I wonder - can people like this even hear themselves speak?

is that the guy who was asking for people to dox teenagers outside a planned parenthood?

Yup!

dude kinda cringe

I eat babies, and so do you...

HEK-239

https://www.google.com/amp/s/articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/03/17/amp/senomyx-flavor-enhancers.aspx

Nice try V. Brand new account and citing snopes? Did you see the comment I left for clayborn? That. You can do better.

He's talking about the fact the snopes is complete crap, not remotely trustworthy or accurate for citation.

Nice try, dingbat, except I don't do links still, including yours or his?


Oh, and given what everyone else said, plus his lefty Gavin McInnes irritable smug squeezed through a yuppie-ized trimmed hipster pimple-in-need-of-a-popping face, all I can say is he can try and stick his finger up my bung so you can lick it clean.

Asswipe.

Good point... I looked at some of this guy's comments. Apparently he's just an extremely brainwashed libtard.

I have too high an opinion of people. Whenever someone comes on and starts spewing retardation in text form I tend to assume it's just one of your alts out trolling. I forget that people really are that ignorant.

Nice delete btw xD

Guy, txt speak is a bit way after my time still?

Do take your meds.

What does that even mean, you massive moron?

[image deleted]

He is also taking bribes and doing "Pay 2 play" in Philly..

Wow. He just won't quit, will he?

I dont want to get my fellow union guys in trouble but its the only way to get contracts in philly and some politicians have their hands out more than the rest, he is 1..

You all should watch the movie "Unplanned" or read the book. Gives a good perspective of both sides of the abortion issue from a director of planned parenthood. I would like to hear your thoughts on it.

But she wasn't always anti abortion. She devoted to the pro-choice movement. Read it then judge for yourself. It's extremely one sided to only read literature from those who support abortion.

I would read a book by a Christian turned Athiest wanting to know what caused the change in mindset. For the record she never paints pro choicers in a bad light, often when people "convert " from one side to another they bad mouth the other side because they were usually hurt by the actions of those in the group, or they saw through the deceit that's something she doesn't do because she genuinely knows that people on both sides often act with very good intentions. Talk to me after you've read it rather than basing all your assumptions on what the media tells you.

Good to hear! I appreciate when someone is willing to give the time of day to the other side. What if I told you I've had some pleasant conversations with planned parenthood staff?

In both cases, I would consider it a good idea to watch/read, simply for the fact that it comes from someone who knows what they're talking about, because they're experienced with the other side.

I would certainly take the word of a former christian, or of someone who used to work at PP, over the word of someone who has never done either.

And don't act like any documentaries that come from SJWs are "even-handed" and "objective". 'The Hunting Ground', a highly biased and thoroughly debunked documentary, is still celebrated, and allowed on Netflix, while 'The Red Pill', a documentary that actually IS objective and even-handed, is lambasted as misogynistic hate speech, and Netflix refuses to show it.

The left /hates/ even-handedness, or what they refer to as "both-sides-ism".

"No, some people on the left hate even-handedness. Not the left in general."

True, but when I talk about the left, I'm referring to the insane clowns who get 99.9% of the publicity, which makes the entire left look like raging lunatics.

Of course, the right has the same problem with FAR right whackjobs like neo-nazis, but they don't get near as much publicity. The right also has a KKK problem, but we both know that I'm of the opinion that's more of a mole job, what's known as a moby, or "black propaganda" (not black as in the people, black as in spy lingo).

He doxxed her. What a loser

I think it's sad (not funny at all) how many people try to paint someone praying out in public as horrible people who should be harrassed. Seems like a rather peaceful way to "protest" to me. What would you have them do, firebomb the clinic?

Acts of violence and murder by pro lifers? Yeah, cause there's alot of those people running around. lol. That's a bunch of nonsense.

And doing anything to save an innocent human life isn't a bad thing in my book. Harassing is one thing, but they aren't doing anything different from what the left does for much lesser issues.

I can think of a few, numerous is a stretch. And all true pro lifers (like the catholic church) condemned those acts. (Shooting of an abortion doctor etc.)

There will always be extremests on any side of any issue. Are we supposed to only look at the wack jobs who try screw up a cause because they want to hurt people? I could just as easily point to the pro abort witches doing pagan rituals outside of planned parenthood and say that's what all pro-choicers are like. But I'm more mature than that. I would hope you are too.

If you look at a person who is committing violence in the name of saving a lives as part of our group then yes you are still looking at the extreme and lumping them with the rest.

People are so quick to jump to the defence of extremist suicide bombing terrorist and say they don't represent Islam. So how are Christian extremists any different. For any of those acts of violence you referenced on the part of so called "Christians" did any true Christians celebrate it or condemn it?

I'm saying they're lying if they say they're Christian while at the same time engaging in senseless violent actions. Just like Hitler even though he was Jewish wouldn't be considered a "true" Jew. I'll have to post the source for that quote but everywhere I did a search for her name turned up similar results she was convicted, did time, admitted to her fault, her actions and all violent actions have been publicly denounced by all prominent pro-life organizations, she has never done such actions again. Like you said people like that are mentally ill. So even if they claim to be acting for a certain cause the mental capacity of that person makes their claims moot. Doesn't take away from the seriousness or evilness of the act but it should not criminalize an entire group. Just like I'm not going to consider you and all pro-choice individuals heartless criminals because of Kermit Gosnell.

"In a 1987 act she now regrets, Sullenger was charged and pled guilty to conspiracy to damage an abortion clinic. Even though the clinic was not damaged, Sullenger took responsibility for her actions, and served 2 years in Federal Prison. Since then, Sullenger has openly denounced violence as a means to stop abortion and has worked for over two decades as an advocate of peaceful activism as a means to save babies and stop abortion" need I say more? She was part of an extreme fundamentalist Bible Church at the time. I cannot think of any valid truly Pro-life truly Christian organization that condones bombing clinics or killing doctors. Again only people who aren't right in the head are doing these things. I can give you plenty of examples of violence done by pro-choice activists.

Yes

No worries about him trying to doxx children?

Sorry, I read that after my comment.

I've seen some bad things from pro-lifers, but overall they seem to be much nicer than pro-choice activists.

I have seen the video, and while I am all for a person's right to support any issue, I have to say, this guy is just an unprofessional douche bag. He harassed an elderly woman, he accused a black child of being white and he tried soliciting private information about them. And he excuses these actions by portraying himself as a valiant social defender of women's rights. If not for the fact he appears dead serious about his perceived moral superiority, the whole thing would have made for a dark comedy skit.

"A dark comedy skit."
That nearly made me fall off my chair with laughter.

I would prefer it was, instead of being ridiculous reality. The man is a fanatical jerk.

Why can't people stick to discussing just what he did? Why must it be framed from another perspective of other people doing something wrong? That can be dealt with on its own at another time. It's *almost* as you believe that one group doing something wrong justifies another group doing something equally as wrong or worse. That's a pretty pathetic belief to have.

What he did was despicable, and while it's (probably) not sufficient grounds, legally, for him to be removed from office, I certainly hope he is voted out by the good people of his district when/if he should run for re-election.

And I may as well say it, because it's the obvious sub-text to most political conversations these days; if you don't like Trump, spend your time working to have him voted out of office. All the time wasted on creating stupid 'orange man bad' memes and insulting those who defend him online, could instead be spent productively. So if he's re-elected, everyone who did that, instead of getting involved with something that would help him be defeated, can only blame themselves if they're not happy with four more years.

Unfortunately, the very reasonable attitude you discuss in this last post is not the attitude that most who follow politics, or most in the media, subscribe to.

I'm glad we can agree on that. And hopefully even on those things about which we disagree, we could remain civil.

he doxxed her, asking if anybody could say where the protesters lived

And I would react the same way for someone harassing pro-choices like he did. (As long as the pro-choicers were peaceful and didn't start anything.)

Yes...