yep

It's revealed now. It's just those in power want to make sure the threshold of believablity is never met.

Have you ever met a Democrat?

Then you may be aware of how purposely un-aware they can be.

Right, that's why Trump lost every lawsuit.

Yes, because the courts are filled with cowards that like having a job, cronies that get bought off and activists who's sole purpose in life is to destroy America.

"Yes, because the courts are filled with cowards that like having a job"

you do know a president can't really kick a judge off, right?

Blackmail is a thing. Assassination is a thing. Smear campaigns are a thing.

imagine all 3 of trump's judges having those. just because they're appointed by trump doesn't mean they're loyal

"cowards that like having a job"
You know that judge's can't just be fired, right?
And you know that several of these judges are not only Republican appointed, but Trump appointed.

Blackmail is a thing. Assassination is a thing. Smear campaigns are a thing.

Still no evidence. They did their job.

No fraud to reveal.

It's easier to see if you take the blinders off silly.

they are non partisan tho

Oh I'm sorry for not speaking in complete sentences, even though this is just a meme site. What I was trying to say was that the poll observers were non partisan, and they didn't "cheat" like you assumed they did just because the candidate you rooted for didn't win.

The poll workers were able to determine that the ballots were legitimate.

the standard of what is legal and what is not illegal was changed by the Pennsylvania SOS without authorization from the Pennsylvania legislator, she did not have that authority.

It would be a complete waste of time and money. Y'all couldn't even find one fraudulent vote in 50 lawsuits. 50 lawsuits and not one vote was ruled as fraud. Not one.

So would 3 years and many millions of dollars on a russia hoax.

The Russia investigations turned a profit from seizing assets from the people who were guilty.

where are we seeing these profits? I didn't see them.

I can't help it if you don't keep up with the developments of the case.

Sources please.

Democrats never need sources for their claims. They are to be believed without question.

So your approach to these investigations thesis, is to hope that they can nab people for non-related crimes and seize their assets, in the hopes of turning a profit?

That's now how America works. But that's how liberal thinking works. Pretty sad.

Fake news again.

Facts.

If we can afford to spend 3 years and $43,000,000 on an investigation about Russia based entirely on made-up claims and anonymous sources, we can spend a week auditing a pile of ballots in a few select states...

"A few select states"...you mean only states Trump lost, right? XD

a few states Democrats put all their effort into manufacturing ballots for. Enough to overturn the election for them.

No they didn't.

Because unless you get a democrat's signed confession saying they did do that you won't be open to any skepticism what so ever.

The burden of proof isn't on me. It's on the accusers.

The Russia investigation, of course, turned a noteable profit after assets seized by people who were, ya know... guilty.

So an investigation based on heresay led to positive results.... ok great, well then we can have one too! Thanks for agreeing.

See, maybe instead of being snarky about it, you could actually study it to see what a real case that leads to a string of indictments and an impeachment looks like. 50 lawsuits and not one vote has been ruled as fraudulent. Ruling after ruling after ruling has admonished RNC lawyers for failing to back any of their claims up with evidence. This is pathetic. You lose. You get nothing.

You are talking to a two year old.

Ih many votes were found to be fraudulent in many of those cases, just not enough to swing the election. Please stop spreading fake news.

Not one judge has ruled a single vote as fraudulent. That is a fact. 50 lawsuits and not one vote struck down.

Guilty of what? Collusion?

eyyy i'm guessing this is the response to trump's $3 million for a recount.