if the fraud was so clear to you, what exactly do you need an investigation for? either you have the evidence or you don't. if you don't have it, how do you justify an investigation? this is the embarrassing situation that Trump was in when he went to the Supreme Court. he couldn't justify a hearing of evidence that he didn't have. this means what he has is a claim, a suspicion, which counts for nothing in court. nod your head if you understand.