Misplaced Compassion?

Upvote

Spare us your Faux-compassion.

You keep voting in the guys who cut healthcare for vets.

Yeah. You do.

So stop pretending like you care. Because your votes say you don't.

As if homelessness appeared out of nowhere overnight.

[image deleted] Yeah, I took a look at your memes LOL. Typical liberal lemming.

Yeah. I took a look at yours.

So, do you wait until Tucker is done telling you what you think to attempt a meme or do you try during the middle of the show?

You're confused. Liberals are part of groupthink and love to accuse others of what they themselves are doing. I think for myself, and I'm pretty good at it.

I looked through your content, and that is clearly not true.

Look again, but have an adult explain it to you.

Aw, you're cute.

Sorry, I like women.

Shame they don't like you.

Since you don't know me, that comment means less than nothing to me.

Course it didn't, which is why you felt compelled to point out how totally unaffected you are to an innocuous statement that qualifies at most as banter on ye olde truth-o-meter.

Again, your on-brand homophobia makes it very clear you're neither an original nor a critical thinker.

LOL Yeah, I was compelled.

BTW, Something I forgot to mention about your Fred Trump article. Fred Trump was a DEMOCRAT donor.

So was his son, Donny.
In fact, they were both registered Democrats.

You really didn't come across that cute tidbit while searching for Da's philanthropic activities?
Well, now you know.

You're welcome!

You replied to yourself.

The Donny was first accused of being a racist by none other than Nixon's Justice Dept.
1973. Google.

Except your tidbit is BS. "Donny" was never accused of being a racist until he ran for president. If he was such a racist white supremacist, why was his show the top-rated show on NBC? And why would NBC not only hire a known racist but keep him on the payroll for 15 years? And Why did every celebrity want to be seen with him? And Why did the Clintons pal around with him for years?

LOL Try again.

Yep, that's how liberal Democrats talk and dress.

When the occasion doesn't call for white hoods, that is.

LOL Wow, when did white liberals begin to embrace Christianity?

LOL I hate to break it to you, but those were DEMOCRATS. The Democrat party is and always has been the party of racism and oppression in this country.

Question: Why are you trying to separate the 2 parties, by dissing one and trying to raise the party you like? You seem like a republican yet you just prove so many people's point by trying to raise yourself (some sort of self supremacism, i guess) and dissing other people making them feel/look lower in your own eyes(your segregating them), plus do you have proof it was "ALL" democrats?

LOL And out comes the racist card. As I wrote, liberals always accuse others of what they themselves are guilty of. When you can't win the argument, go to the personal attack. Saul Alinsky would be so proud.

In case you don't understand the concept of "R" and "D", the two parties ARE separate! I'm not raising myself above anyone. I haven't written one thing that isn't the truth. Just calling 'em like I see 'em.

Do I have proof what was all Democrats?

so your saying truth is what you see?... then you really need to get "back to reality" & FACE IT

Face what?

No, your amazing caps aside, that was the Ku Klux Klan.

You can look up the article and peruse it for a quote to counter that if you wish. I'll wait.

I don't need to peruse it because, unlike you apparently, I know history. Yeah, exactly. It was the Klan. And who were the Klan comprised of? Who gave birth to the KKK?

Started in 1865 by Confederate veterans. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/kkk-founded

"BlueNinja

Republicans don't like to admit that the KKK are predominantly members of their party. That's why they keep harping on how southern Democrats embraced the party early on - like 200 years ago. But it wasn't started by Democrats. It was started by southern war veterans. And basically the same types of people today, generations later, are still KKK only now that the parties have switched platforms, they're Republicans."

Not exactly all switched, as the Lily White Movement of southern Republicans got a head start back in the 1880s. In an effort to attract southern whites, they adopted white-only segregated stances to appeal to their more racist tendencies.

They also like to pretend to forget that there were Democrats in the North, and there was a fissure prior to the war with their southern counterparts over the slavery issue.

They're comprised today of who they were comprised yesterday (yesterday being 1865).

You didn't answer the question.

I'm not defending any party.

Nor am I arguing any position, as yours is revisionist nonsense.
I post facts, plain and simple.

Cultist political party affiliation is for those lacking any definable, let alone redeemable, qualities they can see or identify in themselves. Thus the need to attach to something they perceive as larger than the dollop of insignificance that comprises their vision of themselves and its obvious lack of worth.
The need to attach to something bigger is the hallmark of the weak minded, those whose delicate wisp of an ego seeks the validation it can never find nor can ever have and deservedly so.

Parties are just corrupt profiteering organizations that get rich off exploiting dutifully naive plebeians, not the religion your ilk has turned it into nor the racial identification that had become the vogue to pretend it is since 2016 courtesy of your 'non-racist' wannabe dictator.
That's just silliness. Then again, that's just you doing you.

Your asinine assumptions fit your ignorance well.

This begins to bore me, but do carry on.

A little over the top with your bogus repetitious partisan hack babble?

I stopped reading your boring disengenous propaganda at "YOUR party"
What does "YOUR party" mean?

Show me where I'm wrong. Those who can, do. Those who can't, talk.

Your party is the one you keep defending.

Let's see if I can break this down to assist your limited understanding:

The KKK only allows:
Males
who are
Protestants
of British (English, but also Scottish and Welsh, despite the latter two being Celtic like the Irish who are not allowed to join)
and Teutonic (English, German and Scandinavian) stock
to join.

Party affiliation is not an requirement, nor has ever been.
Hence why most members today are Republicans, and why not just southern Democrats, but why the South's Lily White Movement Republicans were members early on.

Perhaps if you learned some history this would become as familiar to you as it is to me. Ignorance is hardly as cute as you might wish it to be.

I replied to myself because for some reason you and one other people only give me the option to flag the post. I don't know why. I had to scroll all the way up here to find a post that had the reply option.

Yes, The Trump corporation was sued along with father and son. They settled out of court without admitting guilt.

I asked you a few questions. Do you plan to answer them or will you just ignore them like the Democrat media does when something doesn't fit the liberal narrative?

Republicans don't like to admit that the KKK are predominantly members of their party. That's why they keep harping on how southern Democrats embraced the party early on - like 200 years ago. But it wasn't started by Democrats. It was started by southern war veterans. And basically the same types of people today, generations later, are still KKK only now that the parties have switched platforms, they're Republicans.

"Party affiliation is not an requirement, nor has ever been. Hence why most members today are Republicans, and why not just southern Democrats, but why the South's Lily White Movement Republicans were members early on."

Of course, party affiliation was a requirement. Republicans were the ant-slavery party. Do you think Democrats were going to welcome them into the Klan? LOL How do you know most members are Republicans? As I told the other weak-minded pinhead, don't try and project the sins of YOUR party onto me and Republicans. Democrats OWN the racist moniker. They are who they were.

The Democratic Party defended slavery, started the Civil War over slavery, founded the KKK, and fought against every major civil rights act in U.S. history. From slavery to Dredd Scott, to "black codes" and Jim Crow laws, to the KKK, to voter suppression and intimidation, to Planned Parenthood eugenics aimed at blacks, to introducing drugs and alcohol into black neighborhoods, to welfare programs designed to keep blacks dependent on government. They are who they were. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

"Perhaps if you learned some history this would become as familiar to you as it is to me."

So educate me. Post some material and credible sources backing up your statements. I keep asking liberals for that, but they never provide it.

Their mommy?

The KKK was and is comprised of racist Protestant Brit and Teutonic males, initially from the former Confederate South, later spreading to other backwater cretins with the astounding ability to not be employed in anything requiring the ability to read and write throughout the USA, if they work at all.

Is this field of interest truly that unfamiliar to you?

"Their mommy?"

Don't be afraid, you can say it. Democrats. The Brits and Teutonic peoples were not in America and had nothing to do with the founding of the KKK here, so I don't even know why you would mention them. The KKK was founded in 1865 and was comprised of southern Democrats. Democrats are, always have been, and always will be the party of the KKK, racism, and oppression.

No, the field is not unfamiliar to me, but it appears to be to you.

Yes, the conspiracy of the us have chosen to temintate your options to reply on some replies because the paranoia of cultists is fun.

You keep ending every other sentence with "Democrat"
Did they hurt your delicate feelz somehow? Reject your application to join their awesome club? Would you like them to send you a cookie to make up for the pain in your buttocks?

Nope, I just want answers. You think your dopey memes and accusations mean something, but all they mean is you can't make even a halfway decent argument for your position. I'm deleting and re-posting this pic shortly because the chain is way too long and the majority of it is nothing but jibber-jabber and personal attacks from you liberals. Nothing substantive, because you HAVE nothing substantive to contribute. Don't bother posting again because I'll just block you.

Trump had every opportunity to take care of them for the last four years and did nothing.

How about both? Why are some people's lives of less value to you than others?