What a shit show.

Copying and pasting a definition doesn't make you intelligent, it makes you look desperate and weak. You accomplished both.

So tell me exactly how anything in your rebuttal is intellectual or factual?

2 Trump hating Republicans isn't exactly partisan. Why did Democrats reject 2 Republicans in favor of 2 Republicans that previously voted to impeach him? How is a hearing partisan when all the members were chosen by one party? Those are questions a child could answer, but Democrats like yourself can't answer.

Show me evidence of anyone kissing Trump's ring. You are deflecting and gaslighting to defend the Rhinos and prop up your feeble argument.

Facts are reasonable. Proof is reasonable. And Democrats like you ignored both when the facts and evidence didn't fit their lying narrative.
I'll cite the "Trump locked children in cages photo" that was photographed during the Obama administration or the lying narrative "Maga hat wearing Trump supporters attacked Juicy Smollet during a polar vortex in Chicago" or the Maga hat wearing Covington students harassed a peaceful Native American playing his drum.
Democrats colluded with the media to push those lies.
You are the one who didn't use intellect. You blindly believed what Democrats told you.
You're the one who drank the Kool Aid keep asking for more.

Crying and rejecting elections and facts is exactly what Democrats did for four years. Making up lies like the "Trump-Russia collusion" and accusations of Quid pro quo with no evidence to support it was not only unreasonable it just made Democrats look like the liars and the threat to democracy they accused Trump of.

Outstanding reply! Well reasoned and well-stated!

'Nuff said!!!! Cheers!!!!

Name calling isn't the best way to reason with someone. A reasonable person would know that.

Well you can believe what ever you like afterall you clearly believe a lot of things that are not true

You couldn't counter anything I said, I'm not surprised. After all you clearly believe a lot of things that are not true.

We don't need to counter your fake outrage about being called a "name" We could actually insult you but we prefer to stay away from that as much as possible.

It's called being an adult. We use facts and rational thought instead

You couldn't counter anything I sad, and your pitiful excuse is... you don't have to., and then you lie about not calling us names when name calling it all you did.
t's right there for everyone to see.

You aren't an adult, you're a child confusing your feelings with facts. Everyone can see that, you can't because you're incapable of rational thought.

It is only there for you to see in your imagination. It is a deflection in order to ignore you have no geniune argurments that prove "Democrats" are "destroying" America.

We dont care for some Democrat polices or Joe Biden. But we unlike you who have not leaped head 1st off the insanity cliff into a abyss of BS

The prime example the "rigged" election. lol

Go ahead and claim Trumplicans are not utterly brainwashed about the "rigged" election.

You haven't presented a genuine argument,, name calling and making pitiful excuses for your name calling is all you've done.

Yep, I have no genuine argurments (spelling is the bane of lefties pretending to be smart) that prove "Democrats" are "destroying" America, other than Democrats that chanted "No borders no wall, No America at all" as they burned American flags. I can provide other evidence, but you'll ignore it, you'll move the goal posts and lie about something else.

You don't care for some Democrat polices or Joe Biden, but instead of focusing on the disastrous policies of Biden and Democrats, you're going to continue throwing a temper tantrum about the last president because you can't defend Joe Biden and Democrats disastrous policies. That is deflection

You leaped head 1st off the insanity cliff into a abyss of BS when you put on your va**na hats and yelled at the sky because your candidate lost.

The prime example The "Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election" lie.

Go ahead and project about brainwashing when you were brainwashed into believing Russia made Americans vote for Orangemanbad.

We don't recall calling you any "names" Or anyone else here but maybe we did after they chose to use ad hominen attacks against us.

You are no claiming to be reasonable? Ok here is a great reasonable question for you.

Do you think you can defend "right wing" BS by invoking Democrat BS.

Do you actually believe calling Biden a Pedo somehow means Trump is innocent or a good guy?

We are not saying you called him a Pedo. There are many Trumpflakes who do,

We don't accuse Trump of things there is 0 proof of. We are not Democrat or Trump supporting children

Since you attacked Charles in your very first reply on this thread, your entire ‘ad hominem’ excuse is complete bullsh*t.

You may claim you aren’t DemoKKKrats, but you sure as hell sound, and act, like they do.

You just called me a Trump Zombie in your last reply. Lying about it won't save you.

You saying you recall calling you any "names" is an absolute lie You called us deplorables racists, misogynists, homophobes, traitors and Russian puppets. In your defense... I don't expect you to remember calling us names over the past 4 years when you can't remember calling us names in a reply you made an hour ago.

Ad hominen attacks like that are what people like you rely on when you can't debate. It's right there for everyone to see.

You are now claiming to be reasonable after using = Ad hominen attacks.

The answer to your question is Yes. When you just admitted it is Democrat BS. You had the opportunity to refute what I said, but instead chose to say it is BS without presenting any facts.

How does calling Biden a Pedo have anything to do with Trump? It doesn't. You would know this if you were a reasonable person.

Oh look, more Ad hominen attacks from someone pretending to be reasonable.

You aren't accusing Trump of things there is 0 proof of. You aren't defending children either.
You are defending someone with a history of inappropriate behavior with children and invoking Trump when he has absolutely nothing to do with Biden's Pedo behavior.

You are not Democrat or Trump. You're an unreasonable person who can't debate and uses ad hominen attacks to prop up your feeble arguments.

That was not calling you a "name" It was describing your mentallity towards Trump

Trumplicans, Trump Zombie, Trumpphants.

It's just a Hyperbolic way of saying you will support Trump no matter what it seems.

You have chosen to be part of a group that "behaves" like a cult does. And acting such a way is not "reasonable"

We are sure you will now continue to defend the indefencible.

It has been over 4 years now almost 5. And still "TRUMPLICANS" refuse to accept and acknowledge "ANY" facts and evidence that maybe, Just maybe you and the rest chose the wrong guy.

We can prove this by asking very simple questions to a Trumpoholic.

Just answser this Q in a reasonable and rational way without logical fallacies or mentioning full of shirt Democrats.

Why would someone who is a rational and reasonable person ever defend someone like Trump.

He has a life long proven history of not being a good person and is not trustable in any way. Yet in 2016 people who used to be "Republicans" threw away common sense, reason, and rational thought to elect a lowest of the low common denominator person.

We prefered ANY of the others in The Primaries and we chose Kiasch

Instead of confronting what "Trumphants" chose to do they rationalize their insanity.

Reasonable people do not behave this way.

Name calling is name calling no matter how you twist it in your mind.

Your excuse for name calling is pitiful and a lie. You were calling us names before Trump was inaugurated.

Name calling isn't hyperbolic. it's a tool used by weak people who can't debate rationally and maturely. Name calling is all you have, the evidence is littered throughout your reply.

You have chosen to be part of a group that "behaves like a petulant child when they didn't get their way" And acting such a way is not "reasonable" or "mature"

We are now sure you will continue to be unreasonable and childish.

It has been over 4 years now almost 5. And still " Anti-Trumpers " refuse to provide "ANY" facts and evidence that Trump did anything to violate his oath of office. You refuse to accept and acknowledge your candidate lost.

The answer is easy, you've provided no evidence Trump did anything that violated his oath of office.
Two separate partisan impeachment hearings were held, both failed to remove Trump from office due to lack of evidence. Here's where you prove what a hypocrite you are by refusing to abide by your own rules and act irrational and resort to illogical fallacies by mentioning full of shirt Republicans were traitors.

Only someone who is an irrational unreasonable and biased would continue to whine about a former President in a feeble attempt to deflect from the ineptitude of the current president.

Being a good person has nothing to do with being a strong leader. No politicians are trustable in any way. You would know this if you had common sense.
Yet in 2015 before Trump announced his candidacy he was a Democrat And the lowest of the low common denominator Democrats praised and revered him.

Who you chose in the primary is immaterial. Trump won the nomination. That's how American elections work.

Instead of confronting the current president that can't complete a coherent sentence, isn't allowed to hold press conferences, refuses to address the border situation, caused massive inflation and has lost the confidence of American citizens, you'd rather continue complaining about an Ex-President.

Reasonable people do not behave this way. And you're proven how unreasonable and childish you are.

That's because Pelosi is responsible for the lack of law enforcement on site that would have stopped it from happening. They don't want the investigation to show that.