Liberal hypocrisy marches on.

Thank you for your quite poignant commentary. Significant to our times, I have reposted several for their relevance! -v

Thanks again Vince

2g3mm3.gif (click to show) Clapping awesome meme

the law only applies to conservatives and those who uphold the constitution, but social media is allowed to discriminate their services.

I agree and upvote your comment, but he actually won in the Supreme Court "In a 7–2 decision, the Court ruled on narrow grounds that the Commission did not employ religious neutrality, violating Masterpiece owner Jack Phillips' rights to free exercise, and reversed the Commission's decision." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masterpiece_Cakeshop_v._Colorado_Civil_Rights_Commission

Difference being is that the baker is arguing that HIS first amendment rights (religion) are being violated by being forced to make a cake that goes against his religious beliefs.

Now, if the lunch counter owners had subscribed to some whack religion that stated he could only serve people in a segregated dining room then he might have had an argument too.

Yeah he won but now another homo is sueing em.

You are a master of the English language if nothing else.

Party On -595vd4.jpg (click to show) - Upvote for you!

Awesome!!

Don't think Liberal/Conservative but rather Democrat/Republican with this kind of thing and it will all make sense.

See also Separation of Church & State during the lock down when the State denied even 'Drive In Sermons'.

That was wrong too, not sure of your point?

Going to be an uphill battle for Trump. The Covington Kid easily won because when everyone heard the facts it was game over MSM. What should be Trump's concern is he will be asked what was on his mind when he wrote a lot of those Tweets that triggered the Left.

Your hypocrisy is as obvious and as shameless as your phoney outrage.

Wait when was it decided private business has to abide the 1st amendment because multiple court cases say just the opposite.

When was the last time that you saw a segregated lunch counter or water fountains marked "colored" and "white"?

That has nothing to do with the 1st amendment which specifically states it is to keep the rights of the people and the GOVERNMENT cannot crack down on free speech that is not violent of course. Nothing in it I can find about a private company. I of course am not a slimy lawyer who is good at twisting words though either.

OK, first of all, here's the text of the 1st Amendment so that we both can agree what we're talking about because I see nothing where it "specifically states it is to keep the rights of the people":

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The rest of this you should learn when you get to 10th grade civics, but they might not teach this anymore so I'll give you a quick lesson free of charge. The Bill of Rights and constitution are not the only laws of the land. There are thousands of laws passed over time on the federal, state, county, and municipal levels. The constitution and bill of rights are the yardstick to determine if these thousands of laws are CONSTITUTIONAL.

Since the 1st Amendment includes "the right of the people peaceably to assemble" there have been dozens (hundreds perhaps) of laws PROTECTING people's rights to peaceably assemble and these laws have been deemed CONSTITUTIONAL. Yes, these laws most definitely apply to PRIVATE COMPANIES. You can't own an apartment complex that only rents to whites or excludes blacks, Hispanics, Jews, or LBGTQRS+. You can't own a company where you only hire _____. Again, there are literally thousands of similar examples, surely you can find your own.

Get it? No charge for the civics lesson.

CONGRESS shall make NO LAW. Boom.

Reading lesson was free too. You are welcome.

Now go get your white hood dry cleaned Abby Normal.

Used to be websites stated if they were open platform, conservative, liberal, etc. on the front page. There was no mistaking what a political website was all about. It was called 'Truth in Advertising'.

He wants everyone to know, he is always the victim, of his own doing. Oh, and send him money- he is broke

Uhh isn’t that what the dems also say “We want money from the government cause we’re poor” so a politician always asking the civilians for money should be fair if the civilians can ask the politicians

You got your white hood all cleaned and pressed for the rally this weekend?