Imgflip Logo Icon

I guess the Postal Service's database-tied OCR ballot grabbers worked after all! Very sneaky. "Biden victory" my @$$.

I guess the Postal Service's database-tied OCR ballot grabbers worked after all! Very sneaky.  "Biden victory" my @$$. | BULLDOZER DRIVER AND COWORKERS FIND TRUMP BALLOTS IN LANDFILL.  ORDERED TO KEEP SILENT AND KEEP BURYING. Deep State controlled media:  
"thEre'S no EviDEnCe of eLeCtiON fraUd 
aNYwhereE at aLL!" | image tagged in memes,mocking spongebob,election fraud,joe biden,donald trump 2020,ballot theft | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2,651 views 78 upvotes Made by CR01 4 years ago in politics
106 Comments
6 ups, 4y
[deleted]
4 ups, 4y,
2 replies
If the democrats had stolen the election Mitch Mcconnell wouldn't have won. Just saying.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
It's a multipronged strategy on multiple fronts. I think the software element was key, but the USPS OCR ballot pullers may prove to have been more important. We may yet find out.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Hunger Games - Caesar Flickerman (Stanley Tucci) | GOOD THING THOSE 007 DEEP STATE LANDFILL DUMPERS DIDN'T BURN THOSE BALLOTS AND INSTEAD JUST LEFT THEM IN THE OPEN WHERE THEY COULD BE FOUND! | image tagged in hunger games - caesar flickerman stanley tucci | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
0 ups, 4y
Not everyone wants to go dig through stinky garbage bags and rusty microwaves.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
How does another office determine if they stole the presidential election?
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Why the heck would we steal just one race?
0 ups, 4y
Because DJT is the most direct threat to the swamp and therefore the race they care the most about.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y
These are the reasons I'm republican:)
1 up, 4y
Who are these people that have smart phones with cameras from the late 90's?

How is it they repeatedly have smudged up lens and low-rez photos?

I mean, if I found evidence of voter fraud, I'D TAKE MY TIME AND CLEAN THE DAMN LENS to make sure everyone could see it very very very clearly.

And then I'd contact the authorities and as many journalists as I could find.

If you want to watch the video, search for this code in Youtube: gidyrsopb1c

But he never identifies what state/city he's in. He goes off camera after tearing at an envelope for A LONG TIME. Then shows up with an unreadable form.

then says that's not the only one.

How did he know that was a trump one ahead of filming?
If he didn't know, how many did he go through opening them up before finding a trump one?
How much downtime does this guy have that he can dig through the trash all day?
Why didn't he show us the piles upon piles of votes thrown away that he's finding?

OR

Is it more likely that he requested a mail in ballot. Marked it Trump. Sealed it up. Carried it to work. Made sure his camera was nice and smudgey. Opened it up. showed it. And claimed he was finding bunches and bunches of these?

Because that seems way more likely.
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
5 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Nope. Verified facts now.
2 ups, 4y
Verified by whom?
2 ups, 4y
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
This bottle of Republican Tears is going to be an excellent vintage, notice the aroma of denial with the bittersweet taste of double standards... *chefs kiss*
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Good. We can see who's uncorking in January.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
I'll get the olives <3
0 ups, 4y
P.s. Don't miss my latest "denial" too at imgflip.com/i/4mcico
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
3 replies
(Actual transcript)
The latest, from a Pennsylvania court:
Judge: “Are you claiming there there is any fraud..?”
Trump lawyer: “To my knowledge, at present, no.”
Judge: “Are you claiming that there is any undue or improper influence upon the elector...?”
Trump lawyer: “To my knowledge, at present, no.”
4 ups, 4y,
2 replies
LOL, I already addressed that being a motion about procedural issues counting ballots, not fraud. You are fake news.
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
3 replies
GOTCHA-before you deleted it 😉

Here is an actual fact check.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ballots-california-landfill/

“However, the items shown in the photographs were not ballots, were not from 2020, and were not illegally discarded. As the County of Sonoma verified via social media, the pictured items were merely empty envelopes from the November 2018 election that had been disposed of as allowed by law”
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
And in California, of all states. Must be fake news.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
0 ups, 4y
Not sure what any of this has to do with not recycling envelopes. But if it makes you feel better about our new president, go for it. We’ll all need to find a way to cope.
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
I deleted it because I got a fact check of a different claim. I do not know of an actual fact check of this video.
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Sure..ignore the main point that is more proof of debunked fraud
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
I addressed that point. This claim has not actually been debunked.
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
This specific landfill claim. I got a debunking of a similar claim so I'd put in the unproved category until this one is addressed.
[deleted]
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
No, that’s not how it works? That’s a fallacy.

Again, when you make a wild claim, the burden of proof is on you to prove that it is true, the burden isn’t on the accused to prove that it is NOT true.

It’s not “unproven”. There’s NO proof being presented that it IS true.

I get you are just a kid. Do funner things with your time, like playing Super Smash Bros.
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
LOL, pretending to know things that are false to justify your opinion now?

Unproved is a category where you have no proof something is true or false. Is is separate from proved or disproved that each require evidence to make such claims. So you basically you got what I mean completely wrong and attack me for your own misconception.
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
So why haven't the fact checkers put a marker on every post that says Biden is the president elect? That is fake as fake news can be as an outright lie.
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Because we elected him. It's on Trump to prove that we haven't.
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Ok sure, thanks for your input President Elect Antithesis.
2 ups, 4y
Pretty sure election officials can verify whether or not Biden, Trump, or Antithesis won... and it’s Biden.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
He opened it up and stated what was on the ballot.

Snopes lied about the dumpster ballots too, and their "fake news" claim got handed back to them.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Link? From a reputable source too (not Newsmax or another rightist propaganda depot).
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
I'll let you see the photographic evidence. They kind of take things down most other places, and I'm not taking the time:

[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
Again....a link? From a reputable source too (not Newsmax or another rightist propaganda depot).
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Will ya take the time for a little reality dose????

HEADLINE- Georgia confirms Biden victory and finds no widespread fraud after statewide audit

Georgia has finished its statewide audit, lead mostly by Republicans, of the razor-thin presidential race and President-elect Joe Biden defeated President Donald Trump, according to a news release from the Secretary of State's office.

Biden beat Trump by 12,284 votes, according to the final results from the audit. This is a slight drop for Biden compared to the pre-audit results.

Officials have said repeatedly that the audit confirmed there was no widespread fraud or irregularities in the election.

Times up
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Time will be up in the tail end of January.

Officials frequently include the participant in the offenses. Sort of like "I am not a crook."

I argue there's been more going on you will never hear about on CNN or MSDNC. We'll see.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
That tinfoil hat is getting too tight on your pinhead, cutting off blood to that pee-brain.

Come up with better conspiracy theories, nutjob.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Ah, the eloquence of liberal logic.

The naivete that blindly trusts whatever party line gets narrated on the TV screen.

And the lack of brainpower to grasp a plain English expression like that first line.

K.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
Find Bigfoot yet? Tinfoil poisoning?
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
You already addressed it? Or, you’re Trump’s lawyers? 🤣

No, these Judges are asking a direct question to Trump’s REAL lawyers.

Judge: “Let me ask the question directly then - are you claiming that there is any undue or improper influence upon the elector...?”
Trump lawyer: “No,”
Judge: “Do you have any evidence to corroborate allegations of fraud..?”
Trump lawyer: “No,”

Karl Rove is as Republican as you can get, and even he concedes that Trump won’t overturn sh*t:
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2020-election-result-overturned-karl-rove.amp
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
I already showed your wrong when you listed the source so I could look it up. Notice here you didn't address my point at all and tried an appeal to irrelevant authority.
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
LOL, so now your trying the fallacy of the lonely fact. You're also still lying about the context of the question so you can pretend something was said that was not.

Here is the source: https://www.democracydocket.com/cases/montgomery-county-board-of-elections-vote-count/
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Not really. You are using your fake fallacy speak as a lame red herring. Which is guess what? A fallacy. The burden of proof is on you accusers, not the other way around, which is guess what? Another fallacy.

You don’t have real evidence. Until you do, and it’s properly shown in a court of law, there’s nothing to discuss. This isn’t high school debate, fallacy boi.
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
LOL, you made a false claim you need to prove that claim. You failed to do so an used two fallacies to back it up, and now are trying the good old NO! U! response and moving goal posts and appealing to ridicule to boot.
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Lol..What false claim, kid?

FACT- Judges in multiple case are asking if their is fraud or malice, and Trump lawyers are answering, No.

FACT- Judges are throwing out evidence in all these cases because the affidavits and witnesses are proving to be flimsy and unreliable.

FACT- The Judges are threatening sanctions for vexatious litigation.

Whatever esoteric point you think you are winning on, you will have to clarify. Again, you are treating this as a high school debate where a court of law is more thoughtful and organic. Ask your high school debate coach what he thinks of your amazing argument, kid. I’m not your teacher.
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
First fact, You're only citation id a proceeded issue that the lawyers are arguing and you're pretending that the question is in reference in fraud overall. Your argument was shown to be false dur to you changing the context.

Second fact, No citations provided

Third fact, No citations provided

[deleted]
3 ups, 4y
Um, I’m just saying there is no voters fraud and no real evidence for it.

Even Trump’s lawyers agree there’s no fraud.

Again, when making a wild claim, the burden of proof is on you to prove it is true. UFOs, Bigfoot, voter fraud... any conspiracy theory requires serious evidence.

What you are saying is that the accused have to prove it’s not true otherwise we have treat it with undue weight.

You are engaging in is what is called a false equivalence fallacy- a classic tactic by Trump and his cult.

How’s that for a fallacy, fallacy boi? 😂🤣😎
3 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Well I see you're gone full on lie mode.
" I’m just saying there is no voters fraud and no real evidence for it."
That is factually incorrect. We have yet to see wide evidence of of fraud, instances of it have been proved and will happen in every election o this size.

"Even Trump’s lawyers agree there’s no fraud."
No, they didn't. you took a comment out of context and then lied about it.

"What you are saying is that the accused have to prove it’s not true otherwise we have treat it with undue weight."
No I haven't rather you lied abut me because it is easier to beat a strawman than actually listen

"You are engaging in is what is called a false equivalence fallacy- a classic tactic by Trump and his cult."
I have not compared two subjects here, so that is not even possible for me to commit that fallacy here.
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
td(ishonest);dc
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
OK Boomer.
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
2 replies
I’m far from being a boomer, kid. But math isn’t your strong suit, is it? Not if you believe Biden didn’t win the most votes.
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
OK Boomer.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Ad hominem abusive
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
Yes, you are
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Hey..lookie here.

Rest of the media is calling Arizona for Biden, with ALL the legal votes. First time a dem has done that in years.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/12/politics/biden-wins-arizona/index.html

Things just keep looking up for you, sore losers.

How’s that fraud case working out for you guys?
4 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Why are you so worried about fraud claims? If there’s no fraud then you have nothing to worry about
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
You should always take seriously dangerous lying politicians when they are trying to steal the election and then blame the victims for it.

They are attacking America, there would be something wrong with me if I didn’t give a shit
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Attacking an election likely riddled with fraud is American. Free fair elections are the cornerstone of it. If it was that then the system will play out that way. Trying to obstruct or hide such inquiry is strange for someone who says the process is infallible. This election is rife with fraud. Whether it’s enough to overturn it will be seen. If Trump won you would be doing exactly the same thing hypocrite. “Biden should not concede under any circumstances” remember that?
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Unlikely you mean. Go check out what the Department of Homeland Security had to say about this election in regards to fraud. The results will be a pleasant surprise.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
No I believe it is highly likely. I see what CISA said so they believes no cyber security issues existed. We will see, it still has to play out.
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
You keep waiting. I suppose I like you waiting rather than in the streets killing people because you don’t agree with them.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Biden supports wildly unChristian actions, like transgender people playing in their “new identity’s” sports, and abortion.

I don’t believe we should respond to the left with the violence and hate they treat us with. And they villainize us a whole lot more than we do them. Some people will want to fight to defend their rights, but convincing people is a better method. I can understand why some might give up on it, but it’s still the best option. If they try to harm us or do anything ridiculous like AOC suggested this month, I think we should defend ourselves, but not be attackers. The world’s a crazy place now.

I get disturbed when people suggest Trump is the reason we feel the way we do about Democrats and the media. I’ve known the media was biased for a long long time. Ever since they discovered the Hittites, proving the Bible was right about something people doubted, and the media glossed over it completely. They glossed over when Bill Clinton assaulted someone because they wanted him in office so badly. I don’t even know where that accusation came from, but I have a feeling it’s due to the many converts from the Democrat to the Republican Party during Trump’s tenure. And to be honest, Trump is the biggest proof we’ve had that the media is full of crap. Many of the problems people have with Trump are straight up lies. Like the disabled reporter. What Trump was doing to mock him is what he’s done when mocking people for lying for the last 10 years. But the media had an excuse to victimize the guy since he was disabled.

I also had problems with the Democrat Party before I even knew who Trump was. (Besides some businessman, of course). Like them pretending to stand for racial equality while simultaneously talking down on them, saying things like “We’ll have those n****as voting democrat for two centuries,” or Hillary Clinton in 2009 saying Margaret Sanger (someone who wanted black people to be sterilized and was an actual racist) was someone she looked up to for her beliefs, what she stood for, and what she did with the country. Not to mention the similarities with Marxism (hence why we’ve had Democrats openly admit to be Marxist). And I made that equation long before I even had political discussions with people, just because i read about Marxism at age 9 and also happened to stumble upon the Republican and Democrat ideals as well. I could go on and on about this.
1 up, 4y
Just because you have a long history of not trusting the media doesn’t invalidate the fact that Biden won.
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
It may come to that but it will be mutual. The left has shown their propensity for violence when they don’t get their way, I see no reason we can’t do the same thing. We don’t believe we are any better but we are equal. Fire with fire. Eye for an eye.
1 up, 4y
Where do I say I’m going out hunting? It may come to civil war as there is no longer common ground. I have not promoted deathsquads or hunting civilians who “disagree” I am prepared to fight and hold my city, town, state and country. I will not be intimidated, I will not allow my decency to be used against me to get advantage. The point of talking is to achieve agreement to disagree or achieve common ground. This appears less likely as there is no interest for it on the left. They are the ones making lists, they are the ones saying if you don’t agree we can’t be friends and have nothing to talk about. Ok, I’m down with that. If it requires revolution then that’s what it requires. Those I fight will be looking for it, not innocents. Once again F**k Trump, it ain’t about Trump. It’s about America and Freedom. It’s not the right that radicalized us, it’s the left.
1 up, 4y
No, if you’re going out looking to kill people who just disagree with you, then that’s not self defense. And an eye for an eye is not the Christian way either...

In Matthew (5:38-42) Jesus said, "Ye have heard that it hath been said, an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth. But I say unto you, that ye resist not evil but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also. And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain. Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away. If anyone forces you to go one mile, go with them two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.”

You could’ve said that you will defend your home or fight only if necessary. Instead you openly admit to kill other Americans for simply disagreeing with you.

If you do this, you become the enemy and traitors that Trump and his supporters have so long poisoned you into believing the Democrats are.

You should be ashamed.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
I’m more worried about people who believe it. So far, as has been reported by every news source, these claims of fraud are either misrepresentations or our right bogus. Do you really think Trump would hire lawyers to file lawsuits against the states and not present this as evidence? Don’t you trust the President to do the right thing?
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
I think it’s naive to believe the left won’t cheat or that they didn’t. The mail in ballots, the extensions to voting to allow more time to make up differences with fraud. This is the first election using mass mailed ballots that are rife with fraud potential and are not allowed in most countries for the same reason. Democrats pushed for it because they needed to have a way to put the fix in. I don’t believe the Republicans picked up seats and held the senate and lost the presidency. Sorry, something doesn’t fit. I will wait and see. If there is nothing more than a few sworn affidavits and nothing else then I will get to be the opposition to Biden’s move to socialize the country.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
I think it’s naive that Trump lost due to fraud. The number of errors and irregularities, which have been caught and already reversed have been taken into the final count. That there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud by not just the individual election offices nor the Department of Homeland Security.

You don’t know anyone who does not vote along party lines? Sure, you probably live in a non-swing state but if you can’t even consider that as an explanation, how am I suppose to consider your explanation? It doesn’t fit to you because you don’t want it to fit. Just as Hillary voters didn’t want it and I’ll admit, a great many of them proved themselves to be sore losers. And Trump Supporters were sore winners. Liberal tears? Please. If Obama did then what Trump is doing now, you wouldn’t be outraged? You wouldn’t be calling him a tyrant? Even Trump said the 2016 election was rigged and wanted it investigated. Obama still managed a peaceful transition amid these claims of voter fraud. Now with the shoe on the other foot.

And once again, Democrats chose Biden because he was the most moderate choice in the primaries. They had a choice between 8 some odd socialist democrats and they still chose Biden who was not among them. And you’re still claiming Biden is a socialist?

You’ve been fed lies and grown foolish and stubborn on them.
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Maybe, but the accusations need to be addressed and exhausted. I no longer have confidence in anything the Government or Media says. I have never been a believe it because we report it person but recent examples of blatant anti conservative bias is a primary reason. I believe there are elements of the government that don’t want change and want to keep their cushy lobbying relationships in hand to the detriment of the people. I don’t trust them. I have witnessed a few elections none were as suspicious as this one. Mass mailed ballots and count stops at key times are fishy. If no evidence or insufficient evidence is found I will abide by the electoral College vote but I will never believe this election wasn’t rife with fraud.
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
You’ve already admitted to wishing Americans dead. We have nothing more to discuss, you fascist pig.
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Let’s get some things straight. I don’t care if you hate me. I never said anything about going out to kill people for disagreeing with me, so I don’t even know what you are talking about. I said the left had shown a propensity for violence and I saw no reason the right couldn’t do the same. Rioting, destroying statues, looting. Somehow that’s not noble if it is the right but a noble pursuit for those on the left.

I have been called racist, Nazi, fascist, and everything else by leftists in here so these terms mean nothing. What is tragic is that they use these terms so lightly to the point they mean nothing.

I have seen real facism and totalitarian communism and support neither. When you start talking about making lists of political enemies as the democrats have called for and infer that you may not be employable for your political beliefs, as the leftist media has inferred. Then we might as well fight because we are no longer America. I will fight to defend or restore it. Taking life is profound, it forever changes a man. You stain your soul forever. Most people with a conscious get sick the first time. It is not glamorous or noble.

War is always fought by people who disagree with each other. The leftists on here promoted revolution and characterized their riots as the Boston Tea Party Equivalent of the revolution. Sometimes revolution is met by counter revolution. Several here celebrated the killing and beating of people for political beliefs or wearing a red hat. Or simply for dying with the wrong political beliefs Never any outrage for that huh? So spare me the fascist sermon.

I am watching and waiting. I don’t know what is going to happen. If I choose to fight it will be against people who are looking for a fight and it is usually referred to as civil
War.

Enjoy your life, I will mine
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Lol that’s too bad, you were one of my favorite leftists. You could discuss issues without devolving into name calling, but in the end you show your true colors. So I call you a useful idiot and Stalinist worm. I guess we are even. as enjoy your evening.
0 ups, 4y
Not a lefty.

I voted Republican locally as they encouraged mask mandates and closed businesses down. Somehow they did not come under much ire except by the die hard Trump Supporters.

My county overwhelmingly voted blue for Biden. A first in a decade. Not that it mattered to the rest of the state.

You showed your true colors when you say you’re perfectly comfortable with killing Americans and not in self-defense. This does not make you a Republican but no different than the brown shirts my family tried to flee from in Germany.

Your kind have always disgusted me. You claim you left the Democratic Party for not adhering to the First Amendment but have no issue killing Americans for simply disagreeing with you. That makes you a fascist.

Until you admit that that is wrong then we have nothing more to discuss. It is a waste of both of our time.

I can stand anyone but I cannot abide by fascists. I cannot help but spit on them. But I will pray you see the error of your ways before you realize it’s too late to be more than just a decent American but a decent human being.
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Nice red herring.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
No, that would be the unconfirmed reports of fraud.
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
And here we have the NO! U! response.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
What am I suppose to do exactly? You’re ignoring facts but believing any unconfirmed story you can grasp at. Just accept your loss or continue taking after the President and denying reality. First about COVID and now the election.
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Incorrect, I said it is unproved without evidence. Are you confusing me with someone else?
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
You called Biden’s victory in Arizona a red herring.

I said the unconfirmed fraud is the red herring.

Errors and irregularities are not necessarily proof of fraud.
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
You're using the term red herring wrong.
0 ups, 4y
No, I think it’s perfect, actually. Red Herrings are distractions. Every lie out of this administration, including these supposed reports of voter fraud, are mere distractions from the truth of whatever Trump is trying to sloppily cover up. In this instance, the fact that Biden won.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
It gets better! Did you read the part where the lawyer praises the DNC for acting in good faith?
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
I did.

Because Trump's lawyers don't want to lose their license lying for Trump.

See on Friday breaking news that law firms are starting to fight Trump?

They are now putting Rudy in charge. Legally-speaking, that's like upgrading from your iPhone 12 to a Nokia 3310.

#Tiredofallthiswinning
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Rudy is just the worst lawyer ever.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y
Taking bets on when he gets sanctioned by the courts
Show More Comments
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • trump ballots found in landfill.jpg
  • Mocking Spongebob
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    BULLDOZER DRIVER AND COWORKERS FIND TRUMP BALLOTS IN LANDFILL. ORDERED TO KEEP SILENT AND KEEP BURYING. Deep State controlled media: "thEre'S no EviDEnCe of eLeCtiON fraUd aNYwhereE at aLL!"