Well that's a bit more than half.
So per capita then.
As seen in the chart, most of those murdered are by their own race or ethinicity.
Given that 'Whites' are the majority, it would make sense that there would be that much more possible situations in which they could be killed. More Walmarts are more likely to be shoplifted from than Joe Bob's Dry Grocers for a reason.
What's surprising is the number of 'Blacks' killed by 'Whites,' given this 5:1 imbalance.
After all, while neighborhoods that are majority 'Black' tend to be mixed to some degree, 'White' majority neighborhoods tend to be more exclusive, even the poorer ones.
Reasons for murders of course aren't included in the tabulation, nor number of arrests vs conviction. Most murders are probably 'collateral' crimes - occuring as secondaries to robbery, assault, rape, drug deals gone bad, etc - all which tends to be local.
Even though closer to half as much murder, given that 5:1 ratio, it's a higher number of 'Blacks,' expected to be murdered by 'Whites' since there's that much smaller a population for the situation to arise, and "Whites' tend to not be overly eager to venture into their neighborhoods, meaning an even smaller segment of that population would have had to venture into other areas where they might be targeted.
Then there's number of arrests vs convictions, which skews the numbers to some degree, given that until 2017, more 'Whites' were arrested for capital crimes, yet more 'Blacks' were convicted
- and that's just arrests. Not included are the numbers that were never caught or charged. 'Blacks' tending to get scrutinized more by law enforcement further skews the number to some degree as they are more likely to get arrested with less evidence.
So yeah, the number of 'Whites' killed by 'Blacks' (who tend to be poorer, poor folks having a greater tendency to commit crime) is shocking, but the number of "Blacks' killed by 'Whites' is even more of a surprise considering the smaller population to access.