He needs to be tried for crimes against humanity

Reconvene the Nuremberg Court.

I never understood where the theory for the asymptomatic spreader came from or how they magically measured it.

Duh, it was as plain as the nose on our faces that Fauci was a liar. OF COURSE YOU HAVE SYMPTOMS BEFORE THE VIRUS IS TRANSMISSIBLE!!!! I can't stand how indoctrinated everyone is these days. It makes me sick.(Not covid lol) In additon, we never needed the masks to begin with, because they don't work. The virus particles(not droplets) and masks are parallel to a mosquito passing through a chain link fence.

Most of the government needs to be tried as traitors. But it'll never happen.

Stop it you killing liberals with facts

That's not even close to what those emails showed.

Cool. Then please explain where he's wrong. Your blanket denials are neither interesting nor informative.

Here are all of the emails in PDF form.

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20793561/leopold-nih-foia-anthony-fauci-emails.pdf

There are 33 mentions of hydroxychloroquine in all 2000 emails. NOT ONCE does Fauci say it's safe or effective. What he says REPEATEDLY is there is no data and they are currently authorizing trials to test its effectiveness.

Translation: The Right warned the Fauci worshiping Left about the Doctor and turned out to be correct; and so now the Left want to reject facts in favor of their feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeelings about the rogue M.D.

Again, not even close.

You are ignorant if you took that snide comment seriously. So, just out of curiosity, how did it feel when you did it?

Here are all of the emails in a searchable PDF.

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20793561/leopold-nih-foia-anthony-fauci-emails.pdf

Not a thing you posted is true. NOT ONE.

1. You're an idiot if you think any of us believes you read through 2300 pages of ANYTHING.
2. The interpretation of reality is never something that any sane person would take from a liberal.
3. You're an idiot regardless.

I didn't claim to read them all.

Do you not know how to search a PDF for a word?

ctrl+F then put the word you want to find in there. Hit enter.

There are 33 mentions of hydroxychloroquine in all 2000 emails. NOT ONCE does Fauci say it's safe or effective. What he says REPEATEDLY is there is no data and they are currently authorizing trials to test its effectiveness.

You have posted nothing but lies and you know it. Otherwise you'd be able to point to the exact emails that support your claims.

To begin with, I knew all of this was true long before the release of the e-mails. There was never any true basis in science for any of their nonsense.

But you're going to have to do better than a word search. Your problem is that you probably didn't do the word search yourself, but rather are taking the "fact" checkers at their word, but even if you did, reading comprehension and understanding of context would be necessary- something you no doubt lack.

Fauxci was on record long before this virus showed up that HCQ was safe, and useful in treating the then known coronoviruses. But if we move beyond your celebrity worship, we also had DECADES of use of the drug in dealing with all sorts of maladies. Facebook to this day false flags references to HCQ as being potentially dangerous. It is likely less dangerous than common aspirin.

And ANYONE that wished to nitpick a MEME, while ignoring the larger context, is a total moron. Fauxci was exposed by himself over and over, having contradicted himself and flip-flopping numerous times- that is a fact in evidence, and is consistent with the overall premise of this meme.

You can feel less embarrassed after being duped by the man- you are among many other such idiots unable to think for themselves.

Yes, I did do the word search myself. Then I read through all the instances of that word.

Unlike you, I read and gather information.

You, apparently, go off your assumptions (science is wrong!!!!) and then double down on that.

Not once has Fauci said that hydroxychloroquine was safe and effective in treating COVID-19. He has not said that in public. He did not say it in the emails.

It's only 33 instances. It's quick reading. Most of them are people emailing him, telling him that they think it's safe. The other half are him replying with "we don't know that. We're doing tests to see if that's true."

Go on.

Read what he really wrote. Learn some facts.

Speaking of assumptions: "You, apparently, go off your assumptions (science is wrong!!!!) and then double down on that."

And that to say nothing of his prior knowledge of the effectiveness of HCQ with other coronaviruses already known to exist. Given that he was aware of 'gain of function' work, he likely knew that C-19 was a lab mutated coronavirus. While there would be no guarantee that it would work on a "variant", it was already being used successfully by doctors around the world.

The very FACT that governments and liberal media outlets worked so hard to shut down talk about HCQ was evidence all of its own, and condemning evidence at that.

You jumped off a cliff without a parachute when you made those assumptions about me- you are a peon in contrast.

He did not have prior "knowledge of the effectiveness of HCQ" and he repeatedly states in his replies they are testing it for effectiveness.

We know from the genomic sequence (facts & science) that it's naturally occuring.

The rest of what you have to say here is fever-dream conspiracy nonsense.

You're not "special." You are not "aware now." You're not "doing the research." You're watching shit youtube videos.

"Not a thing you posted is true. NOT ONE."

So far, you have only attempted to prove the 3rd point as wrong. As to the others?

5, 6, and 7 are nonsense. That is clear and self-evident. Damn.

there is 0 evidence that covid was manmade. IN fact, since the genome was sequenced, we know it's naturally occurring.

Don't believe me? Here is some science for you: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9

Because I know you won't read that, here's the relevant part:

It is improbable that SARS-CoV-2 emerged through laboratory manipulation of a related SARS-CoV-like coronavirus. As noted above, the RBD of SARS-CoV-2 is optimized for binding to human ACE2 with an efficient solution different from those previously predicted7,11. Furthermore, if genetic manipulation had been performed, one of the several reverse-genetic systems available for betacoronaviruses would probably have been used19. However, the genetic data irrefutably show that SARS-CoV-2 is not derived from any previously used virus backbone20. Instead, we propose two scenarios that can plausibly explain the origin of SARS-CoV-2: (i) natural selection in an animal host before zoonotic transfer; and (ii) natural selection in humans following zoonotic transfer.

Science. From scientists. Not made up nonsense.

You can't "fund it" as it's not man made.

A meta-analysis of several studies pegs asymptomatic spread at about 17% of those infected. You can read the actual studies right here: (not that you will) https://jammi.utpjournals.press/doi/10.3138/jammi-2020-0030

So you see, moron, that Fauxci WAS in possession of such information, yet chose to ignore it for political reasons, as well as financial gain.

Yeah. Getting an email from some rando that starts with "as we are both physicians" is totes proof, bro.

He was totes in on it. Totes. I am sooooo busted. Wow.

Does the sarcasm come through? Because I'm doing it as hard as I can.

Come on. You're grasping at straws. That email has as much validity as the ones you get about male enhancement. That is literally someone emailing him and saying "my husband read an article today"

This is what happens when you have a conclusion and go looking for support instead of reading what is there and then forming a conclusion.

Here's a quick summary of the accuracy of your post:

1) Everything.

You are literally wrong about everything.