that is outside the context and irrelevant. Again, Hopkins made more money that you probably ever would and he was as handicap as he would be. Being handicap does not mean that you could provide for society and earn a living. And most people care for those who are unable to take care of themselves. Your argument reflects less than 1% of the population and really is not valid. You just want to protect lazy people without a backbone who wants to depend on other's income. You talk about Jesus, what do you know about Jesus? Again out of context, but humor me.