Hahaha. Clever little trap. Here's how it is.
As I recall, the bakery was sued, was it not? The Colorado Civil Rights Commission even found them to be discriminatory towards the gay couple wanting their product. The bakery then appealed all the way up to SCOTUS where the Commission's decision was reversed based on the bakery owner's freedom of religious expression (its a bit more complicated but I'm speaking in general terms).
So what we have here is a Type 1/Type 2 error. Who was discriminated against? Obviously the gay people who were refused a cake! Obviously the business owner because of religion expression! If you want to talk about "woke people"... let's talk about how defining everything as discriminatory, ironically, makes nothing discriminatory by definition. Unless, of course, we're going with the "Progressive Stack" unofficial model... which is a conversation for another post.
On the subject of unions -- I'm not sure how we got here but... here we are -- unions are not a product of "woke people" (as a tangent: that is such a stupid term... like when people call me a "Person of Color" mindlessly not realizing it's just another way of calling me a "Colored Person". So stupid!). Collective bargaining is a product of capitalism. When you can corner a market you have greater influence over that market. So if you can control all of the labor, you can argue for a better deal for the laborers. This wouldn't work in most other economic systems, certainly not under Socialism or Communism, and has nothing to do with how "woke" they are... and to imply such is silly.