity.
3 ups, 3y,
3 replies
Yeah until we start charging people with sedition and hanging them, they are going to continue to cheat and the will of the people will be thwarted.
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
It's funny that a year ago the guillotine was seen everywhere, but the left has stopped using that symbol.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Interesting side note; they had to stop using guillotines when they concluded that people were able to walk up to them too courageously; not the response they were hoping for. Drawing and quartering, not so much.
3 ups, 3y,
2 replies
For some reason I cannot see libprogocrats doing that.

A coward dies a thousand deaths.
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
You're the coward
1 up, 3y
That's your opinion lmao.😬
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Not joe
1 up, 3y
Joe is the biggest coward president we have ever had.

1. He's cared of a virus - he's vaccinated, but he fears it so much he's going to make you vaccinate.
2. Takes only certain reporter questions or takes no questions at all because he is too scared to hear the truth in their criticism.
3. Turned tail and ran - stranding his own citizens in Afghanistan.
4. Shuts down drone flights at Texas City where thousands of illegal immigrants have crossed or will cross or are in the process of crossing because he is afraid of the backlash.
5. Was so afraid that he backed out of the last Presidential debates - after getting his butt handed to him by Trump in the first debate.
6. Was so afraid of the COVID - he didn't even bother to hold real support rallies, instead having 12-15 people in attendance.
7. Was so afraid of protestors that were white - that he had the fence put back up during 9/11 weekend.
8. Lives in fear so much - that he literally has to have a teleprompter tell him what to say, for fear he will bungle up whatever lies he is speaking.
9. Such a coward that his cowardice has infected the Democratic party all the way down - to where people like you are also afraid to open their eyes and speak up and out against Biden.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
who has this power?
0 ups, 3y
He Man. Wait, no - now it's Skeletor.
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
And you claim the left is hateful.
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
There are fair punishments for treason, thwarting the will of the people in our free nation, election fraud, committing murder, committing millions of dollars of damages while protesting, and for abandoning US Citizens behind enemy lines.

Unfortunately - the powers that be aren't seeking to punish any of the Democrats that have been doing that (either in the last 8 months or) since May of 2020 in the United States.

So saying an extreme act of aggression against these vile individuals isn't hateful - it's almost a necessary step at this point.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Oh. . .you're back. . .have you decided to take a break from turning your neighbors over to the Aussie Gestapo?
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Tell me you don't know shit without telling me you don't know shit.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
So you're saying Australia is not incredibly strict in enforcing covid lockdowns? That's not what I hear from my wife (and from her family who all live in Australia) and what I've seen on the news (which we know is always 100% accurate, right?)

It's your country, so you and your fellow Aussies can deal with covid any way you want.

See how I did that? It's amazing that someone would actually believe in letting the people from a country, run it the way they want! You might want to consider adopting such an attitude.
0 ups, 3y
When you're a fascism and voter suppression supporter, you don't (or shouldn't) get that luxury.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Hateful scum sucking pieces of shit, to be precise.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
No sense of irony. Tut tut.
2 ups, 3y
Kettle meet pot - pot, meet Kettle.
1 up, 3y


Stuff like that is why I made this meme
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
What "questionable" results and practices?
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Wait - is it that there needs to be election reform or there aren't questionable results and practices? It can't be both.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Huh?
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
If there aren't questionable results - then why are the people seeking reform?

If there are questionable results - then those situations should have been looked at by officials and judges (in actual court cases).

You can't say the election was free and fair - if there are questionable results, that need to have reform on voting. If there is reform on voting - then the results weren't good.

So which is it? Was it the fairest election ever like Democrats say? If not - then why didn't they investigate anything? If it was the fairest election - then why are there democrats seeking change?

They on one hand say it's fair - then on the other hand complain about the laws needing changed....

It's called ironic.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Fact: it was a free, fair and secure election.
Fact: Republicans tried dirty tactics that they are trying to make into law.
Fact: neither of these facts are incompatible.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
You literally believe all the crap you read/see from the media that these laws are racist, right?

Have you read the laws? Or do you, like many of your liberal ilk, only know what to think when the media tells you what to think? Open your eyes! Check up on them from time to time. After a while, when you see how agenda-driven they are, and just flat out wrong in many instances, you too may open your eyes to reality. Give it a try. You would probably find it quite refreshing.
0 ups, 3y
So you haven't read the bills.
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Closing counting "for the day" and sending away poll observers, then resuming counting after they have left is extremely questionable.
Statistical improbabilities indicating probable widespread fraud, though that fraud could be from either side, or balanced between both. It's telling that the left refused basic neutral audits. (Now the only group performing audits clearly has an agenda so the results would be questionable)
0 ups, 3y
Fake news as always.
1 up, 3y
You're just so stupid and wrong. Stop only listening to that orange head, republican.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
No election was PROVED to be stolen. Lack of participation in election checkups isn't proof that an election was clean and fair. It just means the people at the top said no to checking into it.

Judges, magistrates, and even Supreme Court officials - decided on fear whether they would or wouldn't take up the matters at hand. Some were coerced into not taking a stand - by threats or bribes. Others decided that making a call - and that leading to a change on situations - would lead to even worse public outlash from BLM. It was literally overheard in the Supreme Court - that the supreme court feared what BLM would do.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Nobody said no to checking it, and there's still zero evidence.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Literally every judge tossed out cases without hearing them. Every single one of them.
0 ups, 3y
Tell me you definitely haven't read any of the court cases or rulings without telling me you haven't read any of the court cases or rulings.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
My opinion (note how I use that word, that concept...and try to adopt it yourself, please) is that in the coming years, the proof will come out. But by then people will look at it sort of how we look at Kennedy stealing the election from Nixon (with a lot of help from Mayor Daly in Chicago.) Oh, and just in case you're wondering, here in America we do not believe the ends justify the means. Just because Nixon was caught at being a crook, doesn't mean it was okay for the crook Kennedy to steal the election.
0 ups, 3y
There's never been proof that the '60 election was stolen, either. The results aren't a matter of dispute or opinion. America elected Joe, and that's that.
Show More Comments
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • image.png
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    Abraham Lincoln