the Dems always take credit for the good and never for the chaos the create

the world might enter a recession in the next few years, but that won't be trump or any next president's fault. it'll be because of the coronavirus and china's industry being bigger than most other countries. imagine if china's gdp fell by a seemingly small number. the aftermath would be a catastrophe.

the base premise is false from the start.
just a political football created to either praise,or condemn a president.

Eh, there’s some truth the point you’re making. However, I think to completely reduce the economic state of the country to simply a ‘created political football’ is ignorant and shortsighted. The executive branch’s administrative actions absolutely influence the economy.

It’s not exactly an exhaustive list, but here are three examples of economy harming actions, especially when done in tandem.

Shackling businesses with over-regulation harm’s the economy.

Increased individual income tax burdens (aka. wealth confiscation and redistribution) harms the economy.

Increased corporate taxes stifles product/technology innovation, investment, and growth of businesses.

unless you think the president is a monarch.

where the president can actual effect the market is in foreign policy.
and sometimes,to a lesser extent,political signaling..in which the market (wall street) will react,but this is usually short term.

fiscal policy is set by both the executive branch and congress.

our economy is not a monolith.

You’re welcome? I fail to see how I made your point though. You can walk back your original comment if you like, that a president receiving blame or credit for economic change is a false premise, and nothing more than a manufactured way to praise or condemn. I disagree, I think the economic state of our country has a lot to do with actions taken by administrations, and I never came close to suggesting 'our economy is a monolith'.

Says the moron that doesn't know the difference between affect and effect.

I merely pointed out your ignorance. Sane, rational people would start questioning the "reasoning" behind your argument given that you have a flawed ability to wield the English language.

This evidently infuriated you so much you went full retard toddler in response. Now your argument can be called into question due to your emotional immaturity.

Did you make a valid point? That's completely irrelevant. Your mistake and emotionally immature response made anything you said utterly suspect. All of which, I take no small amount of joy pointing out, is on YOU.

Sure, but you can bet if the "economy" was not doing well, Trump would be blamed by the lamestream media. That alone, imo, is enough justification for him to claim credit for it.

That, and of course, the fact that the previous president is trying to take credit for something he said could not happen.

Obongo the magic monkey

quotes from the magic monkey

Then it's funny that Obama is trying to take credit for a "booming" economy now.

Oh come on now Dan, did you really believe that by adding obvious facts it would help them to see how they dont know shit.

spread the word there comrade, it will do wonders for your soul.

It’s not a fact that nationwide farm bankruptcies are at an all time high, but libs never let lies get in the way of making a butthurt meme

he didn't say they were, Francis ( :

So what did his last line say, ginger?

LOL if you can't read English, it's really gonna hold you back in this country ( :

He said Farm Bankruptcies are at an 8 year high. That is a not a true fact in this country. I called you out on it and now you want to deflect. TFL, and you wonder why we make fun of you around here

you poor sad thing. you can't call me out on an embarrassing mistake you made ( :

here's what just happened:

1) 3rd4thT said "Farm bankruptcies are at an 8-year high."
2) then you said nationwide farm bankruptcies are not at an all-time high
3) then I said "he didn't say they were, Francis" (which obviously he didn't)
4) then you replied with equal snarkiness, but much less logic, "so what did he say, ginger?"
5) then I pointed out, again, that you either didn't read it right or you just can't tell facts from spin anymore
6) then you changed your position, hoping no one would notice. but we did ( :

You’re right, I said all time when I should have said 8 year high

His point about 8 year high is a lie, but in the immortal words if your failed queen

What difference does it make now

that apology still needs a little work ( :

nobody really cares about the mistakes. it's the snark when you're wrong that needs the apology. you only get to be snarky when you're right ( :

i can teach you how to write these reconstructions for yourself, and you may find it useful the next time your feeling lucky. could save us all a lot of time. let me know.

Acknowledge the mistake but never apologize

*you're

Well in the cretin's defense, he does only have 8 fingers, a consequence of a fine family tradition of purifying their stock through restricted breeding practices.

Lies and half truths...the DNC should hire you as a script writer on their new weekly comedy series called “The Debates“