Imgflip Logo Icon
ITS A LITTLE WEIRD HOW THE PLIGHT OF THE BLACK COMMUNITY HAS ROUTINELY BEEN BLAMED ON WHITE SYSTEMIC CONSERVATIVE RACISM; AND YET THE STATES WHERE THIS ARGUMENT IS ROUTINELY PRESENTED ARE COMING FROM STATES WHERE A WHITE CONSERVATIVE HASN'T BEEN ELECTED AT THE STATE LEVEL FOR DECADES AND ONLY OCCUPY THE FEDERAL LEVEL HALF THE TIME; IF SOMEONE IS TRULY GOING TO ARGUE THAT, DESPITE ALL THIS, 'SYSTEMIC RACISM' IS THE CAUSE OF THE PROBLEMS, THEN EITHER THIS IS AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THAT DEMOCRATS ARE THE CAUSE OR ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE ISSUE CAN'T BE REPAIRED, GIVEN THE DRASTIC LIMIT OF OPTIONS LEFT AVAILABLE | image tagged in memes,but that's none of my business,black background | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1,904 views 62 upvotes Made by anonymous 4 years ago in politics
48 Comments
10 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Dems have controlled blue cities and states for decades. They solved nothing. Sadly, minorities continue to support their Democrat slave masters. They believe the empty lies of Dems and Dems deliver empty promises.
7 ups, 4y
Yuuuuuuuuup!
8 ups, 4y
They have to blame someone because that's what they do, but they never blame themselves. It is ALWAYS someone else's fault.
7 ups, 4y
WOW!!! you're moving on to the next round
6 ups, 4y
Outstanding meme!

Too many words for the hardcore lefties here on the flip, though...
4 ups, 4y
Well done.
5 ups, 4y,
4 replies
IF systemic racism is solely a problem caused by Democrats, why is it also in every red state that hasn't elected a Democrate in decades?
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Sources please?
[deleted]
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
heh heh
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Not a source. I want shine kind of study or list of cases or anything really to back up your assertion.
2 ups, 4y
Wasn't my assertion.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Provides all the information you seek and more.

Start here. https://www.splcenter.org/

More specifically: https://www.splcenter.org/hate-map

Of course, this source is routinely dismissed by racists as being “the real racists.”

But you’re an open-minded fellow, you can read and make up your own mind.
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Here's a good article on it. It focuses on HIV, but it holds true for all diseases: https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2014/07/10/330217262/why-hiv-spreads-less-easily-in-heterosexual-couples

"Lifestyle stresses family" I'm not talking about their debate on whether homosexuality is accepted or not. I'm talking about the multiple different partners, dealing with the inevitable diseases and sicknesses and the effects of the depression and mental disorders.

I'm only talking about sexual activity. I'm not talking about people that identify as homosexuals and then don't have intercourse.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
0 ups, 4y
Actually it explains how viruses are more difficult to transmit to men because the tissue that make up male genitalia and female va**nal tissue are designed to not allow viruses in. So only a specific extremely virile HIV virus is able to be transmitted to men. It also explains that homosexuals transmit all HIV viruses not just the virile one. This is true of most diseases. It's all in the science. I have no clue why people are down voting my comments. They should take an interest in their own health and decide to do things that can mitigate this and spread the knowledge. Instead they down vote it so no one can see it.
No, my comment that homosexual activity is inherently harmful never changed. I don't care how you act. I care how your actions affect the people around you.
1 up, 4y,
3 replies
What is this, 1980?

Females of homosexual orientation are the lowest risk group for HIV infection and spread.

Males, regardless of orientation, are the major spreaders of the disease.

Subjecting people to such bogus biases, prejudice, harrasment, persectution, and strangulation of basic freedoms stresses them out. Gee, wonder how many studies it took to come up with that astute conclusion.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
1 up, 4y
Thanks.

It's like have flashbacks round here, I swear.

I was just now trying to read some of that drivel from that other fella going about conversion therapy and whatnot posted on that other thread from 5 days ago.

I had to stop because the only conversion I saw coming from his angle was from reality back to Moral Majority la la land before all them big mouths got caught one by one with their drawers down in some cheap hotel down in New Orleans performing 'unnatural' acts with painted harlots that were not their wives who were busy at home counting all the money the flock sent them so that Jesus can buy a mansion or three in Branford, Missouri.

"... and the homosexualityyyyyA, and the pornographyyyyyyA, and the prostitionnnnnA..."

5 years later,

"I have sinned against you *sob sob sniff sniff splat splat blegh*"

The one good thing we can say about Trump is that at least we already know what a vile bowl of rancid degeneracy he and his holier-than-Mao cultists are so when that bubble pops the only surprise will be that the word "Moral" is still in the dictionary after all these years of it being shat on by these raging self righteous hypocrites.
0 ups, 4y
persecution*
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
You need to catch up on the science. Please read up. My links are current.
1 up, 4y
Whatever you say, Mr 1980s.

I still don't do links still, DrStrangeFate?
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
You know it’s possible for religious groups to be hate groups, too.

Cults. Jonestown. Waco, TX. Westboro Baptist “God hates f*gs.” That “pastor” down in Florida who invited everyone to come see him burn a Quran. Etc.

I looked at my own city and found quite a few black nationalist-affiliated churches labeled, so it’s not like this organization has a bias against whites or conservatives.
0 ups, 4y
Sure individual churches or small religious groups, but we are talking things like the southern baptist convention and entire denominations of Christianity.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Really? Where? Chicago? Portland? Seattle? Baltimore? Compton? Detroit? name 1 red state that has a red city that is a total Schiffhole like any of those.
Go ahead. You cant. Because it doesn't exist
1 up, 4y
Sure. Let's define "total shifhole"

What points do you feel make Chicago, Portland, Seattle, Baltimore, Compton, or Detroit shitholes?

So, what are the points of data you feel make a city a shithole you want to list out so we can make some comparisions?
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
The question is why isn’t it any better in the “woke” states where the supposed System is in question and those with the power and motivation to change it haven’t. At least not in recent decades.
3 ups, 4y
There's this old joke: two young fish are swimming in the river one morning. An older fish swims by and says "How's the water, boys?"

The two young fish look at each other and say "what's water?"

And to make this unfunny by explaining it- the younger fish have no concept of water because they have always lived in it. Water is just how the world is.

The "woke" states are just as bad as the most racists southern state because the system has always been like this. You can't see it because that's how the world has always been.

But when you do see it, you see how far and deep it goes. It's EVERYWHERE.

And we don't see it because it's reinforced in us in a 1,000 small ways. From tv and movies, to the pictures the news channels use to show minorities.

So that's how you get a violent police force that brutally suppresses a minority population in a "woke" city like Seattle.
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
There is no systemic racism. It's a lie.
And you miss the point of the meme that the problems are occurring mostly in Dem citisna d States with almost all democrat leadership for decades
1 up, 4y
Well, is there none, or is it there in those Dem cities & States?
Stick with one lie. It's more efficient that way.
3 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Yes, there is systemic racism. Yes, it also happens in cities also run by democrats and by republicans.

IT. IS. SYSTEMIC. It is a part of our culture.
0 ups, 4y
HAA!

"There is no systematic racism, and you missed the point that it's happening in Dem cities & States."

Ummmmmmmmmm,,,,,,,
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
BullSchiff.
There is no SYSTEMIC racism. Tell me a right a black person doesn't have that a white person does?
Unless of course you are talking about racism against whites and asians. Yes, that Systemic racism exists since we can not have a Whie history month, A white Congressional caucus, we don;t get extra points for job applications to government jobs or school administration
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Everything you say about "whites don't get this, whites don't get that" is the evidence of systemic racism.

The system is built to give us an advantage and disadvantage everyone else.

I know that you can't see that. That inability to see the problem is part of it being systemic.

You literally can't see the forest because of some trees.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
"There is none, but there is some the other way around."

Doublespeak contradicting itself within the same sentence!
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
The only racism systenis is programs like Affirmative Action, Quotos to hire people of color, Points for civil service tests for being a person of color etc.
0 ups, 4y
Um, no.

And you forgot to add limits to how many Asians can be accepted at prime universities in order to maintain a 'white' majority.
0 ups, 4y
You're literally delusional. You don;t even realize the proper use of the word literally.

Pathetic
2 ups, 4y
Excellent nonetheless!
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
Your meme is quite factual and cogently-argued, and touches upon a truth that is obscured by our era’s hyperpartisanship and the 24-hour news cycle.

Systemic racism transcends partisan politics. It’s woven into the fabric of our country.

It’s the background radiation left over from the Big Bang of our nation’s Founding. At which time all men were aspirationally proclaimed “equal,” but those with dark skin were notably excluded from that promise.

Ending slavery in 1865 was a huge step in living up to that promise, but it was sadly followed up by 100 years of Jim Crow.

Indeed, the Jim Crow system was so terrible for blacks that Adolf Hitler cited it with approval in the 1920s and 1930s as a model for a successful apartheid racist state. The Nazis carried it to an even greater extreme, but frightening to think we inspired the Nazis in this.

Passing the Civil Rights Act in 1964 was another big step forward, and while the Act made blacks equal under the law, it did not magically make blacks equal in practice.

Specifically: Many black families who had been previously excluded from owning property or amassing wealth during the hundreds of years of slavery and Jim Crow remained impoverished, and they continued to live in de facto segregation.

Social and economic conditions improved marginally for blacks, but they remained locked out of many job and wealth-creation opportunities. The post-WWII economic boom faded, the gap between rich and poor increased, and black families found it harder and harder to get on a ladder to prosperity.

Black voters favor Democrats overwhelmingly, perhaps because they seem to be the party that listens the most to these concerns. However, Democratic politicians haven’t delivered meaningful equality to date. Both from their own racism and from the need to safeguard themselves against attacks from the Right.

Tl;dr: Systemic racism is so deep that it infects both parties. The most aggressive proposals for tackling it (really tackling it) haven’t been given a fair hearing by either party as of yet. Though I believe that is starting to change.

Can it be repaired? Maybe not. Perhaps we’ll never overcome the original sins of our Founding. But we have to try.
3 ups, 4y
Wow, a reasonable summation. Maybe not completely accurate but reasonable.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
"It’s the background radiation left over from the Big Bang of our nation’s Founding. At which time all men were aspirationally proclaimed “equal,” but those with dark skin were notably excluded from that promise."

Cute story, load of crap.

All landed gentry men of British, Germanic, and Scandinavian extraction who were Protestents were considered 'equal' and initially the Right to Vote was to be granted only to them, a new Aristocracy.

Then the Founders reluctantly expanded it to all land owning men of such background because should the American Revolution Chapter II come to be should they feel slighted by the exclusion, the Founding Fathers wouldn't be able to hide as easily as the British Royalty & Aristocracy could safely esconced overseas.

THAT's the reason for the Electoral College, since in America, even wealthy large landowners could have been a mere generation or two from their penal colony criminal class roots.
As a compromise to entice States with smaller populations to sign on was part of it, but secondary to the worry that the ignorant and intellectually compromised masses of lower breeding could very well be lured into voting for a populist rampaging lunatic and thus it would provide a means to void those votes in favor of someone more suitable and civilized.

A few years after, Catholics were also allowed the vote, and a few years after that so were Jews.

Then other races and ethnicities and, of course, womem,
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Wow what a self important douche you are. No one is more woke than you and damn that guy for trying.
1 up, 4y
Try not to melt in one place, snowflake.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • But That's None Of My Business
  • Black background
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    ITS A LITTLE WEIRD HOW THE PLIGHT OF THE BLACK COMMUNITY HAS ROUTINELY BEEN BLAMED ON WHITE SYSTEMIC CONSERVATIVE RACISM; AND YET THE STATES WHERE THIS ARGUMENT IS ROUTINELY PRESENTED ARE COMING FROM STATES WHERE A WHITE CONSERVATIVE HASN'T BEEN ELECTED AT THE STATE LEVEL FOR DECADES AND ONLY OCCUPY THE FEDERAL LEVEL HALF THE TIME; IF SOMEONE IS TRULY GOING TO ARGUE THAT, DESPITE ALL THIS, 'SYSTEMIC RACISM' IS THE CAUSE OF THE PROBLEMS, THEN EITHER THIS IS AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THAT DEMOCRATS ARE THE CAUSE OR ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE ISSUE CAN'T BE REPAIRED, GIVEN THE DRASTIC LIMIT OF OPTIONS LEFT AVAILABLE