CNN celebrated riots in 2020. What makes 2021 objectionable to CNN?

Let's not forget this salient fact...

20f68v.jpg (click to show) Upvoted!

"Ritos happened over the injustice of police murder. What makes a mob that can't accept a fair election result so objectionable?"

Except, they don't believe the results are fair and that blatant and intentional fraud occured.
Many people don't believe the police committed murder (many say George Floyd died of a fentanyl overdose).
BLM burned and looted businesses that had nothing to do with alleged police violence.
The Capitol building and the politicians were complicit in the alleged fraud (if it happened).
One protest was actually more appropriate for the alleged complaint.

One additional comment about BLM and AntiF(irst)A(mendment) is that they burned and looted not just businesses, but also GOVT. buildings as well, particularly inside the chad / chaz zone in Seattle.

But that's okay with progressive snowflake liberals, because... well, orangemanbad. That's they're excuse for every lawless and destructive thing they did last summer.

Except, it wasn't a fair election, scommie.

you are Every judge all the way to SCOTUS rejected Trumps crack legal teams arguments. Judges appointed by Trump and even Barr rejected it.

So rather than accept that you simply create more conspiracies about how they were all just "deep state" and hate Trump

The massively glaring flaw of this is that Trump hired and appointed them so I would enjoy hearing you claw your way out that fact

Show me where all/each of those courts heard all of the evidence and refuted every piece of evidence, that was presented in detail at the State Representative Hearings?

I'll give you 2 days.

I do not need two days lol Trumps crack seal team 6 legal team presented their evidence and the over 70 judges threw it out.

I know I know you will claim they just hate America and Trump.

I watched the hearings. I watched people make claims with not factual evidence. Just their opinions.

You may not know this but while a "sworn affidavit" is a "form" of evidence it is not enough to bring a case to trial

People who sign them can simply be mistaken about what they believe they witnessed a crime and so on. And that is why they got tossed they were not credible enough

To convict someone who signed a sworn affidavit the court would have to prove intent that person purposefully and intended to lie. That's how that works.

If all someone had to do is scribble their names on paper we would all be in prison lol

There was credible evidence brought to the hearings, you're blind, don't comment to me until you re-examine your MSM-cult-beliefs.

You can believe what ever you like go for it. But it's done all the judges tossed it all. Your entire belief is based on discredited information. And rather than just accept Trump lost you cling to more and more conspiracy theories.

You might enjoy a You Tube channel called "Finance Hub"

The pimple faced virgin loves making up conspiracies about how Trump "even now" can win.

His latest insanity is about Trump is responsible for all the NG in DC and at the right time he's going to sign the insurrection act and turn them lose on Congress lol

Show me where anyone reviewed all the ENTIRE details, and then debunked the ENTIRETY and every detail, of election fraud. I'll wait.

I don't need to lol I am not the one who debunked them. Ask them about it. I'm betting good money they will laugh you away like Trumps crack legal teams.

You choose to believe Trump go for it. I'll choose to believe all the judges who have seen and dismissed the cases.

Ah, so you can deny actual evidence of fraud and just choose not to look at the evidence, then if you say it's been debunked (when you haven't even looked into it, yourself) you claim you don't need to prove your claim of "debunked".

Such consistency. It's not about believing Trump, it's about examining the actual evidence from Americans, including Democrat whistleblowers.

You choose to believe all the judges that DIDN'T hear the cases? K. Clown.

And called their evidence "heresay." HERESAY.

Show me where all of the evidence was heard in the court cases?

Is that regular Ritos, spicy or the scoops?

lol

All riots are wrong. End of story.

Show me where it says it's a protest when they build a gallows outside then storm the place with zip ties chanting Kill Mike Pence!

Are they just gonna hug it out if they meet in the hall?

As you ignore everything that Antifa/BLM ever did...

show me where they set up a gallows and chanted about killing the Vice President of the United States.

Show me where they tried to overturn an election through violence.

Show me.

Show me your claim of gallows

They were chanting hang mike pence.

Funny how your eyesight is as selectiveas your indignation. Your hypocritical outrage is noted. Notice in these photos the noise has a representative effigy in them. Sit down faker.

Hanging in effigy is a political protest theatric. Unpleasant? Yes. Uncalled for? Yep.

Did they proceed to invade his residence while chanting KILL HIM!, did they?

Did they bring restraints while dressed in tactical gear?

No. No, they didn't.

Did they kill one of the cops trying to stop them from getting into the building?

Being a jackass and hanging someone in effigy is not anywhere in the same order of magnitude as actually breaking in to a building while chanting how you're gonna kill someone while a gallows is being constructed outside.

So protest crowd chants are to taken literally now. Want a review of the chants of leftists rioters and protestors? Here’s just one “pigs in the blanket, fry em like bacon” while attacking and injuring police officers?

You mean like,” pigs in the blanket, fry’em like bacon” what were the Lafayette park White House protestors chanting?

Like chanting “pigs in the blanket, fry’em like bacon?” And then attacking police?

"Show me where they tried to overturn an election through violence." --- The last 3 years, following the Trump administration from the start, via big-tech, MSM, and politicians calling for violence, and then Antifa/BLM acting it out.

And that's not storming a capitol building with weapons and retraints while they were finishing the election process.

I guess we will never know, will we.

I don't answer to him, and he does not answer to me, why don't you ask him who he is, and where he came from, do some actual investigation before you question ME(that has nothing to do with that man)

He's been identified and arrested: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/01/10/eric-munchel-arrested-reportedly-zip-tie-guy-senate-during-riots/6618314002/

"He's been identified and arrested" --- Again, try maintaining reading comprehension. I do NOT answer to him, and he does NOT answer to me, why don't you ask him who he is, and where he came from, do some actual investigation before you question ME(that has nothing to do with that man)

Democrats held hearings and impeached Trump the way they're supposed to. The riots and protests started separate from that but being president, Trump bears responsibility. He could've tried to speak to the people instead of getting the military to shoot and abduct them. He never once tried diplomacy. He was president. Just another in a long line of failures.

Try to address my points, directly.

The last 3 years, following the Trump administration from the start, via big-tech, MSM, and politicians calling for violence, and then Antifa/BLM acting it out.

How about 2 Guillotines?

This was neither Antifa nor BLM. Nor did they chant for his death. Nor did they storm into his house while he was there (this is a house he owns in DC. He lives in Washington State).

A threat is threat.

And both sides do it.

No, they don't. Only the Antifa/BLM do particular things that they do, like infiltration that the US capitol rally.

No. They don't. Only one side threatens then carries out a violent coup attempt.

Antifa/BLM.

Didn't threaten public officials. Didn't kick in the doors to capture and possibly kill public officials. Didn't threaten all of that because of an election they didn't like.

Antifa and BLM murdered federal officer Dave Patrick Underwood.
https://i.imgflip.com/4tlu6p.jpg

Bull. Leftists/MSM have incited violence/riots nearly all year in 2020. https://youtu.be/1l4498GnmHk

norsegreen0 ups, 1h
Antifa and BLM murdered federal officer Dave Patrick Underwood.

No, they didn't. That was two Boogaloo Boys. https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/06/29/federal-grand-jury-returns-indictment-against-ca-men-accused-of-murdering-federal-officer-after-meeting-on-boogaloo-facebook-group/