Say Her Name--Lynn Marie Maher

No because no leftists know about it because, ya know, MSM narrative.

Funny how every leftist resisting arrest who ends up dead gets elevated to the status of sainthood even though most of them have criminal backgrounds. Yes, Bob, past behavior does matter!

My heart broke for the death of this woman as she was married to her High School sweetheart, had four children and should not have been murdered. She was working hard (unlike people who were arrested by police officers generally for a reason & where resisting arrest is one of the mitigating factors). Instead of garnering sympathy or respect from leftists, once again you automatically feel sorry for criminals and not good Americans not bothering anyone.

"Her death is not comparable to a police killing."

Well you lost any credibility I might see in you.

Yep, the new leftist talking point. "That murder does not matter cuz it wasn't commited by a cop" unless... it serves an agenda.

Haha....I can barely count the strawmans now in this thread. Jesus christ....

"Her death is not comparable to a police killing"

Muh strawman. GFY

It is. Do you want me to explain it to you?

What you just quoted is 100% factually, objectively, inarguably correct. If you think otherwise, then you're committing the same fallacy that vBackman already committed.

I think they are comparable. Murder is wrong. Doesn't matter what color the victim's skin is or who they were killed by. Murder is murder.

So you strawmanned me. Got it.

I never said that one is murder and the other isn’t. That’s preposterous. What I said was that the circumstances of one murder is different than the circumstances of the other. For example, a murder from a knife and a murder from a gun are not comparable murders. But are they both murders. Of course.

Well would could I expect? Conservatives aren’t exactly known for good faith interaction.

They're both murder but they're not comparable? I think you need to look up comparable in the dictionary.

The people killed by rioters didn't get nearly as much press. In fact I only found out about most of them from Imgflip. Should those have gotten more press?

You say, "But her death is not comparable to a police killing."
I say, "Every Life Matters".

I daresay this mother's life will be particularly missed by her four sons, greatly missed by her husband and all the people who respected & loved her. To think that their loss is any less important than a person losing his life at the hands of a police officer is really ludicrous, Bob.

"To think that their loss is any less important than a person losing his life at the hands of a police officer is really ludicrous, Bob."

Wooooooooah there. That's one hell of a strawman. No one saying that her life mattered less than a victim of a police killing. I'm saying the circumstances of her death are different so that it's not going to picked up by national news as compared to a police killing, where the circumstances are completely different, as I listed already.

The circumstances are PRECISELY WHY media SHOULD REPORT Lynn Maher's murder by thug. If you believe in facts and statistics, Bob, you would want this stuff reported. Bu-bu-but you don't. It is just like CHICAGO DEATHS go UNREPORTED by the media as it does not advance their agenda to HATE POLICE. Look at the numbers & the facts for a change and then you might understand that you are on the 'wrong side' of this issue.

There are over 16,000 murders in the US last year. You're beyond deluded if you honestly think national news should cover every single one of them. And FYI, the chicago crime spike was reported by mainstream media. You're objectively wrong.

Bob, you must not comprehend very well. Had you comprehended my original comment to you, you wouldn't still be making this revolving argument.

Re-read what I told you(edited a little to help you understand) >>> If mainstream media removed all the junk-talk trashing everyone's name(bullshit about politicians half the day), and just REPORTED THE NEWS INSTEAD about the additional Black on Black crimes and Black on White murders, then we'd not have this overwhelming leftist-mentality false-narrative that "there's some white systemic racism going on".

If they reported the NEWS, they could fit more cases in, without a lot of the bla-bla "Trumps a racist" 100Xs a day.

White people in general would finally realize there's a lot of hatred against white people, when it's undeserved. Only 1.4% of the North owned slaves. Only 5.8% of the South owned slaves. Most white people worked their own fields, if they were lucky enough to have land, they'd have several children and family working fields. Only the super-wealthy had slaves. Slavery was also never popular.

So if there wasn't false-narrative of "all whites created slavery and owned slaves" then most black people wouldn't be so hateful towards whites in the first place.

Black on black crime and black on white crime doesn't debunk systemic racism, it proves it.

And I apologize I mentioned the civil war when you're talking about slave owning families, which played a pretty huge part in the civil war. What a dunce I am! Now would you like to actually address the crux of my argument or do you want to continue nitpicking?

"This is what you said. You said that if MSM reported black on black and black on white crime, then we'd not have the false narrative of a systemic racism. Literally what you said. Now quit changing your argument midway and address my points, coward."

--- Wrong. I didn't say it "debunks" anything, I said; "if there wasn't false-narrative of "all whites created slavery and owned slaves" then most black people wouldn't be so hateful towards whites in the first place." AFTER the context of everything else I addressed, which you dodged all day yesterday.

why do I even try, think I will get better results talking to my dog or cat, at least they tend to follow reason now and then.

"Your argument, which I quoted in its entirety goes about like this:

A: There is a "false" narrative of systemic racism
B: The MSM does not cover black on black and black on white crime
C: If the MSM covered black on black and black on white crime, than less people will believe the "false" narrative of systemic racism (or in other words, the black on black crime debunks systemic racism)
D: Therefore, MSM is furthering the false narrative of systemic racism by failing to report black on black and black on white crime

This is your argument. I accurately represented your argument.

"My life experience with people, proved to me, that lots of people believe that all white people should be blamed for slavery that was only of a few percentages."

First of all, that's anectdotal evidence, second of all, your numbers are wrong, as shown before (curious how you never addressed it)"

A1: That is a false narrative, all cops aren't racist, and there's not some systemic racism against black people, it's against white people. So you should learn to read better, because I've explained it.

B1: I said if they didn't talk so much about bla bla bla "Trump orangeman bad" they'd have more time to go over the BvB and BvW crimes. I didn't say they don't cover them. Just that they'd have more time to.

C1: You're forgetting my other points that you don't comprehend well, that there's white people, asian people, latinx people, that get treated just the same as black people by police, so it's not some "all cops are racist" false-narrative. It's a police have too much power and have qualified immunity problem.

D1: Yes, and also their focus is mostly on black victims of police brutality or law enforcement arresting criminals that resist arrest or shoot at police or attack police, that if white people, asian people, latinx people did any of the above we'd also be shot or beat up.

Overall: You didn't accurately represent my argument, you left a lot of parts out, but again, I realized that you have a reading comprehension issue. I can explain it to you, I can't understand it for you.

Anecdotal evidence is what has made up laws in this nation, so you thinking it's null and void if people tell me things or act out in different ways, doesn't add up to evidence of their racism against white people, you'd be intellectually dishonest to deny that my personal experience has no credibility on my life since I'm white and was systematically discriminated against.

"As for your second argument, a vast majority of people don't believe all whites created slavery and owned slaves, and most black people aren't hateful towards white people."

--- I didn't know you live in a bubble and have little life experience.

"The burden on proof is on you to prove both."

---- My life experience with people, proved to me, that lots of people believe that all white people should be blamed for slavery that was only of a few percentages.

"And I thought it was the conservatives who complained about too many white people joining protests?"

--- Huh?

"Black people hate them so much that their protests consist of mostly white people! Curious."

--- Huh? The black people that are racists, love the white people that are self-hating white cucks, especially the self-hating white women that love to "reparate" for black slavery, in sexual ways. How do I know that? I have heard it from their own words. That this is great for black men that want to come-up on a submissive white woman that will take abuse and sex slavery, for their "crimes of ancestry".

"Wrong. I didn't say it "debunks" anything, I said; "if there wasn't false-narrative of "all whites created slavery and owned slaves" then most black people wouldn't be so hateful towards whites in the first place."

Your argument, which I quoted in its entirety goes about like this:

A: There is a "false" narrative of systemic racism
B: The MSM does not cover black on black and black on white crime
C: If the MSM covered black on black and black on white crime, than less people will believe the "false" narrative of systemic racism (or in other words, the black on black crime debunks systemic racism)
D: Therefore, MSM is furthering the false narrative of systemic racism by failing to report black on black and black on white crime

This is your argument. I accurately represented your argument.

"My life experience with people, proved to me, that lots of people believe that all white people should be blamed for slavery that was only of a few percentages."

First of all, that's anectdotal evidence, second of all, your numbers are wrong, as shown before (curious how you never addressed it)

"Black on black crime and black on white crime doesn't debunk systemic racism, it proves it. And I apologize I mentioned the civil war when you're talking about slave owning families, which played a pretty huge part in the civil war. What a dunce I am! Now would you like to actually address the crux of my argument or do you want to continue nitpicking?"

--- I never said B on B or B on W violence, debunks anything. I said "if there wasn't false-narrative of "all whites created slavery and owned slaves" then most black people wouldn't be so hateful towards whites in the first place."

Now address my points, coward.

"If mainstream media removed all the junk-talk trashing everyone's name(bullshit about politicians half the day), and just REPORTED THE NEWS INSTEAD about the additional Black on Black crimes and Black on White murders, then we'd not have this overwhelming leftist-mentality false-narrative that "there's some white systemic racism going on".

This is what you said. You said that if MSM reported black on black and black on white crime, then we'd not have the false narrative of a systemic racism. Literally what you said. Now quit changing your argument midway and address my points, coward.

As for your second argument, a vast majority of people don't believe all whites created slavery and owned slaves, and most black people aren't hateful towards white people. The burden on proof is on you to prove both. And I thought it was the conservatives who complained about too many white people joining protests? Black people hate them so much that their protests consist of mostly white people! Curious.

Bob, this happens to white people, asian people, latinx people, not just black people. So the whole narrative that "ACAB" "All cops are racist" chanted by Antifa and BLM, is false.

You don't hear the chants say "End Qualified Immunity Now!".

Because Antifa/BLM want the violence cycle and riots there-after, to keep going. It's political power, that's all. They do not want real/actual solutions.

"Not every murder is going to covered by national news." -- Because of the MSM narrative, if they removed all the junk-talk trashing everyone's name, and just reported the news about Black on White murders, then we'd not have this over-whelming leftist-mentality false-narrative that "there's some white systemic racism going on". White people in general would finally realize there's a lot of hatred against white people, when it's undeserved. Only 1.4% of the North owned slaves. Only 5.8% of the South owned slaves. Most white people worked their own fields, if they were lucky enough to have land, they'd have several children and family working fields. Only the super-wealthy had slaves. Slavery was also never popular.

So if there wasn't false-narrative of "all whites created slavery and owned slaves" then most black people wouldn't be so hateful towards whites in the first place.

Oh so you’re one of those types who actually thinks it’s whites that are oppressed. Oh dear.

To address this point by point:

1. Of course there not going to cover it. There are thousands of murders every year. Not every one is going to be covered. Police killings are covered, because they’re killings by the state. To put it this way, imagine a dissenter in an authoritarian country like the USSR was executed by the state. Now imagine that the state does this to people every year and they are never punished for it. And there is a contingent of the population who bend over backwards to justify the dissenter’s murder by looking at his criminal record, his drug usage, etc. And when people protest the dissenter’s death, people like you come and smugly point out that, “oh but there’s other murders bro.” This type of killing, would get more coverage than a robbery gone awry for obvious reasons.

2. I don’t know why you had to bring up the civil war, but what you said was wrong anyway. And no ones saying “all whites created slavery and owner slaves. Don’t be ridiculous.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2019/08/07/percent-of-whites-owned-slaves/

Did you actually read my comment? I never once brought up the Civil War. Re-read it again, this time use the skill called reading comprehension, not skimming.

"Oh so you’re one of those types who actually thinks it’s whites that are oppressed. Oh dear."

---Bro, think? No, I know, and I explained many different factors in arguing that white people are being racially targeted and systematically oppressed. Media-News, Education, Film/Shows. So re-read the comment, that you skimmed over, and address each point of mine, from my previous comment. I'll give you three days to counter argue.

Libtards...

You could give Bob the rest of his life to come up with whatever lame, victim-oriented excuse he could make up and he still would not GET IT, FoundingFatherMaterial. I felt like InarenCorp did when Bob said "Her death is not comparable to a police killing" that he lost any credibility we might have afforded him. I'm done trying to reason with Bob as he just cannot deal with 'facts'.

lmaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaao

Ok so you just confirmed your stupidity. Thank you very much.

A B S O L U T E . C O P E

Well, I can't take seriously someone who will whine and complain about leftist victim mentality one day then unironically argue that whites are being systemically oppressed.

Sydney gave you some great advice, Bob. Since we all have equal rights, we should all be treated the same. We should be judged by our behavior, character and
achievements and not by color of skin. I have pointed out systemic racism at Yale in my attached meme. Now, you tell me specifically where there is systemic racism today for poc in America.

Here's a novel idea. Instead of cherrypicking the racism you want to see, call it all out. Even when whites are being shit on. You get pushback (leftists) because you'll cry all day about what you think are injustices to 'pocs' yet close your eyes when it happens to whites. And I mean cry all day. Riot loot burn and murder even!

Who said I didn't?

Address my points, coward.

I guess he is taking his FULL three days to counter (as he has to make up some response). Bob is quite used to con'cock'ing stuff as you know. Btw, I asked him, " Now, you tell me specifically where there is systemic racism today for poc in America." and he has yet to answer me as well, FoundingFM.

This is why you should move out of the nation.