Imgflip Logo Icon

Nazis Defined: Sound Familiar?

Nazis Defined: Sound Familiar? | image tagged in who's the nazis,nazis,nazism,antifa,democrats,national socialists | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
17,793 views 102 upvotes Made by RogueNation 5 years ago in politics
209 Comments
13 ups, 5y
Slow-Clap Otter | *APPLAUSE* | image tagged in slow-clap otter | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
9 ups, 5y
swastika | BUT IT’S DEMOCRATIC NAZIS | image tagged in swastika | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
11 ups, 5y,
5 replies
. | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Feel free to show me how the Left hate Jews without using the word Israel... aaaand go.
[deleted]
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
True, but they're beginning to see the light. Too bad you're not. Ever hear of the Walk Away movement? I doesn't just apply to queers.
2 ups, 4y
"I doesn't just apply to queers"

then why the frick was blaire white participating in that??
1 up, 5y
well, dems don't worship the gov. its a kangaroo court up there.
[deleted]
3 ups, 5y,
4 replies
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Not completely true...gun control was already strict during the Weimar Republic, but the Nazi's fine tuned it to fit their purposes...kinda like making loopholes for police/military/special citizens and prohibiting the average person from owning firearms...sound familiar?
2 ups, 5y
That's complete garbage. The age restriction was lowered by two years and permits were extended by 2 years, also restrictions were only on handguns.
0 ups, 4y
https://www.nationalreview.com/2013/12/how-nazis-used-gun-control-stephen-p-halbrook/
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Nazis never tried to ban guns? You need a re-education.
1 up, 4y
eyy who needs facts and evidence when you can be condescending and say "U R NEED SMART!!!"
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
You were too stupid to learn history weren't you?
0 ups, 4y
american dumbf**k. u dont know nothing about us haha.
3 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Totally stupid. No democrats I currently know support any of those things. You are just a parrot attempting to fear monger
4 ups, 5y,
2 replies
You should watch the democrat debates.... every candidate is arguing for almost every point on that list.
3 ups, 5y,
3 replies
Except the last two... Democrats don’t worship anything except maybe Politically Correct culture. That doesn’t mean they worship the government.
5 ups, 5y,
1 reply
The left does actually want more government regulations telling them what to do.
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
More along the line of protection of workers and customers at the expense of small businesses. Yes.
6 ups, 5y,
1 reply
That's part of it. There's another side as well. I think all governments should be as small as possible, but that my opinion.
2 ups, 5y
It’s my primary reason for voting Republican locally. We’ve been pretty red for awhile now. Use to be a blue state. But most southern states were.
0 ups, 4y
Same difference,
1 up, 5y
They don't have to announce it, it's part of their manifesto.
3 ups, 5y
Stop trying to project everything on to the Democrats. Republicans are just as guilty of everything on that list.

Holy imaginary Jesus Christ American voters are willfully ignorant, bias and nothing but useful idiots.
1 up, 5y
You don't get out much, do you?
10 ups, 5y
But... but... don't you know dems are trying to create a social nationalist state, which is /tooooootally/ different from a national socialist state!

Zinas are the complete opposite of nazis!
8 ups, 5y,
2 replies
hitler used the german socialist party to gain support from workers and moved from there to create a fascist state, not a socialist state
[deleted]
9 ups, 5y,
2 replies
https://i.imgflip.com/3crvy9.jpg
5 ups, 5y,
2 replies
cherry picking beliefs from two different systems doesnt make them the same thing
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Socialist is IN THEIR NAME - it's their core principle.
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
the only thing socialism and fascism have in common is the suffix :|
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
"Socialism is the ideology of the future"- joseph goebbels
0 ups, 5y
you think a nazi would stand by their word?
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Allah is Arabic for god. Both made up religions are the same imaginary man in the sky.

Doctrine is all that separates them
0 ups, 5y
okay?
3 ups, 5y
[deleted]
3 ups, 5y,
2 replies
[deleted]
7 ups, 5y,
2 replies
2 ups, 5y
He wanted to ban smoking instead of using the non-aggression principle.
[deleted]
1 up, 5y
That depends if your asking me to put it out or not jk
3 ups, 5y
yes it does, op is saying that socialism is fascism when theyre literally on opposite ends of the political spectrum, im saying that hitler didnt create a socialist state he created a fascist state
11 ups, 5y,
4 replies
let's have the facts now!
9 ups, 5y,
3 replies
What a bunch of libtarded bullshit.
6 ups, 5y,
1 reply
wake up you're all delusional🤣
3 ups, 5y
Wow. More original content from the spurg.
7 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Saying it’s bs isn’t proof it is. In fact your triggered by it. So there must be some truth to it.
6 ups, 5y,
1 reply
That crap isn't worth defending. Promote eternal war? Are you dumb enough that I have to argue that lie? The dem's are the pro war party now.
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Lolololol. So Trump your puppet master tells you he’s bringing all the Troops home and you just believe it. 😂😂😂

Trump? The guy who struts around talking big shit to NK and Iran.

Oh yeah I thought he had NK on their knees.

I’m in my 50s and have never voted democrat yet

But you need to wake up. Trump is a F narcissistic pathological lying womanizing douche bag who has no clue about the world beyond golf resorts and trying to enrich himself

Now go pound sand you poor man.
6 ups, 5y,
3 replies
Wow, you're a pretty bitter person. Usually I have a certain respect for people that stand apart from the crowd and call out both sides but you, regardless of your voting record, are still a typical sheep.

Trump has battled the warmongering faction in the Republican party over bringing troops home, the Boltons, the Pompeo's, the Grahams, the Haley's. He actually feels the anguish of the people who's brothers and sisters died fighting for their country. Of course you'll deny that and call Trump a sociopath etc etc but you are particularly afflicted by TDS.

Get back on your fence and break your arm patting yourself on the back.
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
11,000 Kurds died fighting OUR war against ISIL there.
Americans dead? 6. That's it/
And that putrid self adulating pussbag just sentenced those warriors who fought the war he takes credit for to DEATH.

Why? To stick another notch on his belt of blow jobs he's performed on dictators.
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
You know where I stand on the 'fight against ISIL'. That whole get rid of Assad by supporting ISIL and Al Nusra/now use the Kurds to get rid of ISIL clusterf**k. Ever wonder why the single time ISIL attacked Israel, they apologized?
0 ups, 5y
Get rid of whom?
The only ones who want to get rid of Assad are the rebels.

There's a reason he's STILL there
The SAME reason he's been there since before.
The reason that was reaffirmed when the Arab Spring revolts overthrew their dictators.
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Where exactly are you getting this from?
4 ups, 5y,
2 replies
What? Trump ran on being an anti interventionalist.
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
They ALL run as anti interventionists.

Really, do you recall ANY President running on a "Let's have a war" platform?
3 ups, 5y,
3 replies
Hillary said she was going to invade Iran but she was bought and paid for more than most presidential candidates.
2 ups, 5y
Come on man, not only did I explain this to you, it's right there, middle of the 2nd sentence.
Like every single other politician, should Iran attack Israel, America will attack Iran.
That IS exactly what she is saying there.

And like Trump found out the hard way when he was instructed to shut his stupid mouth and step down by those who gear this crap uo, that is not happening. That's why Cheney/Bush didn't, even though that was the plan. Afgan > Iraq > Iran. Iran is the BIG enchilada. Those other 2 were excercises.

Notice no exploding drones hitting Japanese freighters or oil rigs lately? OUR Bay of Tonkin fake ops stopped for a reason. Not that anyone was buying them.
2 ups, 5y
No. Read the quote that YOU posted.
1 up, 5y
hilleary shouldn't be runnin for POTUS.
bill did, why should we have a bill puppet?
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
And yet...
4 ups, 5y
I'm not sure that's a valid criticism. Time will tell. Trump could get suckered in a conflict. He can get emotional, but his record up til now is good. He just called out Graham for being a military industrial complex shill.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I do pat myself on the back for understanding who and Trump is.

You won’t allow yourself to see it and more power to you. Everyone has the right to be stupid and gullible
0 ups, 5y
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
too true.
these are also facts that can strongly relate to the left.
do you know why its the left are donkeys?
CAUSE THEY'RE ASSES
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Only asses I like are attached to females.
0 ups, 5y
9 ups, 5y,
5 replies
Now THAT is hilarious....let's just go down that list...shall we?

Nationalistic - any patriotic American is nationalistic, regardless of political affiliation. It simply means that you like your country better than other countries - and how is that bad?

Anti-Immigrant - Republicans only want to stop illegal immigration, which is the SAME as law enforcement. These people are criminals, breaking our laws.

Anti-gay - Republicans only want to keep it out of education. 6 year olds should not be exposed to that.

Militaristic - Yes, we all know Democrats want to dismantle national defense, but that goes with being anti-American...so nobody is surprised.

Anti-Union - nobody is talking about that on either side....except the unions.

Well funded propaganda machine - now this made me laugh, and is why I decided to reply. Conservatives have basically 1 mainstream news source (Fox), while every other media outlet is a mouthpiece for the Democrats. On top of that, Democrats enjoy support from liberal tech companies like Facebook, Twitter, Google, and Apple.... The deck is so incredibly stacked against conservatives that this statement alone should earn you a Pinocchio nose.

Anti-leftist - no, we're anti-anti-American. Do stuff that makes the country stronger and we won't want to stop you.

Anti-woman - HAHAHAHH, says the party who wants to let men pretend they're women. We conservatives like our women to be female. And who's anti-woman anyway. My wife owns the most expensive guns in my family.

Anti-minority - Republicans are gaining record new minority voters, because so many are waking up to the false promises of the Democrat party. So sad, you're losing your base.

Employ bullying tactics - When was the last time Republicans protested outside the house of a liberal journalist? Trump supporters are attacked openly, while the only attacks on liberals turn out to be hoaxes. What has it been, a dozen hoaxes this year alone? Two dozen? I'm going numb to it...nobody believes you anymore.

Promote eternal war - because Obama got us out of Afghanistan like he promised.....

Corporate friendly - Only because we like capitalism....it's the foundation of our nations economic system.

Fearmongering - I'm not afraid of jack shit. If you're afraid of something, that's your problem. Don't blame your fears on others.
5 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Well said. Reminder that Trump was the 1st pro gay marriage president upon election. Trump is also calling for more LEGAL immigration, which libs never acknowledge. Thanks for bothering to debunk some of that nonsense, it's all so tiresome...
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Sometimes, that one thing just sets me off and I MUST respond. Mostly it's about guns, or the economy, or taxes, or fake news..

shit - a lot of things set me off.
6 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Back in the Dubya days, there was alot of animosity towards Bush, and rightfully so. Then Obama and regardless of a complete media silence, there were fair criticisms of his presidency, fast and furious, IRS scandal, deposing Gadaffi when he was actually serving his people and doing good things, free healthcare, schooling etc, whereas now we have the European migration crisis and open market slave trading in Libya. But the level of unfairness, lies and misrepresentation of Trump is beyond anything I've ever seen. How do the left make entitled and rich Trump into an underdog? It's amazing. The left just can't stand that an old boomer non pc rich white man is leader of the free world. "IT WAS HER TURN!!!!" bwhaha Man, what a thumb in the eye to those precious little snowflakes that just can't believe a dinosaur like Trump could be their president.
3 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Lockerbee Qaddaffy Duck? The bloody dictator Americans ridiculed for 3 decades? The one Cowboy Ron tried to blow up? THAT guy?
HIS people desposed him, beat the living crap out him dead.
Arab Spring? Google?

You never watched Fox in the past decade? They're the idiots that got this nonstop drone-arama editorializing 'news' trend going.

Obama went through shit that NO President has gone through EVER. Or have you forgot the do-nothing Congress that stymied his every single move and appointement? Compare that to the "M-M-Maybe we should do something but can we wait till Trump nukes somebody first" Demz. Bunch of fakers. Yeah, big coincidence Trump has only become MORE brazen with them heading the House.
"We know your party offered $0 for your wall, would you like $3.6 billion from us, Mr Don?"
6 ups, 5y,
1 reply
You should look into what prompted him to be deposed. I'll give you a hint. It had to do with the way he wanted oil to be paid for. And shitbag though he may have been but he made Libya into the most successful African country. He actually did some good things, now it's a mess.

Fox is guilty but I thought CNN started that trend.

Yes, Obama got screwed with but he wasn't targeted for impeachment from day one or derided as an illegitimate president.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Again, no.
Arab Spring, Google

Remind me to download some of the wacky reason ones I've seen on Pinterest from Afrocentric sorts to show you. Goodness, them and the Alt Rights should get together in a room, a lovely dual explosion of imbeciles.

Nope. Fox still.

Obama wasn't targeted for impeachment by the 'Our sole mission is to make Obama a one term President' GOPpers for a reason. HINT: It wasn't for the 'affirmative action' reason the cartoon set sez. Same reason no indictments, convictions, and prison sentences for any of his associates.
It's really simple: Don't do bad shit, and you won't get busted for said bad shit that you never done did. Because maffs.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Typical liberal. Uses Pinterest as a credible news source. We're f**ked, now!
0 ups, 4y
Typical retard with nothing to say because it can't even read.

Let's see if I can break this down so that even an imbecile like you perhaps might maybe understand it:

"Remind me to download some of the wacky reason ones I've seen on Pinterest from Afrocentric sorts to show you. Goodness, them and the Alt Rights should get together in a room, a lovely dual explosion of imbeciles."

"wacky reason ones I've seen on Pinterest from Afrocentric sorts ... them and the Alt Rights should get together in a room, a lovely dual explosion of imbeciles."

"wacky reason ones ... on Pinterest from Afrocentric sorts ... imbeciles."

In other words - jot this down if you must - the Afrocentric sorts are imbeciles just like you imbeciles are.

G-G-Git it?
0 ups, 4y,
3 replies
It never ceases to amaze me how libtards like you and so many others are so worried a conservative is going to nuke somebody when the only person who ever nuked anybody was a democrat.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
1 up, 4y
you're the last person i'd expect to see defending the atomic bomb, mate.
1 up, 4y
Made the USA into the most powerful entity to have ever existed on this planet - even more than ALL the GodS COMBINED.
1 up, 4y
Actually it was the United States of America that nuked the Japs, or are you in your delightful stupidity saying solely Democrats fought in WWII while Republicans stayed home?
That is so cool, guy, thank's fer thuh edumbuhcashun.
1 up, 5y
RIGHT ON, MY MAN
you just spelled out that the donkeys are true asses.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
"Militaristic - Yes, we all know Democrats want to dismantle national defense, but that goes with being anti-American...so nobody is surprised."

eyyy if you think we've spent too much on military you hate america

"Corporate friendly - Only because we like capitalism....it's the foundation of our nations economic system."

really? why is it usually republicans that favor government funded highways and government subsidized car companies rather than privately-funded passenger railways? i am aware that transportation isn't a left/right issue, but it has been cuckservatives who have given themselves the shields of "patriotism" and "freedom" to delegitimize railroads.

"... while the only attacks on liberals turn out to be hoaxes."

no. good lord, where'd you get that from? attacks exist on both sides of the isle.
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
Fun!

I don't think any business should receive a subsidy - ever. If they can't succeed, then they deserve to fail. Highways, however, benefit everyone - and privatization leads to toll roads. So, if you want more toll roads.....

Name an attack on a liberal that DIDN'T turn out to be a hoax, then do the same for a republican where it DID turn out to be a hoax.

This should be hilarious!
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
"Name an attack on a liberal that DIDN'T turn out to be a hoax"

Charlottesville?

"I don't think any business should receive a subsidy - ever. If they can't succeed, then they deserve to fail. "

that does technically mean that ford, GMC, and chevy would be out of business real quick because car prices are cheaper than they should be under government subsidy.

"same for a republican where it DID turn out to be a hoax."

good god you suffer from linear thinking. i said attacks exist on both sides of the isle.
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
You know James Alex Fields was a neo-nazi, right? That's not conservative.

And, of course, you can't name a Republican who perpetrated a hoax.

Thanks for playing!
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
you said "attack on a liberal", never specifying republican.

for the record, John Lennon
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Is he feigning ignorance, or is he actually ignorant.....it's a tough call.

Lennon was not an American
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
you never specified "american", either
0 ups, 4y,
6 replies
Are we talking about politics outside of America? Hello? Bueller? Am I alone here?
1 up, 4y
Lennon was left-leaning. Counts as a liberal here
1 up, 4y
lennon was in america when he was killed
0 ups, 4y
He couldn't vote here, so I'm going to call him what he really was - a non-voting legal alien. And who cares what his politcal bent was - he hadn't even the most basic power in the USA - he didn't have the power to vote.
0 ups, 4y
Regardless, attacks happen on both sides of the isle. Knowing how to spell "hoax" doesn't make that any less true
0 ups, 4y
Lennon wasn't killed for his political views, he was killed because the killer thought it would make him famous. I fail to see how Lennon was a political attack.
0 ups, 4y
So, all foreigners are assigned a US political party when they get here? Who gets to pick?
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
1 up, 4y
To the left, anyone who isn't a liberal.
0 ups, 4y
Nobody wants them, it's basically a criminal gang that continues to follow a foreign political ideology...so....
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
21 years is how far back you had to go.

Well done!

Except.... He was anti-government. The FBI datasheet on this guy contradicts you on this one. They specify a lot of motivations, but religion wasn't one of them. If you have more information than that, the FBI would probably be interested to hear it.

https://www.fbi.gov/history/famous-cases/eric-rudolph

How likely is it that I can find a conservative who was attacked last week? How many hundred in 2019 alone? We could even limit it to politicians and I can come up with at least a half dozen this year.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
You said it yourself, the bombs were fake. Fake = hoax.

Thanks for making my point.

Regarding Rudolph, you can cite your source - because my source doesn't mention religion at all, and they're the ones who did the investigation (which makes them the authority)
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Sure it does. Nobody was ever in any danger. That makes it a hoax.

Sorry, I don't blindly believe things I read on websites I've never heard of. People attribute nonsense to others all the time. Just look at the AOC memes. The FBI says it wasn't religious motivation, and they did the investigation.
0 ups, 4y
You linked to the website of a terrorist group claiming responsibility. That group isn't even mentioned by the FBI. They don't associate the group with the attack. Any idiot can make a claim online, and apparently you'll believe it.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
0 ups, 4y
Terror groups claim responsibility for all sorts of things to give themselves legitimacy.

There are books on the phenomena https://www.jstor.org/stable/20798930
0 ups, 4y
Cite it or STFU.
0 ups, 4y
Fake pipe bombs sent to liberals BY liberals isn't a hoax, it's a self-incriminating false flag event, dummy.
5 ups, 5y,
3 replies
We really we want to keep it away from children. Bitch I gave my life in the military not just for straight people but for all Americans gay or not, your comment offends me. It is gay people that want more and more, and now that they have gained attention and power are attacking our youth. I have gay friends, and hold nothing against them but wish them the best, and that is for them to turn away from their ways. Simple as that.
3 ups, 5y,
3 replies
Don't argue with Octavia...that person hates service members, but certainly would never have the courage to serve. Thank you for your service!
1 up, 4y
eyy smear
1 up, 4y
i'm honestly glad we're not getting drafted anymore
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
That and he's a perv. Don't let him around your kids. Or any kids. Ponies, too
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
good lord what happened to facts over feelings?
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
nothing?
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
smearing, mate
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
1 up, 4y
feelings lmao
1 up, 4y
'ts like calling someone you disagree with a racist
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
0 ups, 4y
[deleted]
1 up, 5y,
2 replies
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
some leftists want to also oppress LGBT ppl.
also, what kind of name is LGBTQ? it sounds like a sandwich.
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
LGBLT lol
5 ups, 5y,
2 replies
LGBLTBBQ
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
lol
2 ups, 5y
2 ups, 5y
2 ups, 5y,
2 replies
"Until LGBT people are treated equally and have all the same rights as straight people" . They are treated equally, they can vote, drink at the age of 21, join the service AND they also have the right to marry someone of the opposite gender JUST LIKE everyone else. How dare you say they are not treated equal? The problem is that they DO NOT want to be treated equal and want SPECIAL accommodations.

"some Republicans want to oppress LGBT people" using the some people say and victim card together. I guess when you watch left media that all they say is "some people say" because they have no facts and play victimhood is only expected that their viewers will do the same.

I do not hate gay people, I just do not like and accept what they do. Again, I hold nothing against then. And I have the Right not to accept what they do. You just want to twist things around to fit your agenda. It is understood, that is what you learned from your father.

Octavia you are failing me at giving me a good argument, you used to be somewhat good like sometime last year, or maybe I have you confused with someone else. It has been a while.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
2 replies
2 ups, 5y
"In many states, someone can be fired for being LGBT." Maybe in the 1980s, name me 1 state that does. As a matter of fact sexual orientation is protected all across United States, there is nowhere in the USA that you can get fired for being gay, else the employer is in for a big lawsuit.

It sounds to me that you are the one who does not understand how equality works. "Gay people don't want to marry someone of the opposite gender. They want to marry someone of the same gender." IS a special accommodation, not equal to the rest of the population, so clearly there is no equality there to begin with, so why ask to be treated equal when gay people DO NOT want to act equal to the rest? If you act different people will treat you different...right? Right?

You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. Such is twisting things around to fit his agenda. Twist twist twist.

Again dig yourself deeper in that hole.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
It is a special accommodation. I don't know where you are from, but I have never seen being fired for being gay something that happens very often. You are probably again addressing the >1% of the cases of people in the United States legitimately being fired for being gay. Oh, and yes, I do not deny that Christian's are also there wanting special privileges, i do not deny it like you are. But when you want special treatment that other people do not have it is special accommodation. So, what is the difference from a homosexual to marry someone of the same sex compared to a pedophile marrying someone underage? Or a necrophiliac marrying a corpse? Or a bestiality marrying a goat? Who is wrong? While to a straight person someone marrying another person of the same gender is wrong, but that is not the same if you ask a homosexual, to the homosexual is perfectly fine. So, to a pedophile it is perfectly fine to marry a child. So, by you standard, who is to say that a homosexual, pedophile, necrophiliac, bestiality is wrong when they in their own eyes see no wrong. So, if people can do whatever they want, then murderers should not be judged against, since they are doing what they want when they murder someone.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
1 up, 5y
No, not really not saying that you are right at all.

"the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) interprets Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to cover discrimination against LGBT employees, as "allegations of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation necessarily state a claim of discrimination on the basis of sex".[2] This interpretation in essence bars employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in accordance with the Civil Rights Act of 1964.[3] In 2012 the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ruled that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not allow gender identity-based employment discrimination because it is a form of sex discrimination.[4] Then in 2015, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission concluded that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not allow sexual orientation discrimination in employment because it is a form of sex discrimination.

"In 1995, President Bill Clinton's Executive Order 12968establishing criteria for the issuance of security clearances included sexual orientation for the first time in its non-discrimination language: "The United States Government does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disability, or sexual orientation in granting access to classified information." 
As you can see, it is protected.

About Christians being discriminated and persecuted is expected. If you see a Christian making a big deal about being persecuted, then he/she better check their christianity claims because they are wrong. True Christians embrace persecution and discrimination.

Again, I do not care who you are, if you want special treatment than the majority of your population it is special accommodation, for gay people is to marry other gay people, which it has been already granted in some states.

**Can you show me what percent of the population in the year 2018 got fired from being homosexual? Bring it on, because this answer is what you are banking your claims on. ** pls pls pls

I brought pedophiles, necrophiliacs, bestiality because they are also sexual driven illness like homosexuality. It Is outside of what the majority of the population considers normal. However we are lowering the bar for homosexsuals and transgenders now and you are starting to see pedophiles trying to get on that boat to get the bar also lowered as well for them. And surely then necrophiliacs will try to get on that titanic as well.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
1 up, 5y
I do not where your sources get their data from but I lived in Texas and it is protected. I know because I been there, worked there. That article is bogus. But must be right because it is a wiki article from the internet right?!

They have the same right like everyone else to marry who ever they want from the opposite sex just like everyone else. They want special accommodations, just like pedophiles, necrophiliacs, and those who engage in bestiality. No difference here.

Let me paint you this picture. I am driving on a 45 mph road. I identify as a speeder who likes to drive 70 mph. Does that gives me the right to travel at 70 mph on that 45 mph road? No, I will get a ticket just like everyone else that speeds. Equal rights.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Boy you sure like to twist my words. I said it was illegal huh? I said it will get you in a big court case. And you are failing me to provide me evidence that gay people are getting fired for being gay. Again show me the numbers.

"The number is irrelevant" typical you trying to get away from the trap I have set for you because you know you will not win the argument and will lose. It is VERY relevant and has everything to do, you claim there is inequality and that they are getting fired, well show me the numbers. Put your money where your mouth is and stop forwarding trying to avoid this very important and relevant question.

"True Christians embrace persecution and discrimination."

"No True Scotsman fallacy"

Yes Jesus said it very clearly that to fellow him will bring hardship and persecution. Here is a good article with many collected quotes from Jesus talking about Christians being exposed to persecution: https://www.imb.org/2017/03/28/suffering-persecution-prepare/

"Imagine if a country passed a law saying that anyone who owns a Bible will be sentenced to life in prison, but they never enforced it. Would you be okay with that? Or would you not want it to be illegal at all?" There are already several countries like that, I came from one of them. An again, I will have no issues with that because Jesus said that is expected behavior, I will embrace it.

Again equality will mean everyone was gay, but not everyone is gay. They act different than the majority if the population. The majority dictates what is normal. If they want to be equal, then they need to behave equal. That is not the case, they want to behave different yet get equal treatment. If you can't see past that, then I am talking to a dense wall.

No, interracial marriage is good and yields fruit, and is healthy. Homosexuality yields no fruits and is unhealthy.

Again I never said you are right as i proved to you i was right that it IS protected. Again keep pushing that agenda and soon the bar will lower even more to pedophiles and necrophiliacs as it was common in ancient Greece and Rome. We are going backwards here :/
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
1 up, 5y
"That's your opinion, not a fact." It is a fact, you are aware that by fruits I was referring to children... right? Interracial, not interspecies or homosexual, yields children! If that is news to you...darn you are dense. also it is scientific that is healthy genetically as you are building a stronger genetic code. So it is a fact.

You never gave me any numbers to prove that LGBT getting employment discrimination was an issue. You just talk your feelings out. I have already wasted enough time with you. We are going in circles. You ain't worth my time.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
This is the dumbest comment on this meme, and that's saying something. The only way republicans would want "to do more", which I believe you are alluding to some kind of punishment for engaging in homosexual behavior, is if they all converted to Islam. You know, that religion that democrats trip over themselves to defend and put in a positive light? The large majority of both parties is not on the extremes that you seem to automatically assume that they are.
1 up, 5y
Right wingers routinely bring up the Islamic doctrine regarding homosexuality.

The Christian Bible has the exact same doctrine. Seems to me the real issue is that “Christians” are only “Christians” in name.

As much as I hate any radical Muslim they at least adhere to their imaginary religion.

My point is simple people who call themselves “Christians” only cherry pick their holy book. And wipe their asses with the rest.

And don’t give me any of that New Testament bullshit

The imaginary Jesus they claim to worship clearly stated in their fictional book that no laws from the OT were no longer in effect. They are all still in effect.

All 640 give or take.
0 ups, 5y
the last thing you need to have is a 10yo kid who thinks hes whalist!
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
if it's next to hitler it's obviously bad
[deleted]
2 ups, 5y
AKA Godwin's law
1 up, 5y
Show More Comments
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator