Weakened society seems to be the goal

How'd you catch that?

Is the red head copper cab or are you joking?

Yes, but even after you posted that I had to really look. I'm just amazed you noticed it.

Yep, I saw that too. It's amazing we are where we're at when a troll like that can have a degree of reality to it.

Explain affirmative action quotas, then. Explain "hate crimes", then. Explain reparations, then.
Explain Indian casinos, then. And the list goes on.

Indian casinos are easy. They are their own country. They make their own laws.

Care to give an example of that?

And yet they are citizens and get "extra" rights and $$ benefits, so thank you for making my point.

Anyone born on the north american continent or "america" is a citizen. They don't get extra rights. They are their own government with a few regulations from DC. They get money as payback for the US removing their ancestors from their land, it kind of like reparations.

Little factoid: If someone in government asks if you are a US citizen, just say "I have not taken an oath or affirmation in front of a federal judge, so no I am not. I am an American citizen though."

Those are not extra rights. They're concessions.

I'm on the fence with most of those things, and definitely against reparations. I'm not sure what you mean by "indian" casinos, I assume that is a done deal. But to say they have zero ideas that are good or that they have no reason to "b**ch", "whine" , or think they've been treated unfairly while being marginalized down to just their "looks" in a meme is a bit unfair.

People should be paid equally if they're doing the same work as everyone else for as long as anyone else. If people advocate they should be paid more then another group of people because they are less desirable or more desirable is racism. Does affirmative action effective eliminate the financial gap seen between African Americans, women, and other minorities than White people? No, but the idea it represents is not wrong nor inherently depraved or crazy. And very likely there are people, who object to people you find "less desirable" earning the same, if not more, who undermine such quotas for nefarious means if not for pure self-interest.

Judging people or giving them extra benefits because of inheritable qualities they have no control over is inherently wrong.

You're an idiot.

I applaud your correct use of the word "you're".

Post modern liberalism is a disease, a cancer of the intellect. And like any cancer, you cannot reason, bargain or negotiate with it. You can only eliminate it as quickly as possible, before it consumes the host upon which it feeds without mercy.

You're still an idiot and can't track a conversation.

Just because you're uninterested in talking and much more interested in shaming doesn't mean I can't track a conversation. I just don't see the point in believing a group of people are out to get you. Or fearing those who are different from myself. I think when you see people intentionally drawing a line of difference between you and them; I don't see much productivity if the answer to that is extermination. Whether humanly by assimilation (or de-assimilation,) or literally.

Let's boil this down.
You said nobody was interested in extra rights. You're dead wrong and then proved it. Done.

Then I put it to you how being able to marry, paid equally, have protection against religious prejudice, and serve in the military is asking for anything more than what you, I presume, are, were, or ever will be capable of doing?

Apples and oranges. You cannot track a conversation, let alone correctly interpret the meme.
I do not have the time, nor the crayons to explain this to you You've got some cockeyed idea about liberals are for an equal meritocracy or some naive idealist joke, which is NOT the system already in place and is NOT what the Progressives are pushing. They already have extra rights and want more, ideally at the expense of the white male, their idea of evil. Done. Really.. done.

Well, I'm sorry you feel that way but it seems you feel genuinely threatened by people who are different. I'm just not. I feel that individuals should be able to disagree without any threat to their character or livelihood. True, this is not the current status quo but I do not see only liberals pursuing this kind of silencing of groups and individuals with "dangerous" ideas. And it seems counterproductive to pursue that kind of strategy if it only serves to feed fascist ideology.

Oh, shut the F-ck up about what I feel, you utterly clueless, ever assuming jackass.
You can't track conversation, you don't know what I think and you sure as hell don't know my feelings. You're an idiot.

What an emotional response. Which is to be expected from one so passionate and emotional while overlooking the similarities between people who are different from you. You're free to disagree with my analysis and correct me but you seem more concerned with one-upping me than actually having a conversation. You use what you perceive to be my handicap of tracking conversation as derailing your narrative that people who are different are evil.

It is my experience that people who are ignorant are easily frustrated when their world view is challenged. And that it best to engage with these individuals rather than simply mock or highlight their shortcomings. If you are not so fond of idiots, then there is a way to eliminate them without suspending their rights, attacking their character, or in the most extreme cases, murdering them. You can educate them. Talk to them and try to see their point of view. Or, you can ignore them.

Ignoring a problem, however, does not make it go away.

Still an idiot. I'm going to ignore you and hope you go away.

Okay Doc... now this meme is funny! Nice sense of humor with this.

Nice non-sequiter, Steedly.