Creepy Condescending Wonka

The left wants one thought process and all others are vilified, silenced, and supporters disposed of. They have succeeded on the first two steps. Harris’ presidential win now starts the final solution.

If I may, Obama did not jail journalists. He conducted intrusive investigations that undermined the integrity of the Press and the right to protect their sources. Though many records and information was seized, I cannot find anything conclusive that proves that journalists went to jail. And unless you have more, I'm afraid I'll have to call bullshit.

Here is the full quote.

“You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right?” Clinton said. “The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic—you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up.”

She said the other half of Trump’s supporters “feel that the government has let them down” and are “desperate for change.”

“Those are people we have to understand and empathize with as well,” she said.

So, I guess there are good people.

On both sides.

So, in a way, she was actually saying Trump was right.

imgflip.com/i/3xm4qv

Your claim has been debunked. 😁

Hey, to be fair. Trump Supporters were crying and acting like children. If they didn’t want to be made fun of for their reaction, they could complain about politics and not someone’s food preference in a crisis.

Not a leftist tho. Trump lost me when reports came in of not paying his workers and he continued to do this at the rallies he threw.

My main bafflement with Trump Supporters is why they still feel the need to support him when most of the criticism against him is justified. Especially as he undermines our country’s most sacred institutions just to keep more power.

Not at all. I am often wrong. I’m fact when I study human behavior and statistics; I’m able to perceptively guess very well how someone might act or how an event plays out. There are advantages to being educated, after all. As well as advantages to continuing your education even as late in life as I am.

You can be intelligent and not possess a lick of education. And an educated person can still e quite ignorant. The difference is the resources under the educated person. Especially if they bothered to hold on to what they were taught and did not simply regurgitate it.

I would say I am currently aligned with the Democrats current properties but I disagree with their methods. Prioritizing healthcare, education, and the environment are three most important issues and for all the Dems failings, and disagreements, they’re on the right track. I don’t think the answer is socialism nor do I agree that privatizing these things to be the solution either.

But we always talk about what I am. Never you. And quite frankly what I am should be about as relevant as what you are. I refuse to label people. If I’m not mistaken, you yourself recently said to someone...

“We’re more than just the labels that other people assign us”

Very apt. Very indeed.

it's obviously not about ice cream. It was a very insensitive comment in the face of millions of Americans who lost their jobs, businesses and livelihood. If you don't have any decency, then no one will listen to you.

I don’t think Trump and his supporters have much to stand on in regards to being sensitive, let alone modest.

I don’t believe Trump is capable of that change.

His supporters, on the other hand, are very capable of changing.

They just have to believe in someone other than Trump. Not Biden, Pelosi, AOC, nor the next Democrat or Republican superstar! They should start with believing in themselves.

"Its not about the ice cream...It's that [she] flaunted [her] $14K freezer and gourmet ice cream.. "

Bro.. it was a Show and Tell segment where James Corden, flanked with a jelly bean machine and 3 large separate candy dishes behind him, he himself eating ice cream "with her" via video later in the segment, literally asked her to share something from her home.. in a quite obviously produced puff piece ice cream segment with softball questions. Crying about a freezer she probably bought years ago and and her eating gourmet ice cream (aka supporting a small business during covid) is kind of ridiculous if you ask me.

....Especially considering that everyone knows who is fighting for funds to support struggling Americans and ...surprise... it ain't Mitch McConnell and the Repubs. They have consistently done everything they can to gut as many benefits for the poor in this country (coronavirus or not), while decreasing taxes for the rich.. Or at least as much as they can without effecting their vote. I'm sure as the wealth divide increases, this will be an increasingly difficult dance to pull off.

Kinda like Trump Haters having a meltdown about how much he plays golf.

Because he claimed he wouldn’t have the time. It was his own complaint about Obama. He claimed he’d be too busy when he was President. Then he was so surprised at how hard a job it was to run a country. But he still had time to out-golf Obama in his first term.

The Pelosi reaction was because she showed off her ivory tower in San Francisco with her $24k refrigerator full of $13 dollar a pint ice cream while cheering on Democrats for blocking coronavirus relief aid for people and small businesses who were struggling to make ends meet.
So, the reaction to Pelosi is just as justified as the reaction to Trump, if not more so.

Yet they focused on the ice cream.

Yup, just like they focused on the game.

Burn all the greens!

Truth! 👍

LOL

I'm not even american, and trump represents me at 500%

In what way?

The defense of the freedom of the individual as a principle. The defense of national interest and sovereignty, against globalist impositions.

Trump and his supporters are very much against gay rights and abortion. At this time in America, those are also individual freedoms. Trump has been at war with allies in dispute of trade for two-three years causing industry to suffer and requiring federal handouts to placate the effect of his trade war with China and Canada. That is not in the best of national interests. Putting America first is not even a real nationalist tradition but a globalist tradition, implying that after we're done here, we're coming for other countries in our aggressive expansion.

Trump was the first president to be elected to be for gay marriage. What the f**k are you smoking?

Gay rights don't end in marriage. Among his offences to the LGBT community, I present the highlights of the following...

1.20.17: Minutes after Donald Trump was sworn into office, any mention of the LGBTQ community was erased from White House, Department of State, and Department of Labor websites.

6.15.17 - The Department of Education rolls back the Office for Civil Rights' expansive approach to investigating civil rights complaints that to protect LGBTQ students, and other marginalized communities, from discrimination at school.

6.21.17 - Reporting reveals President Trump hired a lawyer who openly supported Russian President Vladimir Putin's anti-LGBTQ law banning so-called "gay propaganda" from Russia, a law that Europe’s top human rights court found to be illegal.

7.26.17 - The Justice Department files a brief opposing workplace nondiscrimination protections for the LGBTQ community under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in the case Zarda v. Altitude Express.

9.7.17 - The Education Department announces they will roll back Obama Administration-era Title IX guidelines which protected sexual assault survivors on college and university campuses.

9.7.17 - The Justice Department files an amicus brief in support files an amicus brief in support so-called “religious exemptions” to discriminate against LGBTQ Americans; including gay marriage.

10.6.17 - The Department of Justice issues a sweeping "religious exemptions" guidance which invites taxpayer-funded federal agencies, government employees, and government contractors to legally discriminate against LGBTQ employees as long as they cite a religious belief as the reason for doing it.

10.13.17 - President Trump becomes the first sitting president to speak at the Family Research Council's Values Voter Summit, a convening of fringe groups united around discrimination against LGBTQ people.

12.5.17 - White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders tells reporters that President Trump backs the position that businesses owners should be able to put up signs saying they won’t serve gays.

And that's just the first year... shall I continue?

Holy shit! Did millions die????

Reeeeeeeeeeeee

*yawn* Trump has his faults but no offense, your arguing sucks. Good effort tho, if it wasn't some copy and paste.

No need to screech. You know I'm not someone who takes bullshit at face value. If it stinks, I speak up.

True, there was some copy and paste involved but I actually meticulously scrolled through a page full of those little tidbits. Some as benign as Trump conversing with someone who the group deemed anti-LGBT.

It just seems to me, that if the LGBT love Trump, it be a good idea to get their perspective rather than yours, mine, or Trump's on how well he treats them.

Just a thought.

False. Trump's basically a libertine and doesn't care who bangs whom.

Libertarians like me fall into the same basic school.

Sure there are a few fundies out there. But they don't run the show.

And the trade stuff needed shaking up, it was too much at the dictates of the PRC and corporate interests on the continent here.

In what way has anything I said been false? Trump may very well be Libertine, that doesn't mean he doesn't support a group of people who are targeting another group of people and calling it religious freedom. Normally, I give people who are fighting for their religious freedom the benefit of the doubt, and would be in this case, if America hadn't already been here before. Before, it was people's religious freedom to not serve black people in the south. While homosexuals do not even come close to the level of persecution that black people had before and just after the Civil Rights movement, to say there aren't politicians and influencers targeting them is simply gross neglect.

I will give you one thing, trade needed a shake up but Trump basically had no idea how to conduct the "trade war" with China and Canada. The only thing he succeeded at was selling it to the American people, and if those large swathes of red empty land on the 2020 map proved, most of the farmers probably bought it.

You have asked me, and I have answered you very briefly. I think this is not the time to discuss politics. I do not agree with what you say.

Welcome to the politics page.

You might be asked to discuss politics.

I consider pre-born as human being, therefore an individual, subject of rights. It is a question of principles not of final effects.

However, Trump does not prohibit abortion, but if he opposes its legitimation.
https://www.businessinsider.com/ivanka-trump-says-she-is-pro-life-unapologetically-2020-10

Trump is not opposed to gays rights. It opposes all policies that criminalize LGBTIQ people in other countries of the world.

It opposes the political collectivization of social minorities. In favor of the content of the character of each individual.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/02/26/richard-grenells-homosexuality-is-the-wrong-reason-to-distrust-him/

Everything is explained here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sC0J1PGauqY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2qIXXafxCQ

Lets begin with that picture...

The earliest I could find of that picture dates back to November 9th 2016. And if you'll notice the LGBTˢ for TRUMP is scribbled in with a sharpie. Trump is unfortunately known for altering the narrative with a sharpie.

In fact, sharpies are being used to delegitimize votes in the current narrative.

See the original Sharpiegate here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-agIn4JFiK8

As for pre-born human beings. How far back are we talking when it comes to pre-? Ejaculation? Conception? Incubation? Right now, it is considered that if a woman is more than 12-24 weeks, then their fetus does have some rights, but obviously not the same amount of rights as any other human being because we usually allow a human being to have rights the older they get when it comes to sex, driving, smoking, and drinking.

When it comes to an argument of existing; it appears that Anti-Abortionists are not concerned at all for the reasons why a woman might consider an abortion. They care not for their reasons and only see Abortion as evil and must be done away with. Sadly, this is not the case as there are times when abortion is a necessary medical procedure and Anti-Abortion advocates don't do much to side moderately with that position.

He has done far more for the Anti-Abortionist agenda by appointing three Supreme Court judges, the last time we had any President did that was Ronald Reagan over the course of 8 years. Trump did it in 4. The last judge pushed simply as a literal Hail Mary like this were a football game.

Trump has scaled back on the rights of the LGBT community by focusing most of his attacks on the Trans community. Scaling back their ability to serve in the military. Among other issues which have been catalogued here for your viewing convenience:

https://www.glaad.org/trump

Yeah, Trump spoke to the Advocate, a gay focused magazine, 20 years ago, speaking positively about gay rights. https://getoutspoken.com/fact-check/trump-advocate-gay-rights.

So you're back. The harsh scary realities of the Trump regime suddenly over?

If Donald Trump ran 20 years ago, he'd be a Democrat. He'd be despised among Republicans and an embarrassment among Democrats.

No, I just am glad to see that I'm not alone. I'm sure the regime will continue to become violent and I believe Trump will carry on with what he's been doing for four years.

He will continue to tweet.

He will continue to hold rallies.

He will continue to influence the Republican party for a very long time.

Including after he dies. He will not go quietly like George H. W. Bush's legacy. In fact, I suspect Ivanka to run in 2024, if not 2028 and win the White House.

And I honestly wish her luck. She may turn out to be a great President as I somehow doubt the Democratic Party will target her as harshly as the Republican Party are doing Harris and Occasio-Cortez, who most certainly do not want them to be President.

You're back!

It’s true. People are so fanatical about Trump they think making fun of him means we’re making fun of them.

Not at all. I know a few former Trump Supporters. They don’t take offense to my jabs. They understand that I don’t blame them for voting for Trump. I am just baffled at people who defend his stupidity, attend his rallies, or even give him more money which he claims he doesn’t need. Those people baffle me. And I do my best to refrain from saying stuff like “you Trump Supporters” because I continue to assume the Law of Fame is in play. Eventually Trump will say something that they don’t like and stop supporting him. It always happens. In Trump’s case; the mileage may vary.